Wikipedia

Talk:Keith Sequeira

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Other possible sources

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've moved all of these links from the article to the talk page so they can be sorted out. Sources should really be added as inline citations whenever possible to clearly show what the article content the source is supposed to be supporting. Simply adding bunch of links to the article as "Other sources" is not really constructive at all and not really how sources are added on Wikipedia.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 01:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

What should I do so that no copyright policy will be violated. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 01:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kartiktiwary. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written in our own words. Moreover, what we write is supposed to accurately reflect what reliable sources say and not be our own original research. Simply copying and pasting, writing exactly or writing almost exactly content we find on other webpages is going to be flagged as a copy violation almost every time. Since some of the article content has been flagged as a copyright violation, you should stop editing the problem text until an administrator or OTRS volunteer, etc. can review it. They will fix it if possible. If you'd like to make suggestions for them to consider, then you can do so by clicking here as explained in "Otherwise, you may write a new article without copyright-infringing material. Click "Show" to read where and how." on the template. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Can i rewrite this personal life section of Keith Sequeira with new contents in my own words which doesn't violate any copyright policy. After my edit you can verify that so that you can remove this Copyright violation tag.
kartiktiwary3 (talk) 18:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
As explained above, you can rewrite that section if you wish, but you cannot make changes directly to the article. You need to do it here (that opens a special subpage for you to work on) so click the link and you'll see the instructions. Only administrators, OTRS volunteers or copyright clerks are allowed to remove copyright violation templates; Eventually, one of them will come and check to the page. If there is no copyright violation, they will remove the tag. If there is a copyright violation, they will remove whatever text they can't fix or think is in appropriate. Once they have finished evaluating the article they will remove the tag, and describe what action they took at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2015 October 21. If you decide to try and rewrite the disputed content by using the special subpage I linked to above, they will review it and add it to the article (with whatever improvements they feel are necessary) if they feel your rewrite corrects the problem. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
I had created the temp. Article section for the Personal Life section of Keith Sequeira. You can check that section so that you can give me the clearance by which I will be able for the request of removal of the copyright violation tag.
kartiktiwary3 (talk) 04:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
You don't need clearance from me. The person who checks the template will look at your rewrite and add use it if they feel it fixes the problems. There are only so many people checking this kind of thing, so it just may take some time for someone to get to it. The template says "Unless the copyright status of the text on this page is clarified, the problematic text or the entire page may be deleted one week after the time of its listing." so that it's likely to take at least a week. Maybe you can speed things up a bit by adding a note about the rewrite to the "Keith Sequeira" section at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2015 October 21. Or, you could also try adding Template:admin help to this page and wait for an administrator to answer your request. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Question for administrator

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As the User:Marchjuly told me, i created the temp section for Keith Sequeira's Section Personal life in my own words. I request all administrator, OTRS and clerk For the rewrite of Keith Sequeiras personal life section and removal of the copyright violation tag as soon as possible. > --kartiktiwary3 (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've cleaned up the article. Wikipedia:Writing better articles can be helpful for future. utcursch | talk 17:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.veethi.com/india-people/keith_sequeira-profile-6859-14.htm#open_edit_bio. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to Utcursch for sorting this out. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Date of birth

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Keith Sequeira Age, Height, Weight, Favorite Things and More source cited for Sequeira's date of birth says he was born on 30 April 1980. Sparuthi, however, has been changning the birth year to 1970 without providing a reliable source. Per WP:BLPSOURCES, a reliable source needs to be cited for any information which might be considered contentious in a Wikipedia article about a living person; Dates of birth need to be supported by a reliable citation. If the currently cited source is incorrect, then another source needs to be provided which shows this. The birth year should not simply be changed per WP:RSCONTEXT because that does not accurately reflect what the cited source says. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keith Sequeira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Keith_Sequeira&oldid=1202204335"