Kljacks2

Welcome!

Hello, Kljacks2, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Kljacks2/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sheldopedia (talk) 03:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kljacks2/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Kljacks2/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krispy_Kreme. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sheldopedia (talk) 03:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Analysis

The article on wiki that discusses Trump and Billy Bush having a supposedly private conversation, offers several controversial points.

First, it is supposed to be a private interview between Billy and Donald. One could say that it was a set up. If so, by whom? Controversy, it could be spies for the Democratic Party trying to discredit Trump. This was written during the campaign for president.

Trump was recorded as saying, he was a star and that stars could get away with doing anything. He said he could grad women’s private parts and they would not protest. He even said that he had been known to kiss women without asking. Those statements could be seen as lewd and that Trump should have been criminally charged. Again, it depends on who’s asking. Billy Bush didn’t seem to think much of the remarks. In fact, he egged Trump on.

This all broke two days before the 2016 presidential debate. This could be seen as strategically placed. Trump make accusations that Hillary’s clan make have had something to do with it. Trump then stated that Bill Clinton had said worst things on the golf course, which had no significant to this situation.

I am of the opinion that the conversation included in the wiki article will be controversial, depending on if a Trump vs non Trump supporter reads it. But, it shouldn’t be. The evidence was recorded, don’t see how this could be debated.

I was surprised that the article used real world words-like there was not sugar-coating. Calling the scandal, “Pussygate” and referring to women’s private parts as “p***y.” Pretty controversial.

There seems to be references to reports from Access Hollywood, The Associated Press, TMZ, which sometimes can be a little embellished for rating. Kljacks2 (talk) 22:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)