elcome to Wikipedia Jumpin'Joey, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia.

Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.

Policies, guidelines and peer assistance Help and Tutorials
The five pillars of Wikipedia.
The fundamental principles of the project.
Tutorial.
Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
Main policies of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.
How to start a page.
If you want to create a new article
Style Guide.
The complete guide to how articles should look
.
Help.
The complete help guide
Copyright.
Addressing copyright concerns
.
Quick reference.
A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
Help Desk.
Here you can ask other editors for assistance
Your user pages and your sandbox.
Editing in your own "personal" space
Adoption program.
Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.
Frequently asked questions.
Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 13:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Joey. Normally I would leave you a templated message here, welcoming you, but telling you I've reverted your edits, and why. However, and please know I know your intentions are the very best, there were problems with pretty much all of it. First, you cannot add brand new information and tag it "citation needed". One of our pillar policies is verifiability. Every thing you add, you must have a source. You don't necessarily have to cite it, but you sure can't say you can't. If you think it needs a citation, you're probably right, and so should add it with the info or omit the info. Second, you titled a section "(something) and trends". You cannot make analysis here. We only report on what others have written in reliable secondary sources. Bare statistics can come from a primary source, but remember that the school article you are editing is one of roughly 28,000 articles on US high schools alone. There's very good reasons for using the same source for statistics nationwide. That source is NCES. Compass provides excellent data, and promptly. More promptly than NCES. However, Indiana is the exception, not the rule. If you use NCES data, it makes comparison of schools possible. Where Indiana does use the same methodology as NCES, again they are the exception, not the typical state's DOE stats at all. (And they don't report private school numbers at all - NCES does.) The problem with using Compass is it puts the Indiana stats a year ahead of the other 45 or so that report stats. Some don't at all. Every school has differences, but stats are just a quantifiable comparison point. And you can't compare 18-19 (which is just coming out this week on NCES) with 19-20 (which is where Compass is) any more than you can compare apples and oranges. There's nothing to be gained for our readers to have stats, if you cannot compare them. There are many broad areas of subjects that have style guides here on Wikipedia, and secondary schools are one. See WP:WPSCH/AG.

Keep the following in mind:

  1. We are editors, not journalists. We report on what others have written about the subject in reliable secondary sources. Paraphrase your content from reliable secondary sources and cite them.
  2. Whenever possible, please follow the existing page layout, and if you need to add a section, use a standard one from the style guide. There is very little that cannot fit into a standard section, and uniformity in layout makes the information more accessible to our readers.
  3. An article about a real existing subject is not for that subject and isn't controlled by the subject or people connected to it. This isn't the school's page on Wikipedia.
  4. Don't take this personally; it isn't. None of it. Everyone gets here with preconceptions about what Wikipedia is and how it works. Mostly, you'll discover, those preconceptions are incorrect. For instance, your first instinct when you saw your edit was removed was to be a bit angered, no? Well, that's just the normal way we indicate a problem with it. Your edit was a completely proper bold edit which you have every right to make. Equally, when I noticed your edit (I watch about 12,000 of those previously mentioned school articles), I was absolutely correct in removing it due to the multiple deficiencies noted. Now, the next step is to discuss it, and that should be done on the article's talk page. See WP:BRD. Again, it isn't personal, and from the amount of work you put in, it's clear you want to improve at least this school's article. And I'll be happy to help you. I'll leave you some info to read and a link to where you can ask how to questions. Please don't give up. I find this educational, fun, and a rather enlightening look into human behavior. As long as you remember to not take it personally, you'll be fine. Thanks for being a Wikipedian. John from Idegon (talk) 12:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! Jumpin'Joey, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 13:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply