User talk:KoshVorlon/Archive 23

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Atlan in topic WP:RFC
Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 30

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
949   Leonidas I (talk)     Add sources
162   Lindsey Way (talk)           Add sources
51   Information published by WikiLeaks (talk)   Add sources
26   I'm a Marionette (talk)         Add sources
441   Henry Morgan (talk)   Add sources
118   Firewalking (talk)       Add sources
1,849   Victoria's Secret (talk) Cleanup
292   Bal des débutantes (talk)     Cleanup
115   Healing factor (talk)   Cleanup
5   José María Cabral (talk)           Expand
581   Orthodox Judaism (talk)   Expand
2   Kentucky Route 34 (talk)         Expand
136   Funk rock (talk)     Unencyclopaedic
308   Russian apartment bombings (talk) Unencyclopaedic
116   Racism in Israel (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,682   Werewolf (talk) Merge
29   Non-Aristotelian logic (talk)           Merge
157   Roman Catholic theology (talk) Merge
1,490   Teen Titans (TV series) (talk)   Wikify
62   Rita Rudner (talk)           Wikify
31   Flag of Western Sahara (talk)     Wikify
3   HappyFresh (talk)           Orphan
25   Dunno Y2... Life Is a Moment (talk)           Orphan
2   Sudai (talk)           Orphan
9   Getafe, Bohol (talk)     Stub
7   Olav Hammer (talk)           Stub
34   Jonathan Joss (talk)           Stub
33   Peep This (talk)         Stub
39   Nerites (mythology) (talk)           Stub
9   Mikhail Kruglov (talk)           Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Hat at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Hi KoshVorlon! How are you doing today?

I'm an arbitration clerk, which means I help manage and administer the arbitration process (on behalf of the committee). I've reverted your hat at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard (but have archived the discussion). While it is very appreciated when editors help moderate the arbitration process, I'm not sure that that was a disruptive enough, active enough discussion to warrant hatting of the entire discussion at that time. The talk page of the Committee noticeboard is to discuss decisions of the Committee. In addition, I notice that you've participated and expressed your opinion on this topic, making it more difficult to maintain the status of uninvolved editor needed for you to hat a discussion. Also, your wording in If you feel that strongly about it, run for arbcom feels like it's a bit less constructive than it could have been.

Also, in general, please do add your signature when you close a discussion, so that people can find who took the action, whether it was a clerk action or that of an uninvolved editor, etc. Thanks again for your time! L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 14:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Don't go there

Don't mess with other user's pages [13] -- especially with incorrect edit summaries. That content is not a template, it's a custom banner. NE Ent 12:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

 

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Makeandtoss (talk) 12:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
75   Casomorphin (talk)           Add sources
22,485   Facebook (talk) Add sources
26   Religion in national symbols (talk) Add sources
2,654   Aaliyah (talk) Add sources
794   Love & Hip Hop: Hollywood (talk)   Add sources
31   Magical organization (talk)           Add sources
923   Secondary school (talk)     Cleanup
99   Murder by Death (band) (talk)       Cleanup
83   Flag protocol (talk)       Cleanup
5,434   Twitter (talk) Expand
3   Simhah ben Samuel of Vitry (talk)           Expand
21,448   Wikipedia (talk) Expand
655   Pope Pius XII (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,243   Channel 4 (talk) Unencyclopaedic
53   Prenatal methamphetamine exposure (talk)         Unencyclopaedic
1,686   AOL (talk) Merge
292   Secret police (talk)     Merge
61   Civic holiday (talk)           Merge
51   Business idea (talk)         Wikify
73   Sidecar (company) (talk)           Wikify
21   Bob Carlos Clarke (talk)         Wikify
4   Ernestine Fu (talk)           Orphan
5   Open Ukraine (talk)         Orphan
0   Arroyo de Abejuela (talk)           Orphan
74   Amrapali Gupta (talk)           Stub
76   Wired (website) (talk)         Stub
9   Philip Sherburne (talk)           Stub
99   Suhasi Goradia Dhami (talk)           Stub
62   K. Michelle: My Life (talk)         Stub
5   José María Cabral (director) (talk)           Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

WP:RFC

Does "default" mean "minimum" in your world? Because that's not what it means. All it means is that the bot automatically delists the RFC after 30 days. It says "Editors may choose to end them earlier or extend them longer" right after that, which you conveniently neglected to mention. Conversely, Afd's are actually supposed to run for 7 days at least, but I never saw you complain when Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassination of Anna Politkovskaya was closed after a day and a half, which is even less time than the RFC you keep opening. You also (wrongly) invoked WP:BURO here, but now suddenly you seem to have gone back to stubbornly enforcing policy to the letter in order to force the RFC back open. This behavior wastes other people's time and effort and has resulted in all your blocks. At what point are going to start listening to other editors?--Atlan (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Look, I don't fault you for your consensus seeking, which I can only approve of. But you can't start an RFC on a minor issue and expect it to run 30 days. We're not in a hurry, but 30 days is just exceedingly long for this. I'm sorry I was brutally honest in my close of the RFC, but really, your reasoning was bizarre and you can already see no one agreeing with you. It is the same as with the AFD I linked to. The problem is that you are always so sure you are right and then push through with these actions. It can be a little exasperating. If you want, I can re-open the RFC for you, but I would advise against it. Trust me on this.--Atlan (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
I have reopened it anyway, because other people asked for it. You can read about it on the talk page. I believe this is silly process wonkery at work, but at least it's not your responsibility now.--Atlan (talk) 19:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)