Kabiraj.arpan

Welcome

Hi, Kabiraj.arpan. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 04:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Projective resolutions and free resolutions. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 04:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Projective resolutions and free resolutions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 06:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eilenberg-Ganea theorem.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sarah (talk) 23:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Kabiraj.arpan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 23:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kabiraj.arpan. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 13:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sarah (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kabiraj.arpan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by heather walls (talk) 16:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kabiraj.arpan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey Review me! 20:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

puzzling edit

I am puzzled by this edit.

If I write

$\sup _{k\in \{1,2,3\}}k^{2},\,$

that means

$\sup\{1^{2},2^{2},3^{2}\}.\,$

If I write

$\sup\{k^{2}:k\in \{1,2,3\}\},\,$

then that also means

$\sup\{1^{2},2^{2},3^{2}\}.\,$

One might omit the part that says k ∈ {1,2,3} if that is clear from the context, and thus write either

$\sup _{k}k^{2},\,$

or

$\sup\{k^{2}\},\,$

but you seem to combine the two and get

$\sup _{k}\{k^{2}:k\in \{1,2,3\}\}.\,$

I think that is confusing at best. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Eilenberg–Ganea theorem

I've moved Eilenberg–Ganea theorem into the article space.

I found only one place where I thought an additional inline citation should be added, and I put the appropriate tag on it.

Another thing to be done is to figure out which other articles should link to this new article, and add the links. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:33, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

The Signpost: 6 September 2016

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

• News and notes: AffCom still grappling with WMF Board's criteria for new chapters

• Special report: Olympics readership depended on language

• In the media: Librarians, Wikipedians, and a library of Wikipedia coverage

• WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia

• Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between

• Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit

• Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them

• Recent research: One study encounters critique of its ethics from Wikipedians; another critiques the ethics employed by Wikipedia

• Blog: Upload of free photos from Swiss library underway

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 16:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)