JusticeOmen

September 2024

Hello, I'm Feeglgeef. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Adam VanHo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Feeglgeef (talk) 23:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

It was not my intention to contribute in a manner that is unconstructive, and for that I apologize. I disagree with the removal of this page from the encyclopedia and I was not aware removing the "removal notice" was not simply my "vote" against it. Thank you. JusticeOmen (talk) 23:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

I was not aware removing the "removal notice" was not simply my "vote" against it. That seems hard to believe, because you also removed my reply in the AfD. The reply in which I was highlighting likely COI-editing throughout the article's history. You must've been aware you were removing my message, and that's not constructive. You're absolutely entitled to challenge anything I've said, but please don't just delete things. GhostOfNoMan 18:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

JusticeOmen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Good afternoon. I am not a "sockpuppet". I have created this account to respond to the request to remove an entry from the encyclopedia. If I have broken some rule, I apologize. I confess to a lack of familiarity with processes. I believe I am entitled to express my views on the matter. I do not intend to behave destructively, and I reiterate I am not a "sockpuppet" of any sort whatsoever. I did not receive any form of warning or message before this action was taken. I request this block to be lifted. Thank you for your time. JusticeOmen (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Good afternoon. I am not a "sockpuppet". I have created this account to respond to the request to remove an entry from the encyclopedia. If I have broken some rule, I apologize. I confess to a lack of familiarity with processes. I believe I am entitled to express my views on the matter. I do not intend to behave destructively, and I reiterate I am not a "sockpuppet" of any sort whatsoever. I did not receive any form of warning or message before this action was taken. I request this block to be lifted. Thank you for your time. [[User:JusticeOmen|JusticeOmen]] ([[User talk:JusticeOmen#top|talk]]) 23:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Good afternoon. I am not a "sockpuppet". I have created this account to respond to the request to remove an entry from the encyclopedia. If I have broken some rule, I apologize. I confess to a lack of familiarity with processes. I believe I am entitled to express my views on the matter. I do not intend to behave destructively, and I reiterate I am not a "sockpuppet" of any sort whatsoever. I did not receive any form of warning or message before this action was taken. I request this block to be lifted. Thank you for your time. [[User:JusticeOmen|JusticeOmen]] ([[User talk:JusticeOmen#top|talk]]) 23:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Good afternoon. I am not a "sockpuppet". I have created this account to respond to the request to remove an entry from the encyclopedia. If I have broken some rule, I apologize. I confess to a lack of familiarity with processes. I believe I am entitled to express my views on the matter. I do not intend to behave destructively, and I reiterate I am not a "sockpuppet" of any sort whatsoever. I did not receive any form of warning or message before this action was taken. I request this block to be lifted. Thank you for your time. [[User:JusticeOmen|JusticeOmen]] ([[User talk:JusticeOmen#top|talk]]) 23:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

JusticeOmen (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

I am requesting to be unblocked.

Please refer to my request above @Discospinster. Thank you. JusticeOmen (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Your only edits in Wikipedia have been related to this article, similarly to other single-purpose accounts, which raises suspicion. Furthermore, despite your claim that you are entitled to express your views on the matter, you removed the comments of others who supported deleting the article, as well as a comment pointing out the similar behaviour of several other editors, and said that the nomination was frivolous. You will have to convince the administrator reviewing your block that you will contribute positively to the project and not be disruptive. ... discospinster _talk 16:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)