User talk:KamGill/sandbox

Peer Review By Dawn McCune: I really like how use added your own categories that were not already part of this article. I think people will find these categories very helpful when doing research. It looks like the Treatment section that is already part of this article is only updated to 2012 which is a few years old. Maybe you could add some updated information to this section showing how things have changed over the years. It is also pointed out in the main article that in the academic training section, it says the information is all based on what is being done in the US. Maybe you could find some worldwide information to add. Over all your additions look great and sound very beneficial to someone who would be researching this topic. It looks like you did some good research and have a good understanding of this topic. It does seem to be written in Wikipedia format and is natural information not pushing to one side of the topic or the other.

Peer review by LemonIsLime Your article was very insightful and gave several layers of information on your topic. I would suggest you check in with minor grammatical errors and don't be afraid to add some more sources and try to draw out a lot more information from the sources that you used. Overall, I found this information to be very informative and helpful to further understanding what your topic means. We already talked about this, but we both need to hyperlink to other Wikipedia articles like Samuel did on his article! You have done a fantastic job so far! Thank you for helping me get caught up as well! I also liked that the categories you created were not ones the original article editors had provided. Get to the library and find a book! I think that’ll be the source push that’ll get you over the top! Wonderful job and wonderful article! LemonisLime (talk) 23:08, 22 March 2018 (UTC)LemonIsLime