License tagging for File:Metamorfosi church.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Metamorfosi church.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Boofoo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Boofoo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Metamorfosi laconias.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Metamorfosi laconias.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Galletti7.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Galletti7.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mirallas.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Mirallas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010

edit

  Your addition to File:Mirallas.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you upload a media file with blatantly inaccurate copyright status,as you did with File:Mirallas.jpg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You claimed to be the copyright holder of the image, and stated that you were releasing it into the public domain. However, the copyright on the image appears to belong to Zimbio, Inc, and their web site indicates copyright status which is far from being public domain. I also see that you have a history of copyright problems, and have been warned several times. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


Further to the above I have looked at several other files you have uploaded, and every one I have looked at I have found on other web sites. In some cases those web sites explicitly claim copyright, as for example zerozerofootball.com includes a copy of File:Pardo78.jpg and has a notice claiming copyright. In other cases there is no immediately evident claim of copyright, but the overall impression is that you have copied files you have found on the internet and claimed to be the copyright holder without justification. If this is not the case then please explain how you have come to be the copyright holder of these images and how they have come to be used on numerous web sites without acknowledgement to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Pardo78.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zerozerofootball.com/player/urko_pardo/current/statistics/139/zoomstats/46886. As a copyright violation, File:Pardo78.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Pardo78.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Pardo78.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Pardo78.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Pardo78.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Raulbravo.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raulbravo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 17:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Dudu1.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dudu1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 17:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Papadopoulos33.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Papadopoulos33.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 17:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:A papadopoulos.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://mundialfutbol.paginawebsite1.com/blog/lista-de-la-seleccion-grecia-equipo-para-el-mundial-sudafrica-2010/avraam-papadopoulos/. As a copyright violation, File:A papadopoulos.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:A papadopoulos.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. TbhotchTalk C. 01:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Good work in creating new articles, but it would also be helpful if you added them to relevant categories, and wikified them according to our manual of style. You might also be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Greece. For any questions, feel free to ask. Constantine 11:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Guillaume Panuel

edit
 

The article Guillaume Panuel has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


Advice and Warning

edit

As the reviewing administrator for these deletions, I need to offer you some advice. We are very glad to have articles about footballers from all countries,  but  they MUST have references. If they  have appeared in games on the highest level national league---which is the basic requirement for them to have articles in Wikipedia-- there should always be references in the relevant national newspapers --usually easily findable in Google News and Google News Archive. There should also  be a discussion or at least a listing of them in the web site for their team, and a listing in the general football web sites. These references need to be added, and they need to be added at the very beginning.

Sometimes I have been able to check   articles like these  before deletion and add at least one necessary reference, but it is not my responsibility to do so, nor the responsibility of anyone here but yourself. If you can write the article in the first place , you surely  have the references in front of you when you are doing so, in order to get the names right and add the key statistics. That's when to do it! It is unfair to expect others to fill in what you can do so easily.  I expect that you will start doing this, otherwise you may find that you are wasting your efforts, because the articles will get deleted.  

In particular, I am not going to work on the currently nominated articles. If you want them kept, work on  them yourself.   DGG ( talk ) 03:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Reply

Proposed deletion of Guillaume Panuel

edit
 

The article Guillaume Panuel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 16:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your article Ermis Kiveriou BC

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Ermis Kiveriou BC to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Everymorning (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply