Justin Weinberg

Welcome!

Hello, Justin Weinberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! – NJD-DE (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

———

Hi, and thanks for the welcome. In creating the article, I attempted to be make it "just the facts" with plenty of citations as evidence for the editors. If there's anything else I should do, please let me know. Justin Weinberg (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daily Nous (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daily Nous and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daily Nous, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Justin Weinberg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Daily Nous

Hello, Justin Weinberg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daily Nous, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Daily Nous

Hello, Justin Weinberg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daily Nous".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, Liz. I could actually use some help with this. It is strange to me that Daily Nous does not have its own Wikipedia entry, owing to the central role it has played for 9+ years in the academic philosophy profession, and it being cited a lot in Wikipedia. My understanding is that this may have something to do with the lack of articles elsewhere about it. So here — https://quillette.com/2023/04/17/philosophys-no-go-zone/ — is one more news article, one that focuses on Daily Nous. Perhaps, in addition to the various articles mentioned in the draft, which I would like to request be undeleted, this will be sufficient to qualify Daily Nous for an entry. Thanks for your help. Justin Weinberg (talk) 04:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

As the editor of the website you should not be attempting to create an article on the topic. If the topic is notable, someone who does not have a vested interest in the website will write an article about it.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Daily Nous has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daily Nous. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. I've removed 10 inline citations. Justin Weinberg (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daily Nous has been accepted

Daily Nous, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 01:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Justin Weinberg (talk) 15:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daily Nous

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daily Nous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Nous. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 19:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Daily Nous for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daily Nous is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Nous (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)