Kitsunelaine

Kitsunelaine, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kitsunelaine! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FrankieL1985 (talk) 17:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The extra categories don't help people find all these pages, and Kamen Rider Ghost isn't out yet so we don't know it's genres. Give it time. Currently, it's just speculation. This is a debate we can have when the series starts. Kitsunelaine (talk) 02:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Northern Ryukyuan languages

Hi, where did you find your information for the edits you made? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 16:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey there! I was watching something on TV and found it interesting. Cheers! Kitsunelaine (talk) 02:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Garo

Hey again, I just started List of Garo: Goldstorm Sho episodes and got the basic form of it made, but it still needs major work. Would you mind helping me a little? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 05:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, sure! Kitsunelaine (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I think it's a little unusual that we have one page for the film and the TV series; would it not be better to just create another article for the film? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 09:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The two are so closely related that it doesn't really matter to have separate pages at this stage. Also, the film on it's own isn't that notable. Kitsunelaine (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

About Garo Summaries

Dear Kitsunelaine: Every Garo page has a summary of the story. I don't understand what's the big problem that you keep reverting it. Every film gets a summary and unless you have some major reason why I can't, I'm going to keep posting the summaries. Taikage (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

The whole plot to the movie isn't needed on the main page when the plot is covered on all the character pages. Kitsunelaine (talk) 11:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Kitsunelaine: Every Garo page has a plot summary; it's more standard-expected to have one than to not have one. If you don't believe me, you can check all the pages. Plus, the character parts aren't meant to be given a summary, not necessarily covering everything. Nobody has given a complete summary for all the characters, so what you mentioned isn't true. Taikage (talk) 04:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

You wrote way too much. Keep the plot summary basic. Don't give out too many details. That's what episode lists are for. Kitsunelaine (talk) 05:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Kitsunelaine: There's nothing in the episode lists. In fact, most of the episode lists have nothing written in on them to begin with, not even the Garo wikias bother to do it; everything you reasoned so far has rather weak merit. Taikage (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Then write in the episode lists? "It's not there" is a weak excuse when you're already writing excess material. Also, you keep getting the names wrong. List of Garo: Gold Storm Sho episodes -- Add in the summaries yourself. Kitsunelaine (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Kitsunelaine: The names can be corrected, as for excess material, it's a few paragraphs, a full page at worse, which is consistent to the other pages. And it's not a weak excuse, why must you keep enforcing something that's not enforced in other pages except this one? What's so special that every other page is exactly how I said it's presented except this one? Taikage (talk) 16:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Every other Garo page does not give a full summary like you've written for Gold Storm and Zero, and they also have separate episode lists where full summaries can be written instead. You are making the pages unlike the others by providing such a thorough plot summary on the main article. Kitsunelaine (talk) 01:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Kitsunelaine: What I wrote is hardly thorough, I just focused on main plots. Did I mention about Daigo's vendetta for Seiji? Rian's secret love for Ryuga exposed after Zinga took over her body? Amily's demise by her own husband? D Ringo's involvement in saving the city along with citizens that Garo saved in the past? I would call that thorough. You also forgot to mention all the Garo movies and TV specials, they all have summaries. Taikage (talk) 04:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The other pages have summaries, but what they don't do is cover the show from start to finish. The main pages should have short summaries that tell the basic plot of the show while the episode lists should be more thorough like the summary you wrote. Leave the ones I wrote in place and use the ones you wrote on List of Garo: Gold Storm Sho episodes. Kitsunelaine (talk) 04:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Kamen Rider Drive's new form

& the new type speed form is from movie-taisen official website — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.192.103.246 (talk) 05:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

There is nothing on the movie taisen website that says anything you've been writing. There are no names for anything, just a poster. http://www.movie-taisen.com/ We don't know anything that will happen in the movie until more information is released via official channels. Kitsunelaine (talk) 05:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Did you even read the talk page?

"After a review of this talk page, I find that myself, Lonely678, Gsfelipe94 and Sportsfan 1234 were all in favour of the full header (UK>DK>SW>DK), while the opposition lies only with the now-banned Ryulong and [IP User]. On its own, that is 4:2, as all other involved parties were neutral. There is no use arguing further unless there is more support for the 'ampersand' version of the title. Changing them back now."

Teams go from Scotland to Denmark, then to Sweden, and then back to Denmark. They do not go from Scotland to "Denmark and Sweden at the same time somehow". Every other header uses arrows, so there's no need for ampersands. Please respect the majority on the talk page. Shadow2 (talk) 23:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

You're obsessing and you should stop proclaiming a 5 month old discussion as written law. You were gone for a month and nobody bothered to change it back to your version, which is needlessly clunky. Kitsunelaine (talk) 23:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure where you're getting your information, but I checked back quite a few times in the past months and saw it still had all four countries. The decision was made five months ago, but what makes your singular decision now so much more important? "Clunky" doesn't really matter. There are lots of "clunky" things on the Amazing Race pages, but no-one cares to correct them. I personally think the "Used Express Pass" symbol in the table is clunky, but that's what we do. The Amazing Race is a travel show, and it is built on a travel itinerary. The other headers indicate a progression from one country to another. In cases such as TAR14, we do not list it as (Switzerland > Germany & Austria) because they went from Switzerland to Germany, and then to Austria. This was the decision we reached as a group, and if you have any further objections then I would invite you to discuss them on the Talk Page. Shadow2 (talk) 02:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Disucssions from five months ago are not law. Clunkiness matters for the flow of the page. If "nobody bothered to correct them", then why are we here? That's like the "But what about the starving children in africa?" of Wiki arguments. Kitsunelaine (talk) 02:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

I ask you a second time. If that decision is not law, then what makes your singular opinion here law? Shadow2 (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

If your version were better, it wouldn't be being reverted by other people, and we wouldn't be having this discussion five months later. Kitsunelaine (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) What are you guys arguing about exactly? Perhaps you could use a third opinion? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 01:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Shadow is making some Amazing Race pages needlessly clunky, by changing section headers so they're really long-- he's insisting they contain exact back and forth travel when it's not necessary. He was gone for a month and nobody saw fit to change it back to his version, and when it gets changed back after he reverted it, he comes over here and rants about it. He keeps citing a five month old argument as law, but when people have since fought against his version, I don't think that matters. Kitsunelaine (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Maybe an WP:RFC is in order then? There was consensus to have the "clunky" title, but consensus can change. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 01:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

I have not been "gone for five months", I just don't always log in. I still checked in on the pages and they remained without the ampersand for a while until just recently Shadow2 (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Did you read this talk page? The one you're arguing on? I said you were gone for a month. And that you were citing an argument from five months ago as law. Please read what you're arguing against if you're going to do it so angrily. Kitsunelaine (talk) 23:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm 166.171.187.247. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 166.171.187.247 (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

You don't own talk pages. You were trying to remove evidence towards your obvious brigade. - Kitsunelaine ^{[Beware. The foxgirls are coming.]} 01:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Kamen Rider Drive characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenji Takahashi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kitsunelaine. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)