User talk:Kukini/Archive22

Help Me

Hi there, I am a member of the abuse/reports volunteers for wikipedia i was wondering how do i accept a case to take on because i am unable to find anyone to help me with the subject. Chris19910 (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply: Warning Vandals

Odd... It appears the version of WP:HUGGLE I am using is not warning vandals... I apologize. ffm 16:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I've updated my software and no longer have that bug. I do some manual reverting occasionally... ffm 16:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

My reverting

I just wanted to ask you how I have been doing with the rollback tool and with the warnings that I've been giving out. Have I been doing a good job? Thanks, Razorflame (talk) 16:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

sorry, men

sorry.. --82.56.40.71 (talk) 16:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Repeat vandal

Hi, and thanks for your efforts at User talk:165.155.235.68. You blocked this IP yesterday, and less than 24 hours later he/she vandalized again at

1. 17:50, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) Brooklyn Technical High School‎
2. 14:32, 17 April 2008 (hist) (diff) List of Russians‎

I hope you can help. Thanks. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't me who changed your talk page ruairidhbevan

It wasn't me who changed your talk page it was a friend that found out my password —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruairidhbevan (talk • contribs) 04:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Secret pages

I have noticed that you have been interested in finding secret pages. As you may or may not know, Wiikipedia administrators are discussing whether or not to delete secret pages. I am complilng a petition against deleting secret pages here. If you are interested in saving secret pages, sign this page. Thank you. Together, we can beat the system!

Someone dedicated to making your day a little bit better! (talk) 11:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

PS: pass the message on!

Thanks!

Hi I just wanted to thank you for welcoming me! Trixie0143 (talk) 18:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Userpage

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Oore (talk) 03:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

You've been doing this for too long.

Thank you for your contribution to my talk page. Sadly I only glanced over it because of the bad case of Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V. If you're going to be 'helpful' like that, at least you could make it less obvious that you don't give a damn - because if you don't, why would I. That just concerns form though, and substance is a more serious issue. As I understand my changes were reverted on the sole reason that I did not fill in the summary field. Contrary to what you might believe, it is not necessary to do so. To quote from the summary field entry: "It is good practice". I understand the problem of vandalism at such open project as Wikipedia but not every IP out there is one. I'd assume you could at least see the changes made before reverting them. 81.15.202.133 (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VIII (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Delivered on 21:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Block

You just blocked an IP for a day. I think it should be longer. His attacks are fierce. Undeath (talk) 06:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

As a general rule I don't leave the "warning" tag on talk pages, largely because when dealing with an IP it is a moot point. Major vandals I list as IPVandals in the appropriate location. For the amount of time it would take me to add a "test" or "warning" tag to an IP login the slim chance of it even being viewed is not worth it in my eyes. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. I'll try to make a point of adding the tags more when applicable. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 20:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

aaa

aaaaaaaaaaa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.182.252 (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

JAN-MICHAEL SALVADOR LOVES KYRA SUVA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.182.252 (talk) 08:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Pagemove vandalism

Beware, you forgot something ;) -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:51, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry...I thought you beat me to fixing that. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 10:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Facts about El Naschie

Dear Mr. Kukini The user Nasr2000 changed the title of the article Naschie in to m.naschie and he makes it redirected from another title called Osa2000. This happened because the page has been appeared for deletion discussion. Cold you please warn this user about this? My Best Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faragali (talk • contribs) 12:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Dear Kukini

We need help. We have repeatedly asked that the intrusion and slandering to Prof. El Naschie's article be stopped and nothing has been done. There is a vehment, malicious attack on the person of Prof. El Naschie by enemies. We have complained before and nothing was done. There is a well organized and calculated attack on the credentials of Prof.El Naschie who is a well known engineer and scientist and his contributions are very well known in both engineering and physics. There are some jealous people who are green with envy and who want to destroy him and hence they are lashing out false statements about his contributions and underminig his publications. I am aware that you operate on a volunteer basis, hence the personnel have neither time nor the resources to verify all the false information that people with pseudo names and pseudo emails are making against him. How can a Ph.D. student claim that Prof. El Naschie is publishing in a not very wellknown journal. He is the editor-in-chief of a very famous journal which he founded and has a high impact factor in its field. Elsevier is the largest and most famous scientific publisher in the field. How can he claim that Prof. El Naschie is quoting himself hence he ranks high on Spires, Stanford University Library. It is all malicious, vindictive and must be stopped at once. Slanderers and hackers should not use wikipedia as a venue to attack others. Wikipedia's credibiity and reputation are at stake.

Due to the above, we request that you close Prof. El Naschie's wikipedia site completely.

Thank you in advance for all your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasr2000 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Edgeswhich

I noticed that you blocked Edgeswhich earlier today. Just wanted to let you know that this is an ongoing thing, Beganpick, Needstrain, 121.90.94.148 and many more.. Anybody using the line about ghosts and toast is probably a sockpuppet of User:Random-5000. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Muchas Gracias

... for reverting the violence done to my userpage. Keep fighting the good fight! Yunfeng (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Ain't no thang. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 14:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

d'oh!

My bad, I accidentally warned 68.98.209.85 for an edit to the sandbox, probably resulting in your block a bit later. I then felt bad for the harsh response since they only made one real vandal edit today. Care if I unblock? I can keep an eye on them for a bit and re-block if they keep it up. Either way, no big deal really. It's always a pleasure seeing you around Kukini, you do great work. Peace, delldot talk 16:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputes

Kukini, on the talk page of the conversion therapy article I recently asked you why you thought that my argument for limiting the use of the term gay (which basically was that 'Using the word 'gay' rather than 'homosexual' is a way of siding with homosexuals who are happy being homosexual against those who are not') was not convincing. I apologize if I expressed myself impolitely, but I think the question was a reasonable one and deserves an answer. Also, I would like to ask whether you intend to block me again the next time you find me engaged in an edit war, and why you seemed to be singling me out for some sort of special treatment in this regard. Skoojal (talk) 00:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

IP disruption

I've protected the talk page to prevent disruption as well continue to do on this talk page even when blocked and even if the page gets deleted no matter how much time it was deleted. Hopefully, he stop by then.--JForget 23:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Oops disregard the message then.--JForget 23:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Fun Lovin Criminals on Wikipedia

hello,

while i respect that Wikipedia is free and open. sombody has to monitor and control post in the discussion boards that reflect on the band in a bad way. petty arguments and personal threats should not be on here and defiantly not under the FLC name.

please respect my wishes

Kind regards Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.148.34.21 (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay…

I’m a little confused as to why all my contructive edits have been reverted as vandalism. Typical admin abuse.--Slowpoke is slooooow. (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Help me see how edits such as this are constructive. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 22:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Help me see how edits such as this, this, and this are constructive.--Slowpoke is slooooow. (talk) 22:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello Kukini

I'm the former 189.24.xxx.xxx and I've just registered on en.wikipedia. Sorry for some incovenience on some page, I do not remember what happened, but I think I might have done some mistake when I was copying the link of some picture to add it on an article on pt.wikipedia. Again sorry, and thanks for the welcomes! Diplodoco (talk) 02:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Restore?

I thought under Wikipedia:DRRC I had the right to remove comments that I have read and resolved. As with the comment by DoubleBlue, we worked out a small understanding and moved on. Thus, this shouldn't be a problem 24.18.240.159 (talk) 23:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Jesse McGuire

I've created my very first article on Wikipedia. It's about trumpet player Jesse McGuire. I've added the Wikiproject Arizona template to the articles talk page because he is from Arizona. I'm having problems finding info about him on the internet although I definetly believe he is notable enough to warrent his own article. I thought maybe people from his home state may be able to help. Regards --Npnunda (talk) 16:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Leslie

I am trying to build a page for Max Leslie or Maxwell Leslie, for his legacy. anything you can offer will be much appreciated.

thx, bt@BrianTaylor.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedski (talk • contribs) 08:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

SilkyShark editing stefan user pages

opps logged in with wrong user, Im having SUL issues and de:user:Stefan renamed his user [:de:user:St-fl]] (sysop 9000+ edits) 1 week before SUL was turned on for sysops and is now asking me to give up my account so that he can get the global, I have created a golbal account user:SilkyShark just to be able to talk on de without ip edits and managed to be logged in as that user on en when doing updates to the story. Please do not revert again if I continue to do misstaks like that. Also do you have any idea on how a issue like this could be resolved. I'm still talking to him and trying to get him to give up his account but I doubt that he will. and accourding to the few suggested polices I have seen I will loose my account, but to chnge a 9k+ edit account to a different name and claim that account 1 week before SUL was turned on for sysop is not really in the rule book and is a bit unfair I think. any suggestion on what I should do?? --Stefan ^talk 01:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Appeasement

Have you even looked at the trash being used as "sources"? Or is the boilerplate message on my talk page meant to troll? Just curious. Thanks. 129.71.73.243 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

• IP responded to on user talk page. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 18:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Why are you referring to the matter as "blanking" as if it is vandalism? I'm afraid your comments betray simple ignorance of the matter. Carroll Quigley is a conspiratorialist author who is not credible to many people, other than those who believe in the "Anglo-American elite" conspiracy to establishment world government--which is why Quigley is popular in Lyndon LaRouche circles (which attack Wikipedia articles frequently). The other sources are from Stalinist hacks, such as Ludo Martens, the Belgian Stalinist who made a last ditch effort to rehabilitate Uncle Joe's reputation in the 1990s with the very book that is being referenced to. One of them is a Soviet publication. You are affecting to allow this article to be citing the Soviet Union. Furthermore, the "sources" are being used to back up a small minority view stated in the most tendentious and generalized way possible as fact, leaving the reader to go on a goose chase through whole books to ostensibly see support for what they just read. I'm not aware of a Wikipedia policy which states that trash thrown onto an article should be kept for the fact that somebody threw it there.

For God's sake, people recognized this in the talk already. Since I've spent a comparatively inordinate amount of minutes (about ten) on something that would be self-evident to most people, I'll reprint this comment on the talk. But if you think I'm going to sit and have tea conversations with an anonymous Stalinist on reprinting propaganda to an ostensibly neutral encyclopedia, you are wrong. 129.71.73.243 (talk) 19:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Despite the previous intervention, I can not thank you enough for your kind understanding. In my experience(s) as an anonymous casual editor, it is not often that administrators take kindly to informed, assertive anonymous editors who are not evidently malicious and insane, and are attempting to slightly improve this online encyclopedia against the efforts of those who should be ascribed those categories. Thanks for not taking my criticism personally. 129.71.73.243 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 06:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Nontheists deletions

You just deleted most of the "List of nontheists" articles that were supposed to remain as ridirects as per the deletion discussion -- the point was to have the article history available for a merge to List of Atheists. It looks like someone replaced the original redirect with just the AfD notice, which caused them to be marked for speedy deletion. I noticed that, and it looks like I managed to salvage the first two before they were deleted, but you appear to have deleted the rest (along with, for some reason, List of atheists). Could you restore these articles as redirects so that they can be merged? Thanks. Klausness (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Whew...what a mess I made. So sorry about that...I think it is all back. Best, --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 16:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring them so quickly. Klausness (talk) 16:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, hmmm, it looks like another editor claims to have already done the merge. So that editor marked them for deletion, and then someone else noticed that the articles had nothing but a prod and so marked them for speedy deletion.... Not sure what the best way to proceed is. It'd probably be good to leave them around for a few more days so that other editors can check the first editor's work (especially since the editor claiming that the merge is done is the one who nominated the articles for deletion in the first place). Should we put a regular prod under the redirect (so the page still redirects)? Should the pages go to WP:Redirects for discussion so that they can be deleted in a few days? I guess whatever you think makes the most sense (or perhaps what another admin thinks is best, since I may have complicated your life enough here). Klausness (talk) 17:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I think I will defer to you and the others on this one. Best, Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 17:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

OK, we'll figure something out. Thanks. Klausness (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

My talk page

Thanks for the revert! E Wing (talk) 16:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

This newsletter was delivered by §hepBot around 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC). ShepBot (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting my talk page. Pinkadelica 19:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism revert

Thank you for undoing the vandalism to my talk page. Skoojal (talk) 22:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem! --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 23:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Requesting unblock for another user?

Hello, Kukini. An admin just blocked a certain Wikipedian, and I was wondering: is there some place on Wikipedia where I could plead for his unblock? --Kuaichik (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

queue pasa homey

welcoming my indifference? (from summ in your edit on my talk). I prob expressed some indifference (or at least some snarq) somewhere, but what was it you referenced? any-who, thx for the welkommen! 15:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to wikipedia

Thanks Rockaxiscourt (talk) 15:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

That was not a test edit, I wrongly typed the header, My last edit was in good faith, dont use templates as a response. Please assume good faith, see also WP:AGF. Thanks Rockaxiscourt (talk) 16:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

If it wasn't a test edit, then it was blatant vandalism, which may ultimately lead to blocking. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 16:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Best to block me now, because I don't like the foreign language in your namespace, this is english WP, not whatever gabeldigook language you have in your signature. Best wishes (hoping that you will remove your foreign slogan) Rockaxiscourt (talk) 16:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop trolling. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 16:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Edit warring across multiple articles

Kukini, an editor called Whistling42 has been going through numerous different articles and changing "reparative therapy" to "conversion therapy." In some cases, such as the article about Exodus International, this involves misrepresentation of the sources that the articles are based upon, which refer to reparative therapy, not conversion therapy. I changed the article so that Exodus were quoted directly, in the hope of ending this dispute, but Whistling42 removed the quote and reintroduced the misleading reference to "conversion therapy." Several of these articles have already been changed back and forth several times, and there is no end in sight. Please intervene and do something to stop the spreading chaos. Skoojal (talk) 23:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the contact, but to me, this whole thing smacks too much of a battle of POV. Also, from what I have seen, you have been changing conversion therapy to reparative therapy. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 23:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

This isn't mainly about POV. It's about using sources properly. How, if a source talks about "reparative therapy" and does not use the expression "conversion therapy", is it appropriate to use this source to say that an organization favours "conversion therapy"? A direct quote is a perfectly sensible way to settle disputes of this sort, and Knulclunk agreed with me about this, but Whistling42 nonetheless insisted on changing the article back. Skoojal (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I will leave to y'all to iron out. Do your best to work with others and continue to build consensus on talk pages. This part of your efforts is very useful and important...ultimately leading to the best articles. Thanks, --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 00:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if you saw these...

... and I don't know if you wanted to, but I came across Kukini message and Message to kukini from me. I am not an admin, so I can't see them, but I just wanted to say "kudos" because if you're getting attack pages, you must be doing an excellent job.

Keep up the good work, have a wonderful evening, and may the vandals fail... J.delanoy^gabs_adds 00:21, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

A word far too long to be put in the header

Concerning your recent deletion of Lopadotemachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrimhypotrimmatosilphioparaomelitokatakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektryonoptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoiosiraiobaphetraganopterygon, I was just wondering what the reasoning behind it was. I could not find a recent AFD for it, and the last one ended in a decision to keep. Just curious and sorry to bother. Many thanks. Atelaes (talk) 00:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I have corrected my error. Happy editing, Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 13:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I hate to be the guy who receives something and then complains that it's not good enough, but would you be willing to restore the talk page as well? Someone else deleted it because it was orphaned. Thanks again. Atelaes (talk) 18:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

ip user you blocked

IP user that you have blocked temporarily before and whose talk page for the past two years has only warnings is back and I have to revert his disruptive edits. Can this user be blocked for good? I am talking about User:82.117.194.34. Thanks --Avala (talk) 22:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

...I feel so important now :-)  Frank  |  talk  18:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Been there, done that...

...now you have the T-shirt!

Wooo!!! Thanks, Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 19:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Logitech95

Hi, Kukini, I saw you reverted User:Logitech95's POV blanking. Can you look at his/her contribution because the account seems to push his Japanese POV without no source, or altering a death toll unlike cited information or just want to stir up Japan-Korea related article. I guess 128.120.161.137 (talk · contribs) is also the editor's IP address, given that almost similar POV and timing. I think this edit is made in bad faith. The article has a history for Japanese anon's vandalism last February when a big fire incident occurred. The editor made such edit right after receiving warnings by me for his blanking. On Korea under Japanese rule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), he/she blanked info regarding Japanese war crimes and inserted very POV info with no source as well to look Koreans. The account was created the last month, so I think the anon needs to get some suitable warning from admins. Thanks. --Caspian blue (talk) 04:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

… for all this work. I never thought I was prominent enough to inspire the creation of an anti-me. Deor (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Shoujo edit

Hi. I'm new to Wikipedia editing (just started today!), but not to shoujo manga. About your edit today, could I suggest some minor alterations? You wrote:

"In the early 50s, shoujo manga was created by beginning male mangaka, who would write shoujo for a time but then write shonen as their career became solid."

I'm afraid this could be misunderstood as meaning that male mangaka invented shoujo manga in the 50s. "beginning" as an adjective might also be confusing for some. (I had to reread it myself to figure out what you meant.) How about something like this?

"Throughout the 1950s, the vast majority of shōjo manga were made by younger male manga artists, who would work in the genre until they had established themselves and then, generally, move over to shōnen manga."

Sound better?

I am actually hoping to rewrite the whole history section, because as it stands it is a confusing series of disconnected and contradictory sentences. I also plan to add plenty of citations.

Just thought I should consult before going ahead and changing something you just contributed.

Cheers

Matt Thorn (talk) 13:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

• Edit away...tho I didn't write about manga...I left you a welcome message to help you learn your way around. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 13:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Help?

Hello, Kukini. An RfC regarding the conduct of Bogdangiusca is taking place here. However, it is not listed here, for some reason.

Any idea why it isn't there, even though the RfC exists? Should it be added there manually? --Kuaichik (talk) 00:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Never mind, it's been fixed now. --Kuaichik (talk) 21:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter (July 2008)

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Invitation

~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 18:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO

You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the projects WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi

If any vandals vandalise my page can you revert them? Thanks. Tharnton345 06:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I want to know why exactly my 'Vizzed Flash Bash' article was taken down and if I could get the HTML for it. Took about 3 hours to put that page together and the game has taken me hundreds of hours to develop (kinda disrespectful to take it down).

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davideo7 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

Just FYI, vandalism from this IP address has resumed. →Wordbuilder (talk) 16:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages

Hello. You obviously thought I had deleted it. See here or below, and also the names of the sections in my talk page. Also, it distinctly says on the talk page I occasionally use the specified IP address. I'm not using the account even though it's mine, because not only would I not be able to edit, but I'd also autoblock the IP address.--212.159.64.14 (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean

Question? What do you mean by "question"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.229.5 (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

No idea what this user is talking about. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 17:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

British English on Kingdom Now theology

As the Kingdom Now theology page is about an American phenomenon, the American spelling is more fitting, but the British spelling of fulfilment is not a typo. Aunt Entropy (talk) 03:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah...but in an article about an American phenomenon, the British spelling IS incorrect as would be American spelling in an article about a British phenomenon. Regardless, my use of the term "typo" in the edit summary is not a good reason to revert the correction, particularly without clarification provided as to the rationale of the revert. Happy editing, Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 14:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)