User talk:Juhis2309/sandbox

Peer Review (Connor)

- Good introduction. I think you did a good job of capturing some of the more charismatic things about Nomada that some casual Googler would want to know. Some of the info you present there could probably be expanded on in their own sections:

- You have a limited number of sections here. Parasitism should definitely be a focus for this genus, and you covered that really well. How about other things? Geographic distribution? Appearance? Diet? Ecology? Behavior aside from parasitism? Sociality?

- Second paragraph, Parasitism, *scent rubs off

- Structure is good so far. Make sure as you add in any of the above sections you maintain a good flow between sections.

- In your references you cite a few articles multiple times using different reference numbers. 1 and 7, 3 6 and 8, and 2 and 4 seem to be the same source. Is there a way to have each unique source appear once in the references section with its own reference number? Then every time you site that source in your article, they would all use the same number.

- The sources themselves seem good. Maybe look for some more peer-reviewed journal articles.

- You maintain a neutral point of view and don't expose any bias towards this genus.

Connoranderson0905 (talk) 19:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Connor Anderson

Peer Review (Carlie) 1. Nomada section

• “Cleptoparasitic bees are so named because they enter the nests of a host and lay eggs there”

    * "Klepto" means steal–how exactly is relayed in your definition? 
    * What about this definition makes it different from other cuckoo species?

• “and are mostly hairless, as they do not collect pollen to feed their offspring”

    * Maybe mention why having hair is used in species that collect their own pollen?

• “They are often extraordinarily wasp-like in appearance, with red, black, and yellow colors prevailing, and with smoky (infuscated) wings or wing tips”

    * Could you maybe use a source so we know what defines this as “wasp-like”?
    * What exactly is considered "wasp-like" as opposed to "bee-like"?

• “details of the wing venation, and the nature of the patch of silvery setae at the tip of the female metasoma are the best distinguishing features.”

    * Source?

2. Parasitism section

• “Bees of the Nomada genus most often parasitize bees of the Andrena genus.”

    * Parasitic?

• “Nomada are guided by olfactory receptors and visual cues to Andrena nests[3].”

    * Maybe include link to olfactory wikipedia page?

• “Male cuckoo bees will fly locally secreting a scent which mimics the host female... Furthermore, when male and female bees mate,...”

    * Are the males doing this before or after the females mate?
    * Also is this the case for all cuckoo bees or just Nomada? If you're describing general cuckoo bees maybe still mention that so the reader knows
    * Because bees is such a broad category I think it’s best to use the genus (and species if applicable) name to limit confusion

• “These bees are evolutionarily unique because they do not exhibit pollen collecting behaviors. Nomada parasitizes their host cells by laying eggs in host nests while the female host bee is foraging for pollen, nectar, or oil.”

    * It is my understanding that this is actually very typical of parasititc bee species, if you are explaining what is typical to set up what is unique maybe specify that?

I think your information was really good and well organized, just maybe some small edits to phrasing so that readers who are not experts can easily follow. Cj.hanlon96 (talk) 19:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Carlie Hanlon

Nomada Peer Review

Overall, a great start to the article. There does not seem to be any bias in the language or delivery. I did not see any grammar or punctuation errors. The section on parasitism is well researched and easy to read even for someone who might not study the topic. The pictures are a great way to add to the article and break up the bodies of text. You should aim to add more distinct sections within the article. I feel like the introductory section could be divided and used as basis for other sections. You've touched on some information their physical characteristics and feeding behavior. Maybe these could get their own dedicated section? If there are sufficient sources you could discuss their evolution as you've talked about their relationship with Andrena and the separation of the genus within Nomadini (I would also probably cite the sentence that references this). Stellar job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jm1806 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)