Kara42
December 2007
editThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 14:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Katherine Hayes
editThe article Katherine Hayes has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Katherine Hayes
editA tag has been placed on Katherine Hayes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Katherine Hayes
editA tag has been placed on Katherine Hayes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Peasantwarrior (talk) 16:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Peasantwarrior (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
I can see a couple of reasons why this article keeps being deleted. First of all, it doesn't make any real claims of importance - as far as I can see it's about an actress who was in three episodes of a TV series, so it looks like a single minor role. You can't really compare a bit-part TV actress to Julia Roberts. The best way to establish notability is to include references to sources (such as newspapers or magazines) which discuss the subject in detail - all I see is a very short entry on IMDB, which isn't really enough. Finally, the article includes negative information about her private life (drunken incidents at parties and the like) but provides no sources to back up the claims - please see the policy on biographies of living people for why this is unacceptable. If you think you can improve the article then please do, but please don't keep recreating it in it's current form - it will just get deleted, and you'll just get blocked. Best Iain99Balderdash and piffle 16:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I've answered you on my talk page. Thanks. Peasantwarrior (talk) 16:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)