Justinfleming810

January 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Joyce Hyser, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Pankow, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (This warning includes prior warnings under your IP address, 75.112.230.12.) SummerPhD (talk) 13:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

AdmrBoltz please unblock me give me a chance man i wont vandalize anymore ill only edit a few pages a day and a few pages a week please? Justinfleming810 31 January 2014 (UTC)

If you properly format your request your chances of being unblocked would increase. I suggest you read the instructions in the block template. --AdmrBoltz 12:55, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

AdmrBoltz i officially understand the instructions Justinfleming810 31 January 2014 (UTC)

You still need to format the unblock request properly. --AdmrBoltz 19:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Admrboltz i just submitted an unblock request Justinfleming810 31 January 2014 (UTC) Admrboltz yesterday i just submitted an unblock request Justinfleming810 31 January 2014 (UTC)

The block notice further down on your user talk page clearly states what you need to do to be unblocked. --AdmrBoltz 21:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC) AdmrBoltz 2 weeks ago i just made an unblock appeal Justinfleming810 2 February 2014 (UTC) Admrboltz i dont know how to thank you Justinfleming810 2 February 2014 (UTC) Admrboltz BTW, i have read it it properly and i understood Justinfleming810 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Justinfleming810, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Justinfleming810! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of conspiracy-thriller films and television series. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of conspiracy-thriller films and television series was changed by Justinfleming810 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9031 on 2014-01-16T21:26:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 15 Minutes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''Please do not add material to articles without citing a reliable source. As you have been warned several time under your user name and previously under your IP address, you will be blocked from editing if you do so again. If you are having difficulty, please place {{helpme}} on your talk page to ask an administrator for assistance or contact me on my talk page. Thanks. SummerPhD (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jim Ross may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''James William "Jim" Ross''' (born January 3, 1952<ref name="Birthdate">{{cite web|last=Ross|first=Jim|url=http://www.jrsbarbq.com/2008/01/05/happy-new-year-everyone-lots-of-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of conspiracy-thriller films and television series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Portland, Flashpoint and The Skulls

Bird on a Wire (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Romantic

Mountain film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shoot to Kill

Sudden Impact (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thriller

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Justinfleming810 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

 

Accept reason:

While you still haven't read how to properly request to be unblocked, I am going to assume good faith. AdmrBoltz 20:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Help me!

Help me with...

Justinfleming810 (talk) 00:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

i have been blocked please unblock me i wont vandalize anymore can you give me a chance? please?

ill only edit one page only and a few

Placing three {{Help me}} templates for the same thing is a bit like continuously pressing the elevator button over and over. It won't make any difference. The box above that informs you of the block also lets you know what to do if you want to become unblocked. The only way to get unblocked is to follow that procedure, which eventually will require the help of an admin. Joys! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 00:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Help me!

Help me with...

Justinfleming810 (talk) 00:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

i have been blocked please unblock me i want vandalize anymore can you give me a chance? please?

Help me!

Help me with...

Justinfleming810 (talk) 00:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

i have been blocked please unblock me i wont vandalize anymore can you give me a chance? please?

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of conspiracy-thriller films and television series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Conspiracy, The Firm, Big Brother and Total Recall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Linda Fiorentino, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

SummerPhd info said she was born in 1958 not 1960 and john pankow was not born on february 18, 1957 he was born on april 28, 1954 justinfleming810 5 February 2014 (UTC)

You did not cite a reliable source for either change. In fact, your change to John Pankow disagreed with the source cited there. (I have now added March 9, 1960 to Linda Fiorentino, citing one of the sources that was already in the article.) One of Wikipedia's foundational policies is verifiability. If you wish to add or change birth dates, you MUST cite reliable sources for the information. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

SummerPhD you mean cite as in talk to right? justinfleming810 5 February 2014 (UTC)

No. When you add information you must reference a reliable source that gives that information. For example:

John Smith was born February 30, 1901.<ref>Doe, Jane. ''Big City Newspaper'', September 31, 2015, "[http://www.bigcitynewspaper.com/all-about-john-smith All About John Smith]". Accessed November 31, 2015.</ref>

Would show as:

John Smith was born February 30, 1901.

References:

SummerPhD (talk) 03:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

summerphd oh i see justinfleming810 (UTC)

summerphd i just found a reliable source for john pankow and for Linda Fiorentino its from imdb can i change them now? justinfleming810 6 February 2014 (UTC)

As the site is user edited, biographical information should not be sourced to IMDb. It is not considered to be reliable. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)SummerPhD

so the answer is no? justinfleming 7 February 2014 (UTC)

SummerPhD i just found info for linda fiorentino ((http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Linda_Fiorentino)) justinfleming810 8 February 2014 (UTC)

This is clearly not a reliable source. Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC) summerPhD hows this http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Linda Fiorentino/}</ref> 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Linda Fiorentino may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [South Philadelphia]], Pennsylvania to her mother, a housewife and father, a steel contractor.<ref>{{cite news |first=Deirdre |last=Donahue |title=Leggy Linda Fiorentino Says Gotcha! to Some of the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Steve Lombardi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Thunder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC) SummerPhD i found an reliable source on linda fiorentino it says she was born in 1958 from a book called the ridley scott encyclopedia 12 February 2014 (UTC) SummerPhD i found an reliable source on linda fiorentino it says she was born in 1958 from a book called the ridley scott encyclopedia 12 February 2014 (UTC)SummerPhD www.pro-wrestlers.com/bios/display_article.php?id=0000000086 this a reliable source on steve lombardi 09 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jennifer Morrison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jennifer Morrison. Content of this nature is in violation of Wikipedia policy which says you need to provide a reliable source for information about living persons. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Liz|Read!]] Talk! she is irish because i can tell by her last name justinfleming 810 13 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jennifer Morrison, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
The relevant editing guidelines are WP:BLPCAT and WP:CATEGRS. In brief: do not add ethnicity or "descent" categories unless their descriptions are backed up by reliably-sourced statements in the article text. Inferring descent from surnames is contrary to the policy on original research.

If, despite the many notices and warnings posted on this page, you continue to make unsourced edits of this type, you will be blocked from editing. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 01:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC) SuperMarioMan ( talk ) she is irish because i can tell by her last name justinfleming 810 ( talk ) 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 2 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Linda Fiorentino page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC) A930913 the Linda Fiorentino page needs to be fixed i having trouble Justinfleming 810 3 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Linda Fiorentino may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Fiorentino was born March 9, 1958, in [[South Philadelphia]], Pennsylvania.<ref>{{cite web|title=Linda Fiorentino Biography|url=http:///www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Linda_Fiorentino.
• <ref name=Astrology>|url=http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Linda_Fiorentino/4257/</ref></ref></ She has studied photography since 1987 at the [[International Center of Photography]] in [[New

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC) i dont know how to fix it can you do it? Justinfleming810 4 April 2014 (UTC) BracketBot the Linda Fiorentino page needs to be fixed Justinfleming810 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello Justinfleming810. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 05:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Not a reliable source

The site you have repeatedly added to Linda Fiorentino, www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Linda_Fiorentino, is not in any way a reliable source. It cannot be used as a source on Wikipedia. Please do not add it again.

For an explanation on what does count as a reliable source, please see WP:IRS. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Similarly, the three sources you removed from Linda Fiorentino are reliable sources. Please get some help with our policies before continuing. I strongly recommend that you try the Adopt-a-user program for help getting started. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

(talk) the Steve Lombardi page needs to be fixed Justinfleming810 4 April 2014 (UTC)

I "fixed" the Steve Lombardi and several others by reverting your edits.

DO NOT ADD THAT ASTROLOGY PAGE AS A SOURCE ON THE Linda Fiorentino PAGE OR ANY OTHER, it is not a reliable source. The Wikia page is user edited. It is not a reliable source either. It is clear you either have not read or did not understand our policy on reliable sources. I strongly recommend that you try the Adopt-a-user program. Until you try that or something else to help you get familiar with our policies, I have no choice but to revert your problematic edits and give you warnings. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Linda Fiorentino, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 16:23, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocked – continuing to add unsourced or unreliably sourced material to articles

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 week for

The need for reliable sourcing (especially in biographies of living persons) has been explained to you. You have continuously been notified and then warned about adding unsourced and unreliably sourced material and yet you persist in doing so – lately over and over again at Linda Fiorentino. You have received more than enough notice of the problem, appear unwilling to stop, and your conduct at this point has become disruptive and a drain on other editor's time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

(talk) im sorry i wont do it again unblock me Justinfleming810 4 April 2014 (UTC)(talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justinfleming810 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Decline reason:

You're really going to need to write a compelling unblock request that indicates you have some clue as to why you've been blocked and how you will avoid the problem in the future. It's clear that you have a serious problem evaluating sources and communicating with other editors. Can you please take a moment to outline your future approach to editing? Kuru (talk) 21:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk) i went there an read it now what do i do? reason i was blocked because i keep vandalizing and into biographical information the information was incorrect and i disagree with the date and the year the celebrities were born in Justinfleming810 7 April 2014 (UTC) Fuhghettaboutit (talk) unblock me the reason i vandalized because the biographical information was incorrect User:Justinfleming810 15 April 2014 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Fiorentino page is broken Justinfleming810 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Only warning

User edited websites are NOT reliable sources and CANNOT be used as sources for biographical information. Among others, note that any site with "wiki" in its name or with likes on the page allowing you to make "corrections" is a user edited site and cannot be used as a source. Additionally, if the page already includes reliably sourced information, as Linda Fiorentino does, do not simply replace that information with new information. Discuss the information on the article's talk page to find a consensus as to how to handle the situation.

As you seem to still not understand the situation and our policies regarding biographies of living persons, I STRONGLY recommend that you discuss any edits you plan to make BEFORE you make them.

If you make unsourced or poorly sourced changes again, you will be blocked again for a substantially longer time. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Given your complete disregard of the reason for your blocks shown in your replacing well sourced information in Natascha McElhone without any source or explanation, I can only conclude that you do not wish to follow or simply cannot understand our policies. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges and continued addition of unsourced or poorly sourced information contravening the biographies of living persons policies, despite previous multiple warnings and blocks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Connormah (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Connormah (talk)i have understood that guide already Justinfleming810 28 May 2014

{{unblock|} i have understood that guide already Justinfleming810 03 June 2014

please {{unblock|} me Justinfleming810}]User talk:Justinfleming810|talk) 23 June 2014 (UTC) Connormah (talk)please {{unblock|} me Justinfleming810}]User talk:Justinfleming810|talk) 25 June 2014 (UTC)Connormah (talk 23 December 2014 (UTC) i want to be unblocked give me a chance please?