Karebh

Species problem revert

Sure, no problem. Thanks for letting me know! I did it for 2 reasons: first, species concepts are nowhere discussed (but might be there; see that article's Talk and/or that of Species for more). Second, the BSC vs PSC - sp. vs ssp. thing is the most "visible" issue in the debate to the lay reader; I thought it might be of more than passing interest at the state where the page currently stands.
If you can do me a favor though, disentangle PSC and ESC. They're not the same; though both rely heavily on phylogenies, monophyly is the only (AFAIK) "character" relevant in the PSC, whereas in the ESC, a species is a diagnosable (by morphology or whatnot) (mono)phyletic lineage.
If you'd like to do some work on the page or make Species concept an own page one day, drop me a line! Dysmorodrepanis 07:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

File:Species problem figB&W.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Species problem figB&W.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Species problem removal

It was an essay that someone plonked onto species - I moved it to species problem because it seemed to be about that, and I was reluctant to just delete it. Totnesmartin (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)