Kymacpherson

Poker project

Thanks for the helpful edits to the poker articles. You might want to consider joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poker project. Thanks.--Toms2866 15:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Kymacpherson, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

• Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
• Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
• Create a User page.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Add yourself to the New user log.
• Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
• Be bold!
• Use the Show preview button
• Provide an Edit summary.

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax ^τεχ 01:39, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Edit summaries/minor edit flag

Hi, please fill in edit summaries with a description of your change. Wikipedia:Edit summary says:

Always fill the summary field.

(Emphasis in the original.) While I'm at it, I see you flagged your changes to WP:RfD as a minor edit. Use of this flag for that edit was inappropriate. Help:Minor edit gives guidelines on when it's appropriate to use that flag; please follow them. And before you say that in your opinion, your change was minor, please note that that page says:

consider the opinions of other editors when choosing this option

so whether you think they are minor is less important than what other editors think. Noel (talk) 3 July 2005 15:56 (UTC)

• Your recommendations are welcome, but I'm not sure why you would presuppose what I will say in response to them. Kymacpherson 4 July 2005 00:00 (UTC)

RE: Crandell Addington

Thanks for pointing that out. Red Director 19:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Revert in addition to reporting please

Re: this AIV report, reverting the vandalism is even more important than reporting it. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Just for the record,

There is no such thing as "official policy space". The Wikipedia namespace contains a LOT of things, 99% of which are not in any way "official policy". >Radiant< 16:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Vertical Cave Photo

Hi, I saw your vertical cave photo on the caving article, and was wondering what cave that picture is from. Amazingracer 15:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

• In the spirit of cave conservation, I intentionally omitted the name of the cave from the photo description; I hope you understand! But judging from your recent wikipedia contributions I would hazard a guess that you live in the atlanta area, in which case I have some recommendations, if you want to learn more about caving in the area: Georgia Tech University has a program called ORGT (Outdoor Recreation @ Georgia Tech) that offers caving classes that teach about equipment, safety, rope skills, etc; and it was actually through this program that I got involved in caving myself when I lived in atlanta. Also there is the Dogwood City Grotto, a group of caving enthusiasts that meet regularly in the atlanta area. —Kymacpherson 00:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Draw poker terms

I'm not at all convinced that "12-way" and "16-way" draw poker terms are "self-evident". In fact I'm convinced of quite the opposite: 90% of poker players don't even think in terms of "outs" at all--so much so that they still use terms like "open ended" in hold'em and stud to which the term doesn't really apply, and I hear people all the time saying they had "two ways" to win when they really mean 8 outs, or 6 outs, or even 12 outs with a straight and flush draw. Plus, California draw poker itself is something of a rarity these days, so I think it's important to preserve significant terms from historically important games that one doesn't see on TV. I'm quite sure that if I told some story at work (I'm a casino floor manager) about a "16-way draw", maybe 4 or 5 out of 100 old-timers would know what I was talking about--but such draws are critically important to the strategy of that particular game, so I think the terms are important enough to include. --LDC 19:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

• I would think you could educate the public on these topics more effectively by editing Out (poker) or Draw poker than by adding very specific situational descriptions to the glossary. In fact I recall you removing a term I added to the same page with the claim that it was too specific [1] —Kymacpherson 21:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that's another way to do it. I'll move them to Out (poker). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee Daniel Crocker (talk • contribs) 21:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk:The Old 81

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:The Old 81, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:The Old 81 is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:The Old 81, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Poker Player Notability

The WP:POKER is discussing what we believe constitutes notability for poker players. We have a proposal on our talk page, if you'd like to chime in, please do so here.Balloonman (talk) 10:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guggenheim Guadalajara

Hello! I have nominated Guggenheim Guadalajara for deletion. You can comment on the deletion proposal here. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kymacpherson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kymacpherson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kymacpherson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)