Kohl Thompson

September 2020

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Henricus Regius—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Le Maire, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Kohl Thompson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kohl Thompson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Annie M. G. Schmidt, you may be blocked from editing. The spelling "Smit" is not mentioned in any of the sources, including the Dutch language sources used as references for the information about her father. I'm afraid that you do need to add sources when you change information, especially information that contradicts existing sources. bonadea contributions talk 14:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Since you have not had a welcome message yet, and since you have been asking about how to add sources – here are some links to information about that, and other important things to be aware of. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 14:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Kohl Thompson, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Kohl Thompson, good luck, and have fun. bonadea contributions talk 14:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

List of most popular given names

Please stop deleting data regarding the most popular given names in Luxembourg, which are clearly cited with an article in a newspaper. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of most popular given names. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop removing the data regarding the most popular given names in Luxembourg in 2014, which have been properly cited with a news article. You said you were unable to find the link, so I added an updated link that cites the article and is still active. You then removed the data again and included profanity directed against me in your edit summary. At this point, your behavior qualifies as disruptive editing. Consider this a warning. I will be reporting your behavior, which could lead to a temporary block on your editing, if you delete the material again. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 21:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Consider this another warning. Your edit to the List of most popular given names was vandalism. No, Candace is not among the most popular names in Canada and the cited source does not say so. I will report your behavior if you continue your disruptive editing and you could be blocked. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 23:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I wouldn't call it vandalism, but it is certainly disruptive editing. Kohl Thompson, it looks like you are changing sourced information based on your personal views on whether a name can be popular – at least that's what your post here seems to say. Candace and Chloe are not mentioned in the source, but Charlie is indeed in fourth place. --bonadea contributions talk 18:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You could be blocked for continued disruptive editing. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Stop your disruptive editing. If you continue, you can be blocked. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)