Kartiktiwary

Possibly unfree File:Attractions in Sonbhadra.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Attractions in Sonbhadra.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 14:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

I am the owner of this picture. This picture is. Created by me. All the pictures in it is clicked by me. This topic was already discussed.

Vijaygarh Fort

Hi Kartiktiwary. Could you let me know why you removed the merge tags on Vijaygarh Fort and Bijai Garh? These are variant spellings of the same name. Is there some reason that we need to maintain two separate articles? —Psychonaut (talk) 13:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Both are not same places.both are different., Vijaygarh Fort is in Sonbhadra Uttar Pradesh while Bijai Garh is inRajasthan.

Thats why they can not be merge.

Do you know. Chandrakanta tv serial??

This []Vijaygarh Fort ]] is related to princess Chandrakanta.

kartiktiwary3 (talk) 17:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

OK, interesting that two different forts from the same era have the same name. In the future, though, please don't remove merge templates without explanation. Instead, provide an explanation on the talk page as instructed by the template. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Sam Sailor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Siya Ke Ram without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maryada Purushottam Siya Ke Ram

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maryada Purushottam Siya Ke Ram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Thnx for removing your deletion tag.

kartiktiwary3 (talk) 08:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

He didn't remove the tag; I did. By the way, could you let me know what date you took the photo File:Rihand Dam.jpg? —Psychonaut (talk) 08:53, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Thnx 2 u too.summary Rihand Dam.jpg is detailed. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 10:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright prroblem: Kartik Aaryan

Your addition to Kartik Aaryan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 12:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

I've raised the issue of your continued copyright violations at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Note that indefinitely does not mean permanently. To be unblocked you need to convince the reviewing administrator that you understand and are willing to abide by Wikipedia's copyright policies. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kartiktiwary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

previously i hadn't read the policies regarding use of non free content but this time i read it carefully and understand it properly.from this time i promise you that I will not further violet any policy so i.request you to unblock me.i shall highly obliged to you.kartiktiwary3 (talk) 18:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Despite your efforts to sanitize your page, you've been receiving these warnings since July. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kartiktiwary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

That time i was new to Wikipedia. I didn't know how to edit articles properly.from my mistake i taught many things about Wikipedia and its edit. I am still improving myself with a good effort.I apologize for ignoring those warnings about policies regarding use of non free content.i didn't read that. But now I have read those policies properly and understand that.i promise you that I will not make those mistakes again and will not violet any policy.so please unblock me.kartiktiwary3 (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Marchjuly put it very well, in that you've been given several warnings about this and you even explicitly asked for assistance on avoiding copyright, yet you continued to do this. While we do try to give people the benefit of the doubt, you've been given plenty of chances to rectify your behavior and you've shown a clear disregard for policy. There's no way that you couldn't have been aware that posting WP:COPYVIO (photo, text, or otherwise) was anything other than unacceptable and your rationale here doesn't really give me the impression that you would do any different if you were unblocked. You're essentially just making excuses for your behavior rather than confessing that you knew that you were wrong and did it anyway. That's what bothers me the most about this and this is why I'm going to ask that you take some time away from Wikipedia. The copyvio, paired with edits like this one, seems to suggest that you just aren't really ready to edit Wikipedia in a responsible manner. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not an administrator, so I cannot unblock you. I do not think claiming "I was new" or "I didn't know how to edit article properly", however, is really going to gain you any sympathy given your editing history. You did same thing on Keith Sequeira regarding using copyrighted content. You specifically asked at Talk:Keith Sequeira#Avoiding copyright violations how to avoid this kind of thing, and an explanation was given as to what is generally considered acceptable both in that thread and in Talk:Keith Sequeira#Copyright problem removed. So, not sure why you would do the same thing in another article. The same goes for the images you've been uploading/trying to use. Numerous warnings/explanations were left on your talk page, yet you just seem to ignore them and continue to plod ahead as if nobody will notice. One of the good things (or bad things) about Wikipedia is that everything we do as an editor is noticed by someone; Making mistakes is expected and other editors are willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and help explain why something shouldn't be done or how to do something better. If, however, you keep repeating the same mistakes over and over again, other editors become less willing to assume good faith and begin to wonder whether there is a competence issue instead. I think the latter is the situation you currently find yourself in, so you're really going to have to convince an administrator that you are sincere and that you will most definitely not do the same thing in the future.

Also, it might be a good idea to let some time pass before requesting another "block review". If your request is reviewed and declined by an administrator, then requesting another review shortly thereafter is almost surely going to be seen as insincere and is likely going to be declined as well. While it's true that indefinite blocks do not mean blocked forever, they are usually only made when an administrator feels the editor being blocked needs to take quite a bit of time off and reflect upon why they were blocked. Such blocks are almost never intended to only last a few days, yet alone a few hours. So repeatedly requesting reviews is not going to get you very far in my opinion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kartiktiwary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had stated there that I apologize for my mistakes.i just redo(undid) an older version of Kartik Aaryan. I didn't know that there are some copyright issues. User:Psychonaut hadn't give me time to explain myself. He notified me as below >>Copyright prroblem: Kartik Aaryan[edit]

Your addition to Kartik Aaryan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 12:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 I've raised the issue of your continued copyright violations at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)<<

He just gave me 21 minutes and expected an explanation from me.between That time i. was not come online. Anyway its my mistake that i did so i again apologize for my mistakes. I request you that please unblock me. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 02:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As has already been explained by multiple admins, we will need to see evidence that you understand our copyright policy, why adhering to it is important, and why editors who cannot or do not adhere to it are blocked. As I have not seen any evidence this is the case, I am turning your talk page access off, and recommend you contact the Unblock Ticket Request System for an unblock. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I first raised the issue of your copyright violations on 15 November, and you were blocked on 23 November after continuing the problematic behaviour. By my count that's 8 days, not 21 minutes. Though it seems you've racked up over 40 copyvio warnings since July; you've responded to almost none of these, and in the rare cases you have, you have made trivially disprovable claims about your authorship of the disputed material (see for example Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 August 1#File:Attractions of sonbhadra.jpeg, Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 August 1#File:Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg, Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 August 1#File:Robertsganj Eco Point.jpg, and Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 November 13#File:Rihand Dam.jpg). Rather than claim you weren't given enough time to explain your actions, perhaps you might instead explain in your own words the problem with your edits, your understanding of our policies on copyrights and plagiarism, and how you will avoid problems in the future? This is probably the only thing that is going to get you unblocked. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

>>To Psychonaut The uploads that were deleted are related to me. I captured them using my mobile.my hometown is there. How can i give you a written prove for that.have u ever find those pictures somewhere else??? No, because they are mine. You raise your voice for those unnecessary issues.you put a deletion tag to my page Maryada Purushottam Siya Ke Ram. When i gave you explanation for that you removed that tag. For Kartik Aaryan |Psychonaut hadn't wait for my explanation.you should have patience.You just gave me 21 minutes for that. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Asian Month Barnstar
	Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 11:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Kartiktiwary1.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kartiktiwary1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Kartik.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kartik.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. User:Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Kartiktiwary.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kartiktiwary.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

2nd chance

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.
• Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Katie^talk 01:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Siya Ke Ram 1st edit request

Season 5

Surpanakha asks Khara to kill Ram, Sita and Lakshman. Khara attacks Ram with his asuras. Ram kills Khara by using his powers. Shurpanakha reaches Lanka, tells everyone about the attack. Surpanakha asks Ravan to avenge her insult by Ram. Ravan decides to punish Ram for his deeds.Sugriva's coronation ceremony begins.Hanuman crowns Sugriva as the king of Kishkindha.A furious Bali returns to Kishkindha and attacks Sugriva for locking him up in the cave.Hanuman rescues Sugriva from Bali.Ravan got information about Ram and that Sita is Ram's weakness.Ravan decides to abduct Sita.Ravan tells Marich about Surpanakha's humiliation and seeks his help to avenge her insult. Hanuman takes Sugriva to Rishimukh mountain.

References

http://www.hotstar.com/tv/siya-ke-ram/6363 kartiktiwary3 (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

• Helped I have copied your edit request to Talk:Siya Ke Ram. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

As mentioned in 2nd Chance given me Katie.I provide a proposed edit to my Siya Ke Ram article. Please review this proposed edit of 2nd chance and please accept my unblock request as i complete understand the copyright policies of Wikipedia.I want say thanks to Katie. I apologize for my mistakes. Please unblock me kartiktiwary3 (talk) 02:32, 21 May 2016 (UTC)}}

Siya Ke Ram 2nd Edit Request

Development and Production

Siya Ke Ram’ TV show has been envisioned and created by well known writers namely Anand Neelakantan (the best-selling author of Asura and Ajaya) and Subrat Sinha along with creative consultant Devdutt Pattanaik.

People are loving "Siya Ke Ram” because it is different from other shows. Many 'Ramayan' shows were there but this Ramayan is different. Viewers are finding it refreshing because the concept is different. There are many untold stories which have been never explored on the small screen before.

—Nikhil Sinha, Producer of Siya Ke Ram,in an interview to Times Of India.

References

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kartiktiwary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have 2nd chance given by Katie,for which i proposed edit as Siya Ke Ram 1st edit request . then i request on Unblock Ticket Request System as suggested by Ritchie333 but i did not get response,then i seek help using "{{Help me|your question here}}".Sam Sailor help me by copying my proposed edit to my articles talk page Talk:Siya Ke Ram. Now i proposed Siya Ke Ram 2nd Edit Request. I request all the users to help me plz review my both proposed edit as given by 2nd chance and unblock me as i completely understand copywrite prolies of wikipedia.I am blocked for last 5 months, it too much time as punishment. I appolise for my mistakes.kartiktiwary3 (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You clearly do not understand how copyright works; the edit you've suggested above ("Siya Ke Ram’ TV show has been envisioned and created by well known writers namely Anand Neelakantan (the best-selling author of Asura and Ajaya) and Subrat Sinha along with creative consultant Devdutt Pattanaik") is copied directly from here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I gave reference for that..my reference is same as OhNoitsJamie linked. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 00:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You added a blurb of text, a quote, and a reference. The quote was OK, because it was clearly formatted as a quote with the source. The other text was not. Providing a reference does not give you free reign to cut-and-paste sentences/paragraphs from the cited reference unless they are clearly marked as such. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

I've restored the previous unblock request which was declined - please be careful not to remove declined requests while you are still blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Final warning

If you remove a previously declined unblock request again, you talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016

Wikipedia Asian Month

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kartiktiwary. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tourist attractions in Sonbhadra

A tag has been placed on Category:Tourist attractions in Sonbhadra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2020 (UTC)