KuhnstylePro

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Spy Kids was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:45, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spy Kids: The Destination

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Spy Kids: The Destination, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that.

Adminship request

Could you make me and administrator, please? KuhnstylePro, his talk his contributions!

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Uw-vandalism3im

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I am so sorry about that. KuhnstylePro, his talk his contributions!

Redirect from Xbox Portable

Why did you redirect the Xbox Portable page from History of video game consoles (eighth generation) to Xbox? KuhnstylePro, his talk his contributions!

March 2012

An image or media file,User:KuhnstylePro/sig, has been removed from your userpage, user talk page, or other page because it was licensed as non-free. Wikipedia's non-free policy states that Copyrighted images under fair use are only allowed to be used in articles about the subject of the image, and only if no free equivalent is available. For example they are not allowed to be used on user pages, in lists, or (typically) in biographies of living people. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Wikipedia's non-free content policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of non-freeimages. Further use of these images will be considered vandalism, and shall be treated as such. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your signature

Please modify your signature according to Wikipedia:Signatures. Signatures can't contain images or templates. Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Clarification: You should copy the content of User:KuhnstylePro/sig to the signature part of the Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal page, and shouldn't use this subpage to transclude your signature to pages where you sign. Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 13:17, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

OK. KuhnstylePro (talk) 13:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Xbox (brand)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Xbox (brand). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Xbox (console). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Xbox (console) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Hello, I'm Figureskatingfan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sesame Street, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 01:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Xbox Portable Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Xbox Portable Logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Disney Channel Party Game Mania. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Can prove the game exists? Provide a url or other source. Regards, « ₣M₣ » 02:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Again, can prove the game exists? Provide a url or other source. « ₣M₣ » 15:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Aw, come one! Are you serious!? You could resist trying to ruin this! Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 15:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Xbox Portable Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xbox Portable Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Audrey Boneheads.png

Thanks for uploading File:Audrey Boneheads.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Xbox Portable Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Xbox Portable Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Xbox Portable Illustration.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xbox Portable Illustration.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. « ₣M₣ » 15:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Disney Channel Party Game Mania

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Disney Channel Party Game Mania, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cheetah255 (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinect Rush 2: A Cartoon Network Adventure

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kinect Rush 2: A Cartoon Network Adventure, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinect Rush 3: A Nicktoons Adventure

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kinect Rush 3: A Nicktoons Adventure, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Non-free content policy and guideline

Please do not place or replace any non-free images to any pages except for actual articles, as you have done at User:KuhnstylePro/sandbox/DreamWorks Animation and other of your sandbox pages. Such use is a clear violation of point number 9 of our policy concerning the use of non-free images. Continuing to do so can be viewed as disruptive behaviour and you may be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia

You added the word "Wikipedia" to templates in texts like "Please help by doing such and such". I have reverted this on two templates already, and will revert it again, if I see it on other templates. The reason is simply, that helping with those issues is helping not so much Wikipedia but all of its readers as well. In any case, this is not a standard formula, that we should have the word "Wikipedia" i it. Debresser (talk) 19:50, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Aw, now I'll never be able to put the word in templates. Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hadley Hudson

The article Hadley Hudson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Disney Channel Original Movies, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

If you want to merge 2 templates into another one, propose this at WP:TFD, make your case and gain consensus. So far you don't have it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:Disney Channel Original Movies

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Frietjes (talk) 22:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Xbox articles (various)

Please do not move articles by copy and pasting them, the instructions at WP:MOVE are clear on the matter "Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content," (their bolding). If you wish to create an Xbox brand article then you need to create a requested move in order to move the current Xbox console article. - X201 (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Captain Underpants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timothy Cahill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

The Kangaroo

May I please upload The Kangaroo logo? Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 01:50, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinect Rush 2: A Cartoon Network Adventure

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kinect Rush 2: A Cartoon Network Adventure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Disney Channel All Star House Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney Channel All Star House Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channel All Star House Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. « Ryūkotsusei » 00:34, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, most recently re-creating an unsuitable article, very likely a hoax, which had previously been deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JamesBWatson (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Hyphen

You have lately added hyphens to at least two maintenance templates in a way that is incorrect English. Please do not do so again. Debresser (talk) 19:27, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Now I'll never be able to do that again... Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 20:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I understand that you have been blocked only temporarily. I wish you happy editing afterwards. Debresser (talk) 20:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:KuhnstylePro/List of Boneheads episodes

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:KuhnstylePro/List of Boneheads episodes, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jonathan Albrardo Alexis Meza (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Apologies, you cannot delete userdrafts as hoaxes. Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Last Warning!

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Hadley Hudson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please do not add hoaxes. Dirt Pecker (talk) 18:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Calvin and Hobbes, you may be blocked from editing.

You seem to have a history of adding incorrect information, like claiming that an unreleased TV show had been nominated for three Emmys. Please stop. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 00:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Disney Channel Original Studios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney Channel Original Studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channel Original Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Axem Titanium (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:KuhnstylePro and persistent creation of WP:HOAX articles. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia as an inappropriate webhosting service for things you made up one day and creation of multiple hoax articles in userspace and in articlespace, leading to the conclusion that you are not here to help build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Please note also that if you continue to create hoax pages in your userspace your ability to edit your userspace will be revoked.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Boneheads (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boneheads (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boneheads (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boneheads

Template:Boneheads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:KuhnstylePro/sandbox/Disney Channel All Star House Party

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:KuhnstylePro/sandbox/Disney Channel All Star House Party, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:33, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Boneheads

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Boneheads, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ...William 13:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Bits & Pieces for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bits & Pieces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bits & Pieces until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:40, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KuhnstylePro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Alright. No more Wikipedia:Disruptive editing (WP:HOAX, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTHERE) for me. Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 23:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You'll need to convince us of your good intentions; just saying "I'll be good" won't cut it, given your bad behavior. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KuhnstylePro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to edit, please. Please unblock me. Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 16:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK - you've got the itch to edit. What were you planning to do? Peridon (talk) 17:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm planning not to edit disruptively. Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 13:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Also, I'm planning to improve Wikipedia. Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I just feel like I need to point out that your words sound real, real empty. "No more disruptive editing for me." "I want to edit, please." "I'm planning not to edit disruptively." "I'm planning to improve Wikipedia." It's easy to say things like that. They sound far from sincere, though. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 00:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KuhnstylePro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KuhnstylePro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block is unnecessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 03:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your long history of disruption suggests that this is not the case.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please list for us all the other accounts you have created. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KuhnstylePro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been creating too many sockpuppets, including:

• Crocigator
• Dirt Pecker
• User:Mr. Super Mario
• Sonic4Hire

Kuhnstyle Pro (talk) 16:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Ability to edit this page withdrawn -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2013

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Community ban

Per the unanimous consensus of the Wikipedia community, you have been banned from editing Wikipedia, under any account, or while logged out. If you wish to appeal this ban, please contact WP:BASC at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dinosaur Office

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dinosaur Office requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Everymorning (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KuhnstylePro, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KuhnstylePro, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

KATMAKROFAN (talk) 04:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)