User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Happy New Year, Jusdafax!

Happy New Year!

Jusdafax,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
-- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 23:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Densmore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program

On 14 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program was initiated by United States Senator Harry Reid in 2007 to secretly study the topic of UFOs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks Cal! Jusdafax (talk) 23:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Edits at AN/I

Looking at this Editor Interaction Analyser, I'm seeing an interesting correlation [1] between your edits and mine at AN/I. Neither of us edits that page frequently so this is pretty straightforward. On 10 April 2017, I got called in there for edit warring a policy page [2]. You had been absent from that page for 10 days, yet it only took five hours for you to jumped into the pile on [3]. On 10 October 2017, I !voted in favor of a siteban for someone [4]. One hour later, you !voted Oppose in the same thread [5], after having had only one other post on that page in the preceding 25 days. On 17 January 2018, after both of us had been away from AN/I for about 30 days, someone started an AN/I thread about me. And right after "my" thread was started there, you magically appear at AN/I on 18 January, breaking a 32 day absence. Sure, you had just enough sense to post first in an unrelated thread [6] and, after waiting a decent three days to make things less obvious, you jumped in [7]. That's very interesting, isn't it? I wonder what might be causing that. Whatever it is, I think it would be good if it were to stop. Geogene (talk) 04:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

I don’t know you, have never interacted with you to my recollection, find your comment uncollegial at best, and further note that your comment on my page shows an astonishing breach of WP:AGF. Since this appears to be a reaction to my !vote against your request to sanction another editor whom you have a beef with on a page I have never edited, I now ask that you refrain from any further posts on my Talk page. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, let that be a warning to you. I trust that it will not continue. If it does, I have diffs that will jog your memory. Geogene (talk) 05:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

I again ask you to refrain from posting on my page. Jusdafax (talk) 05:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

• I have reported this interaction to AN/I. Jusdafax (talk) 04:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Pál Hermann

Hi Jusdafax.

I ask you for help to improve this wiki page. Pál Hermann was my grandfather, and I am doing what I can to shed light on his musical compositions. Two scholarships have already been set up in his name (cultuurfonds.nl and colburnschool.edu) and we're planning on performances of Hermann's cello concerto, now finished by Fabio Conti. All exciting and good, but there is a little issue that I perceive as wiki-bullying.

Kleuske for some reason keeps insisting to move the English and Dutch pages of Pál Hermann to Paul Hermann. My grandfather used Pál Hermann for his music compositions, although he also used Paul Hermann when performing as a cellist. As all that is left of him are his compositions, IMSLP and German/French/Hungarian wiki pages have accepted Pál, I would like to undo Kleuske moving of the English and Dutch wiki pages to Paul, but she refuses (see her talk page). Also there was another composer Paul Hermann (1904-1970) active in Berlin, which is what the Italian, French and German Pál Hermann wiki pages explain as disambiguation. As cruel destiny will have it, this namesake of my grandfather was a Nazi composer.

The sources of the name Pál Hermann are my grandfather's birthcertificate, the manuscripts of his music compositions as made accessible through http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:Hermann%2C_P%C3%A1l and also the recent scholarship in LA based Colburn School of Music in his name Pál Hermann as is the publicity cellist Clive Greensmith gives to Hermann's cello concerto.

Could you help out? Many thanks and greetings from Italy, Pvangastel.

• Well... My time on Wikipedia can be pretty limited on occasion. If I get a chance I can try to look into all this. But tell me, how did you come to choose me? Jusdafax (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

ANI

Jusdafax, you have opened a complaint concerning Geogene that is unrelated to the matter that many editors have taken the time and trouble to discuss in the original thread. Please move your complaint to a new ANI thread at which you can voice any and all concerns you may have about Geogene. You will get a full hearing that way and neither issue will distract from the other. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 01:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Since the thread has been closed, the point is moot. Jusdafax (talk) 23:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2018 Valencia, Venezuela fire

On 30 March 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Valencia, Venezuela fire, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

• Many thanks, appreciate it! Jusdafax (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Portals

The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

The Doors discography

Hi Jusdafax, thanks for your interest in The Doors! However, I was forced to undo your recent edit to The Doors discography. Please refer to MOS:LEAD when editing lead sections of articles, as it states "a lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs".Mattchewbaca (meow) 04:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I have moved the bloated lede down to the body of the article to address your concerns. Jusdafax (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Once again, I have reverted your edit to The Doors discography. Please carefully read, and consider what MOS:LEAD is trying to convey. Also, analyze WP:DISCOGSTYLE for information on appropriate style and formatting of artist discographies. The numbered list of the subsection is a helpful guide that breaks down how such an article should be properly laid out. Finally, there are many great Featured Artist discographies that you can reference as suitable examples.

Some of my favorites include: Led Zeppelin discography, Paul Kelly discography, Phil Collins discography, Mariah Carey albums discography, Rihanna discography, and U2 discography. Mattchewbaca (meow) 04:49, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   08:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Kapoho

While the mayor's spokeswoman,in a story dated 9 AM,said 3 homes were left in "Kapoho",that does not mean they were in Kapoho Beach Lots.The 2 PM USGS map shows red lava coloring over all streets that appear to be in the Kapoho Beach Lots subdivision (can check against the maps offered at kapohobeachlots.info) and recent Civil Defense statements and the July 4 and 5 USGS status updates have referred to Kapoho "Ag Lots",apparently an outlying agricultural subdivision that may well include all three remaining homes in Kapoho as a whole.12.144.5.2 (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

I’ll say again, as I did in the edit summary, that we need a source for that aside from a map. It has to say it in plain words, or its WP:OR. It may well be true that the 3 remaining houses are not in the Kapoho Beach Lots, but we need a WP:RS for that. I understand why you want to include this to the article with the map as a source, but it’s also my understanding that Wikipedia doesn’t work that way. Tragically for the three homeowners, this conversation may be mooted very soon. Let’s await developments. If a reliable prose source surfaces, this can be included. Jusdafax (talk) 03:43, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Reporting IPs as vandalism-only accounts

Hi there Jusdafax. I noticed here that you reported an IP to AIV for being a "vandal-only account". Per Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account § IP addresses, IP addresses cannot be considered to be vandalism-only accounts, since 1) They're not technically registered accounts; and 2) They can either be shared or dynamic and may change owners, whereas a registered account is considered to belong only to one person. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions about this. Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

• I don’t report to AIV as often as I used to, and forgot that detail. Have now accordingly fixed my report. Thanks, and cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 01:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Puna Geothermal Venture

On 24 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Puna Geothermal Venture, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a unique geological formation, including dacitic magma at approximately 1050°C (1920°F), was encountered at Puna Geothermal Venture in 2005 when drilling a new geothermal energy well? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Puna Geothermal Venture. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Puna Geothermal Venture), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Casliber 00:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Seriously

Are you stopping me from reverting this long-term abuse? ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 06:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

• Nope. The disruptive edits were coming fast and furious, and I got turned around. Stay frosty, sir. Jusdafax (talk) 06:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kane Tanaka

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kane Tanaka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 100.40.125.198 (talk) 18:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Question about AfC request for Draft:To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science

I recently noticed there was no page for Draft:To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science and was surprised. I'm sure you've heard about this new research company and it was a fairly significant news item (I referenced several reputable news sources in the Draft article). The company was founded by Tom DeLonge and has as advisers numerous very high ranking ex-U.S. defense and intelligence officials, including Luis Elizondo of the Advanced_Aviation_Threat_Identification_Program which I noted you created a page for.

Would you mind having a look at the draft article and perhaps provide feedback or edit, or help expedite the AfC procedure (this is my first creation and it says it could take 8 weeks?! Is that normal?!?) Thanks very much! Cheesy poof (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

• The Acadamy is operating in edgy and controversial territory, and my conclusion for now is that we need more coverage from reliable third party sources. That’s not to say an article shouldn’t be created for it, but it’s going to be pretty thin. If you proceed, I’d suggest using every mainstream source you can find. Marginal sources will likely draw a lot of scrutiny. Elizondo has adopted a low profile of late, it seems. I’d like to see more coverage on him and the Academy. The AATIP had reached that threshold, as I saw it, so I went with it. Thanks for asking for, and considering, my views. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 20:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Removed content

I hope it was restored. thank you. I accidentally deleted the template and left the page empty... — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristiaKatipunan (talk • contribs) 05:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

It’s restored. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 05:23, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Respect

Definition needs to be adjusted. Because needs to be generally known that respect is something that comes with age, as its seeked, and practiced.. and the definition I’ve given is just as good if not better than all these others Quietilpushed (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Jusdafax: justacod

Why do you bother correcting everybody online about everything? Especially on things that you have not experienced at all yourself or have any involvement in at any level. CT2K18 (talk) 17:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

• Your addition to Ballyhaise was more like a blog post, and patently non-encyclopedic. If you’d like to contribute sourced material to Wikipedia, you are welcome to. Judging from your statement above, that seems unlikely. Jusdafax (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

timmi -kat ReCoRDS

Why add stuff? Who are you? Why do you think you know these facts? Do you know us?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.87.129.143 (talk) 13:30, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

• Please review WP:N and WP:RS to gain perspective on the requirements to add material to Wikipedia, thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Arctic Winter Games Complex

Hi, sorry for the lack of source, new to wiki editing. My source would be www.city.iqaluit.nu.ca/residents/recreation. Not sure if I need to provide more than that, also a local resident and employee. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.151.222.150 (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• Welcome! To reference an article, put the link inside reference editing code, also called markup. It’s the letters ref inside “carrots” at the start, and /ref also in carrots at the end. You will see a link to, in one click, add the markup at the bottom of the editing screen. This is called a “bare ref” which can be fleshed out to assist other editors, but it’s much better than nothing. Also, it’s highly recommended that you make an edit summary in the box provided for that. I suggest looking at other people’s edits on the edit page to see how it’s done. The encyclopedia can be a daunting place for a newcomer, but with a bit of learning effort, it’s a snap. One more thing, when you post a personal note on a talk page, it’s good to sign your post with four tildes, these: ~ ...thanks, and again, welcome aboard! Jusdafax (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey!!

Haven't crossed paths with you in a while. Just wondering if you ever considered being an admin, or are you too busy in RL? ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

I’ve been away a few days, and this is a lovely message to return to, thanks. Your good opinion of my character and qualifications is highly appreciated. Like many of us here, my availability varies, and I have felt for many years that that factor might be a negative in an Rfa. I’ve turned down a number of suggestions and even a nomination over the years. But, though I’m leaning heavily against, I’ll consider it, and again, I am much obliged for your faith in my abilities. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 20:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quite frankly, full-time availability doesn't appear to be an obstacle. 😊 What we need are more admins who are content creators/editors who have spent time in the trenches editing and creating articles. We truly do need more admins with the kind of critical thinking skills that are necessary to defuse situations while understanding both sides of a conflict without harboring preconceived notions or biases that may cloud their judgment. And even if the latter does rear its ugly head, an admin should have the moral character to recuse themselves rather than go after an editor in an effort to eliminate them from the project because their views don't align with their own. It was easy to recognize the good qualities you possess because they flow naturally. Please give RfA some serious consideration - I have no doubt there are admins out there who would be happy to endorse your candidacy. ^{Atsme📞📧} 21:28, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

FYI

An article you created, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program, has been moved to "Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program" by a new user, based on a "letter from a senator". I'm not familiar with this subject, but a Google search shows significant results for the original title. The reason for the move seemed tenuous, by an inexperienced user, and perhaps an WP:RM should have been done. I will leave to you to determine if the new title is correct. Just thought you should know... - wolf 03:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

BTW

You might find this link useful. Cheers - wolf 03:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

ANI coment

Embarrassed or not, you missed the point entirely (and AGF, I'm assuming by accident, not design). An admin cannot supervote and close on a contentious topic, EVER. It doesn't matter if it's ITN or not. On that basis ANI is the right venue for admin misuse of the mop. Admins should not make up their own rules just because they want them, but I suspect you know this. - SchroCat (talk) 08:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Seeing as that thread was closed, as I suggested, ten minutes after my comment, you should talk to the closer, not me. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 23:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

It was closed because the admin misuse had been reversed, as the close makes clear. The good think, in this instance, is that because the complaint was made in th right forum, any further misuse by that Admin can refer back to earlier findings where they have acted out of process. That, and a piece of local news didn't make it to the front page. - SchroCat (talk) 09:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your opinion is noted, and in my view the point is moot. Your continued appearance on my page appears to me, rightly or wrongly, to approach hostile territory. If you have issues with the admin action at ITN, this is not the place to post them. I suggest you drop the stick, and move on. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

"hostile territory"? Wrongly, I fear - and I wield no stick to drop, I'm afraid. - SchroCat (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Since you can’t take a hint, please refrain from posting here again. Jusdafax (talk) 19:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of J Hanna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J Hanna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Hanna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 02:48, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jusdafax. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

I just added new information in Seoul Subway Line 9.

I just added new infromation in Seoul Subway Line 9 because constructed section(Sports complex - VHS medical center) started operation in December 1 (GMT + 09:00) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.44.34.223 (talk) 08:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

• OK, thanks for clarifying. Please use edit summaries, they minimize confusion. Thanks again. Jusdafax (talk) 08:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Revertion of deletion

Hello! I noticed that you reverted my deletion of content on a wikipedia page for Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. I deleted the information since the most recent data was from 2015-2017 and the university's financial situation has changed a lot since then, so I did not feel like the content was still relevant. Is it sufficient to delete the section labeled "finances" and merge it with the history section of the article?

• The edit I reverted had no edit summary and deleted a substantial chunk, so it appeared to be vandalism. Since you have started including edit summaries, and since you are not a vandal, I’ll move on. Other editors may or may not take issue with your edits, however. Best wishes! Jusdafax (talk) 02:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Baby It's Cold

Hi. I'm new at this editing thing - but I think I saw a notation that you had rolled back my revision suggesting there wasn't a credible source? (If not, my apologies - as I said, I'm new to this). The source is a clip of the original 1944 Neptune's Daughter. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MFJ7ie_yGU . Pretty sure it is accurate - and I've not seen a more credible source to the original post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beldings (talk • contribs) 02:33, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

• Greetings and welcome! Wikipedia works by citing reliable sources. WP:RS is a good place to start. If you have one from a news source, place the article link inside reference markup, which for convenience is located at the bottom of the edit screen, look for the word ref in carrots and it will enter it for you. The way I learned was to look at what other editors did to place references, etc. Also, please remember Wikipedia entries should be written in an encyclopedic tone. Following these simple steps will help you edit with good results. There are many additional things to learn, but that should get you started. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 02:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips! Should I just re-change the wording then on this page, with a citation? Beldings (talk) 02:49, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

• The current news about some people’s objections to the song is notable, in my view. Presenting the information factually improves the article, also in my view, so it’s worth a shot. You may encounter other editors who disagree. You may also want to review WP:NPOV and WP:NOTE, and if you are really interested in the big picture, there’s always The Missing Manual. Jusdafax (talk) 03:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Way above my pay grade. :-) I'd been singing the song for years, and just wanted to correct an error in the verse! Thanks again.Beldings (talk) 03:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Greg Pritikin Undo

Hi, Just checking in with you regarding the recent undo of an edit I made on Greg Pritikin's page. Virtually none of the claims are cited and the section I removed was very editorial and opinionated. I am a new editor/contributor and trying to learn by starting with simple edits. Please advise as to what I did wrong, and also, you opinion on the claims. Everything I read says to remove unsubstantiated claims vs cluttering things up with citation needed, and also to remove vague, ambiguous content that is based on opinions. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndiaInx (talk • contribs) 04:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

• First off, it’s important to add edit summaries to avoid confusion, which you didn’t do in either of your two edits to the article. Prior to your deletion of the unsourced paragraph, you disruptively added a warning template to the article, with this edit. I chose to revert and sent you a templated warning. If you believe the tagged paragraph in question needs deletion, add a reason as an edit summary. But I notice in reviewing your edit history that you have deleted material from this bio before, last August, and that you have very few other edits. That troubles me, frankly. May I suggest you find other areas to edit in? It’s a big place, this. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 05:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Hounding again

Haven't I asked you not to follow me in every DR issue I get involved in? And there you are again, demanding my head on a platter, just like always. Geogene (talk) 04:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

I have asked you previously to stop posting on my Talk page. You are in violation of that request. Jusdafax (talk) 04:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

The only time I ever post on this page is when, after I post on a DR board, you magically appear, and then start trying some other scheme to get me sanctioned with bogus complaints. Your talk page exists for this purpose. Your request that I not post here in direct response to your continuing provocations elsewhere in Wikipedia is invalid and I will disregard it. Cut it out and you won't have to worry about me posting here again. Geogene (talk) 04:53, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

I yet again request you cease posting here. Jusdafax (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

I yet again request you cease following me. Geogene (talk) 04:58, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

I now, for the third time today, request you to stop posting here. Jusdafax (talk) 05:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Time for another archive ...

... so editors can access your talk page. Thanks and all the best, Miniapolis 23:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, you now have 500 discussions going on here! Please archive your talk page and anything old (say, before 2018) gets put in an archive. Why do you need messages that are 8 years old on your talk page? I wore out my finger scrolling to the bottom of this page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

• To be brief, I will consider archiving per your suggestions, perhaps by year. Jusdafax (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Done It took longer than I thought, but many an archive is now created. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 02:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Kristina Wong

Hello Jusdafax, The EEdit I made to Kristina Wong was taken from a Youtube. Can you help me cite the youtube page?

• Hello, and welcome. YouTube is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. Please read WP:RS for more information on the topic. I know it’s a lot to read, but it’s important material. Also sign your Talk page posts, as it states at the bottom right, below the edit box. Just tap it to add your signature, which pops up when posted. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 09:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

hi

how do i link this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Pit_Bull_Terrier#Old_Family_Red_Nose to that page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.116.83 (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

• Hello IP 82. I see after I reverted you, you were reverted again. Thanks for coming to my Talk page to discuss. OK, so your addition to Staffordshire Bull Terrier reads:

“The American pitbulls where breed from mixing these Irish bulldogs with the AM bloodhound therefore the AM pitbull is a nomenclature for the irish bulldog.”

The sentence as you added it is, to be frank, poorly written and unsusable for an encyclopedia. I looked at the Wikipedia page you link to above. This is not a topic I’m familiar with, and the reference on that Wikipedia page is to a web page that looks rather like a blog, though I’m not sure. I suggest you read WP:RS, then Google around, hopefully find a reliable source that backs you up, and then make your written information based on that source, not copied verbatim but rephrased and written properly. Add the information, then the link to it inside reference coding, located at the bottom area of the edit screen. It is a link that looks like this <ref></ref> - and if you tap it, it appears in the article. Next, just put the link you are using as a reference inside it between <ref> and </ref>. It’s called a “bare ref” on Wikipedia and is considered acceptable, but there is additional information in references that can be added that is helpful. Look at other contributions in the edit screen to learn more. I hope this answers your question. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 15:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Meddling Kids

Reference?

I just finished reading it. Bought it in paperback. But if my word isn't good enough for you, hit Google, get whatever references you like, but your Ctuthulu Mythos page is incomplete without it. Over to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.151.154 (talk) 07:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

• Hello IP 80. I see you refer to your reverted addition the Wikipedia article Cthulhu Mythos in popular culture about “Scooby Doo.” I don’t choose to discuss the content, but it looked like vandalism. If it is not, as you assert, feel free to add the properly sourced information. Please note the section just above where I give details about how to reference, thanks! Jusdafax (talk) 15:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Captain Stern.

If you had looked at my post, I linked to the original source itself, the comic which I directly referenced. Rick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.110.28.47 (talk) 01:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

• Hello IP 65. The article you refer to is titled Captain Sternn, actually. I see you have added a bare link into the article to reference your statement. Your addition is not how things are done at Wikipedia per the Manual of Style at WP:MOS. Thanks for coming here to discuss. Having reverted you once, I choose not to make a further judgement call at this time, but I will ask you to read my reply two sections up where I give information on sourcing. Thanks! Jusdafax (talk) 15:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

East Garden City

Hi Jusdafax, I removed the image on the East Garden City page because the area is no longer a CDP, and the Census map is out of date.

Local residents had long considered the area part of Uniondale. It is unclear why the Bureau designated the area as East Garden City, but this designation preceded any independent neighborhood identity rather than reflecting it. Uniondale residents made successful claims -- to the Census Bureau, county government, and their congressional representative -- that the community should not be artificially divided, and Census-influenced references to "East Garden City" were removed from county geographic area names, etc. The description of East Garden City as a geographic entity with a map, coordinates, etc. is thus anachronistic and requires updating. At the very least, the map should be removed, the inset map corrected to show the current Census geographies (this is beyond my skill set), and the coordinates of the now-non-existent geography removed.

Edit on Fahad Shah

The content was removed because the stories links quoted or even the women’s organisation seems all picked from social media. The mentioned suspension has no more backing, as mentioned in the page that the person doesn’t work there. Considering the matter mentioned seems serious and likely to affect the person of the page - one couldn’t find enough sources to verify claims, so it seemed necessarily to remove the content. AlemiaJon (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Miss Curacao International 2018

Hello, you've made an mistake Miss Curacao Int 2018 DID win the Miss Perfect Body Tittle In Miss Int 2018. Please visit the Miss Int Instagram page yourself so you could see for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filipina123 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

• Hello. Instagram is not what Wikipedia requires as a reference. Please read WP:RS for more information, thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 19:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

ultraman sucks

ultraman is a rip-off of the power rangers. --67.81.107.101 (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

• Perhaps so, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and presents sourced facts, which is why I’ve reverted you twice. Please read WP:RS, thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 04:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15