Koroosh1986
|
Edits on List of maraji
editDear Koroosh!
Thanks for your edits on List of maraji but I think you mixed up transliterations of ق & غ ; You replaced gh with q even for غ where its quite incorrect. Actually I think you took tip from my edit(of two common names) where I replaced gh with 'q' but it was for ق.
Actually in simple English transliteration,
- ق → Q
- غ → Gh
I'm listing few of your changes to show you the difference:
| S.N. in list | Previous | Changed | Correct/Incorrect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gharavi | Qaravi | Incorrect because it is غروي i.e. with غ |
| 4 | Asghar | Asqar | Incorrect because it is اصغر i.e. with غ |
| 6 | Dastgheib | Dastqeib | Incorrect because it is دستغیب i.e. with غ |
| 9 | Faghih | Faqih | Correct because it is فقيه i.e. with ق |
| 25 | Sadoughi | Sadouqi | Correct because it is صدوقی i.e. with ق |
There is general consensus regarding spelling of names of maraji, which is as follows:
- Name column will:
- This will be arranged as following:
- With horizontal lines in cell, Common name(English | Arabic) at top then English in Mid & Arabic below
- with this arrangement the Name column will look as:
For details you can refer - Talk:List_of_maraji#Consensus.
If you have any confusion or clarification you can contact me.
--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 06:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:GrandAyatollahGasemTaei.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:GrandAyatollahGasemTaei.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
edit
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Blocked
edit
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. feydey (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Koroosh1986 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You blocked me indefinitely because of the uploading the pictures. I thought I used the correct License, but it seems it was not. You mentioned to the user “Mitra20000” who is one my friends. I do not understand what is the reason of indefinite blocking (and not a just definite blocking)? If I have made some mistakes in putting the correct License for the pictures, I should be blocked definitely. You can check my contributions during the last month that I joined Wikipedia. I had many editing and creating new pages without any problems. Please, change your decision about this blocking. Regards ---Koroosh1986 (talk) 14:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
So, you and Mitra are acquainted? See WP:MEAT then. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Amin Mamaqani
edit
A tag has been placed on Mohammad Amin Mamaqani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marcus Qwertyus 21:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Mohammad Amin Mamaqani for deletion
edit A discussion has begun about whether the article Mohammad Amin Mamaqani, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Amin Mamaqani until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marcus Qwertyus 16:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
salaam brother add ayatolah mahfoozi to the list please of maraji —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bachehjonoob (talk • contribs) 16:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Mohammad Yaqoobi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Non notable cleric. Fails WP:N, WP:V and WP:GNG..
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article to address the issues raised. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk.
Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process. If you cannot improve the article within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to improve the article. Tanbircdq (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Mohammad Yaqoobi for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Yaqoobi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Yaqoobi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tanbircdq (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Mahmoud Hassani Sorkhi for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahmoud Hassani Sorkhi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoud Hassani Sorkhi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ElAhrairah inspect damage⁄berate 08:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC)