Konaahmed, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Konaahmed! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marjana Chowdhury.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Marjana Chowdhury.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss Bangladesh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please read WP:REFB to learn about the correct method of reference citation. David Biddulph (talk) 00:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did with this edit to Miss Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 00:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Inquiry about conflict of interest

edit

Greetings! I notice you have edited the Marjana Chowdhury article a lot. I also notice that you claim to be the photographer of File:Marjana.jpg, which is used in the article. If you took a posed picture of her three years ago, this very strongly suggests you have a conflict of interest with Chowdhury. Could you please disclose what your relationship is with Chowdhury? Be advised that if you are editing Wikipedia for pay—at the direction of her, her manager, or a PR agency, for instance—you must disclose this paid editing per WP:PAID. —C.Fred (talk) 15:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Richie Campbell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Miss Bangladesh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Do not include unsourced, non-notable pageants. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Bangladesh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Richie Campbell (talk) 20:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing. Do not include unsourced and unremarkable pageants. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Miss Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Richie Campbell (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


  Again, do not add unremarkable minor pageants and questionable entries of winners as what you did in the Miss Bangladesh article. If you want to discuss your reasons, respond to this entry. The mother articles of these pageants were deleted e.g., Miss Grand International, Miss Supranational, Miss Intercontinental Miss Intercontinental Pageant. In addition, your entries did not contain third party reliable sources. The policy on sourcing is Wikipedia:Verifiability, which requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations. The policy is strictly applied to all material in the mainspace—articles, lists, and sections of articles—without exception, and in particular to biographies of living persons. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Miss Bangladesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Richie Campbell (talk) 01:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thakurgaon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Miss Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Bangladesh. Dl2000 (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Help Miss Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing. Repeated vandalism to wikipedia by adding not significant pageants that were deleted via AFD consensus. Richie Campbell (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thakurgaon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Meghna Alam

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meghna Alam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghna Alam. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Tangia Zaman Methila

edit

Hello, Konaahmed,

Thank you for creating Tangia Zaman Methila.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please see WP:BASIC. Please see WP:ANYBIO Please see WP:NMODEL ... People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Porn actors notability is referred to in WP:NMODEL. At present, there are insufficient resources for notability for this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 01:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tasnia Farin moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Tasnia Farin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mehazabien Chowdhury, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't remove tags on the articles without actually fixing the problem or discussing on the article talk page. There are still substantial elements of the page without any sources. If you want to remove the tags, I'll gladly remove everything without a source, but that's NOT what I want to do. Ravensfire (talk) 13:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mehazabien Chowdhury. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Seriously, stop removing the tags. Ravensfire (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tasnova Hoque Elvin, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Furthermore, several of your removals of cleanup templates have also removed date format and/or national variety of English templates. In rare cases it may be appropriate to change the date format or the national variety of English of an article, but it is almost never okay to remove those templates entirely. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Bangladesh. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Samira Khan Mahi

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samira Khan Mahi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samira Khan Mahi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, List of most-followed Instagram accounts in Bangladesh

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of most-followed Instagram accounts in Bangladesh. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of most-followed Instagram accounts. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of most-followed Instagram accounts. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 06:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply