Jwo4

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nordic Optical Telescope, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 19:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Keeping grasss green"

A page you created, Keeping grasss green, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 13:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

why is it gibberish

Proposed deletion of Keeping grasss green

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Keeping grasss green, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Acroterion _(talk) 13:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Book The Republicans

A tag has been placed on Book The Republicans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

how did i do with adding stuff onto that page? does it meet the criteria? i hope it does please be compassionate with me it is my first article i want it to grow!

The article is a book review, which is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Please see WP:NOT#OR. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Book The Republicans. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

go ahead and delete it it is fine o take off

Proposed deletion of "United We Stand (free online book)"

The deletion of an article you created, United We Stand (free online book), has been proposed for the following reason:

Original research.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 13:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of United We Stand (free online book)

A tag has been placed on United We Stand (free online book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Dynaflow babble 13:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

i wrote it though — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwo4 (talk • contribs)

See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online for information on how to give Wikipedia the necessary permission to republish your own work that has been published elsewhere online. Please also take a moment to peruse the Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:No original research content policies to make sure the content you wish to donate is appropriate for Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks. --Dynaflow babble 19:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyright question

can i copy things from here and add them to my website? if i say so and so copywrited? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwo4 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia article texts are copyrighted, but they are freely available for use and modification under the GNU Free Documentation License. For images, their copyright status can vary and will appear on the image pages for each individual image. For more detailed information, see Wikipedia:Copyrights. --Dynaflow babble 19:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of J&J&J Productions

A tag has been placed on J&J&J Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 12:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)