User talk:Kim Dent-Brown/Archive Jan 2008
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
editJust a quick note to thank you for your commenting on my successful RFA. I appreciate your taking the time to participate, and hope to live up to the support I received. I'll be using the tools carefully and for the benefit of Wikipedia. Cheers! Tony Fox (arf!) 05:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Kim Dent-Brown,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
Adopter
editHi Kim Dent-Brown,
I've started to clean up the Adopters' list. You appear to have changed username since you added yourself to the list but not updated your info there. In case you're still interested, can you kindly update your information? Or, if you're not interested any more, would you mind removing yourself? Thank you and happy editing, Snowolf How can I help? 22:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)~~
- Thanks for the warning - will do so now! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 09:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your work following Wikipedia:Peer review/Wicca/archive1, I've thrown in the hat and nominated this article for WP:GA, I think it meets the criteria. — xaosflux Talk 01:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's great, thank you. I was getting round to nominate it myself, but it's much better coming from someone who can be more neutral about the article's merits and faults! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 09:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Hilbres
editthanks for rewording the page
there are a couple of blanks you may be able to help filling in ;)
Official thanks, slightly delayed due to post-RfA crash (who knew?)
edit
...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful RFA, which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral.
I would particularly like to thank Acalamari and Alison, my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally.
If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me.
If you hate RfA thankspam, please forgive me. I promise I won't block you in retaliation for deleting it ;-)
And forgive me if I need a Wikibreak now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me climbing the Reichstag, now would you?
Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!)
This RfA thanks inspired by Neranei's, which was inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.