Welcome!

edit

Hello, St Cuthberts Mill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


Image without license

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Dry End, Number 1 Machine (PM1) circa 1930.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 04:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Cuthberts Mill (February 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! St Cuthberts Mill, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 16:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

{{Unblock-unusername|reason=to access sandbox material already drafted St Cuthberts Mill (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)}}Reply

Unblock requests must be made after signing in to this account. The username, klintern, would be appropriate as far as I can see. --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Klintern (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

to access sandbox material already drafted and redraft based on wikipedia recommendations St Cuthberts Mill (talk) 11:29, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from Wikipedia:Changing username and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Yamla (talk) 12:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Remember to familiarise yourself with WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Cuthberts Mill (March 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:St Cuthberts Mill concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St Cuthberts Mill, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:St Cuthberts Mill

edit
 

Hello, Klintern. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St Cuthberts Mill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Cuthberts Mill has been accepted

edit
 
St Cuthberts Mill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup banner on St Cuthberts Mill

edit

A few weeks ago another editor added a cleanup banner was added to St Cuthberts Mill, saying " the refs and external links are excessive, and writing style could be improved." can you help to address these?— Rod talk 18:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply