Kissable54

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playwrights' Studio Scotland (November 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Per below - draft continually resubmitted without demonstrable notability of subject

— MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Kissable54! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Playwrights' studio Scotland

Archived discussion

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#13:33, 20 November 2023 review of submission by Kissable54 Not Even a Mother (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft being moved and suspected use of multiple accounts

Hello. Per the above, the draft was rejected. This is a final decision. If you disagreed, you should have contacted the help desk as linked above. Instead, @Not Even a Mother moved the page to mainspace, which is not permitted as that account does not meet the criteria to qualify as an Articles for Creation reviewer, nor have they even applied for permission to act as one. I however, am an AFC reviewer and a New Page Patroller and have moved this back to draft space. Six editors in total decided the article was not fit for mainspace, and yet you worked with an editor who created their account the day after I rejected the article to get it moved. I suspect that Not Even a Mother is an account operated by you. As a result, I have reported my suspicions for an investigation. If you wish to challenge my rejection of the draft, please contact the AFC helpdesk to ask others for their views, neither you or any other editor not a registered participant of AFC may override the consensus of AFC reviewers and move an article to mainspace. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kissable54. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)