User talk:LAX/Archive 7

Latest comment: 16 years ago by NimiTize in topic Thank You and...
LAX 
 "I reject your edits and substitute my own." | Talk Page ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ) | Contributions ( edit count )
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
← Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 →

Whats up

Look at the NWO nomination for FL page, do you get what the opposer is saying?--TrUCo-X 01:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads-up. I'll do the same. Are you logging off? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I nominated Unforgiven, if you wanted to know or not. And, have fun watching Raw. ;) I'll talk to you tomorrow. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:OWN

Please see the respective commetns I left User:Nimitize and User:Cimmo about Cimmo's incorrect accusations of violating WP:OWN. It is better explained there. Cheers, Alex T/C Guest Book 01:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

the phil theis page you messaged me about

yeah man, i'm sorry about that. i tried to fix it after i hit save page but it didn't save again. i worded it wrong and didn't want the bold letters. i tried removing the bold letters and to reword it but once again, wasn't saving. so i apologize. i was trying to put something he said "in character" in one of his own youtube vids on the page and didn't know where to put it in the article. i think that should be mentioned in the article though whether it's in character or not because he has asked his fans to do this. so maybe in the article it could say, lately (or recently) phil theis has attempted to get back into the wrestling business and is asking for help from fans of his work in an almost picketing type of manner. or something like that. none the less, it should be in there. because what he is doing lately is important to the life and career of the man himself and has everything to do with or to be put in the article. so once again, i apologize for the way it came out on the article and i tried to fix and honestly understand how you could take that as vandalism, but it really wasn't. maybe it could have come of that way because, i put it in the wrong section, worded it a little wrong, and because of the bold letters. but i think i worded it a little better hear on your talk page and truly believe that it should be put in the article. the article hardly has anything about him on youtube and that has made the guy a bigger star than ever. what is the deal with that? if someone had no idea who phil theis or damien demento was and they looked at his wikipedia article for research the would be greatly ripped off because the article is so out of date. just like a TV shows character's page gets updated every week after every new show, or a wrestler's page gets updated after every new angle, so should damien demento's. make no sense and is extremely biased. just my personal opinion and i'm all ready aware about how PC you are and that you don't agree with it. so i'd like to once again apologize beforehand.

RE:

Its no problem at all. As I know, you've been busy. Would you like for me to help you in any projects? Thank you for your for acknowledging my progress. Zenlax T C S 19:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You got it. Can you possibly read over Vengeance (2005) and inform me if it reads well? Zenlax T C S 19:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Was Jonathan Coachman the RAW General Manager at the time? Zenlax T C S 19:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Your welcome. Also, in the sentence that says Cena faced off against Carlito on RAW, did Orton make a run-in to interfere in the match? Zenlax T C S 20:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good. I was a bit confused, but I've read the report and it stated that Orton was at ringside. One thing does stand out in the article; you tend to mention one month before SummerSlam, it might not be a problem, but you do tend to mention it a lot in the report. I would fix it, but you did indeed ask for opinion on the article, and its your decision if you would like to make the change or not. But overall, the article looks great. Good work, my friend. :) Zenlax T C S 20:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome. It will be a thrill to see SummerSlam become a Good article; you've done a fine job with the article. I'd like to apologize for not contributing my time to you and the rest of the members with Unforgiven (2004), as I saw that all of you put in your hard work into the article. Zenlax T C S 20:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Indeed true. But, I would like to add the userbox for Vengeance; whenever the article looks right for Good article. Can I have your input on Vengeance? Zenlax T C S 20:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for responding. Do you think I should notify the WP:PW community for their input? Zenlax T C S 21:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please vote again, the pay-per-views that were bolded have been "rejected." Please do the same thing, and bold the pay-per-view you would not like to do, out of the remaining pay-per-views left. iMatthew 2008 22:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

what blog?

even when it's the person's own?

Thank you

Thanks for the barnstar. I enjoy doing copyediting for members of the project, so I try to help out with any articles that are about to be nominated for GA. I'll do my best to make sure I go over the other two before the end of the week. Best wishes, and good luck with the nomination. I'm fairly confident that it will pass once a few minor changes are made. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I made the change for #9, as I didn't explain it well and it was a minor thing. As for #6, it seems strange that Porter and Hardy went from being rivals to being teammates with no explanation. Did they get along as teammates, or was this just WWE pairing up people who didn't like each other once again? GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Another thing I wanted to mention is that the source you gave for the Booker-Cena match in the Aftermath section doesn't support the statement. The source only discusses what happened after the match, and it doesn't mention the interference or the disqualification. I've been looking for a source, but I'm not really sure where to find reliable sources for recent matches. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You've done a great job with the fixes for SummerSlam. Perhaps for #6, an explanation could be worked into the text ("Despite their rivalry, WWE paired up Hardy and MVP, who defeated Deuce 'N Domino to retain the WWE Tag Team Championship the following month at Unforgiven."). GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry about that. I just realized that I forgot about that question. I'll look it over right now. GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
What about adding a paragraph to summarize the Aftermath? That way, the lead would truly summarize the entire article. It could be something like:
Several of the existing feuds carried on after the event. Notably, CM Punk continued to face John Morrison, defeating him for the ECW Championship the following month. The day after SummerSlam, Orton interfered in a match between Cena and King Booker and intensified the feud by attacking Cena's father. Khali and Batista faced each other at Unforgiven, the following pay-per-view, as part of a triple threat match; Batista was victorious in this match and won the World Heavyweight Championship.
What do you think? GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem. Like I said, I am more than willing to help when I have time. I sometimes worry that people take what I say the wrong way, so I hope that my suggestions have come across as constructive feedback rather than criticism. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I think it should be good enough to pass a GA Review. I can't forsee any problems. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, that's definitely the most frustrating part of the system. I just had an article that I wrote make it into the list of the "Five oldest unreviewed nominations" today. I did my first GA review today, and I'm trying to encourage other editors to do the same so that we can cut down on the backlog in the "Sports and recreation" list. And you never know...the first article I nominated for GA was reviewed within a couple of hours. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I believe that you originally mentioned your intention to nominate the article last Saturday, so tomorrow should be fine. I'll also admit to a little impatience on my part, as I gave my notice to nominate WrestleMania X last Friday, but I want you guys to nominate SummerSlam, Unforgiven and No Way Out first, as I've already got SummerSlam (1994), Jos LeDuc and Ion Croitoru nominated. (That's impatience at waiting for your one week to end, not impatience at any of you, but it's good to stick to the policy, as it's been working well so far.) Let's hope the review process can speed up a bit, though. As I mentioned, it would be great if anyone from The Kliq could find time to review a "Sports and recreation" article, as it would speed things up for us. I just finished reviewing an article, and I found the process to be very educational. Anyhow, best wishes for SummerSlam. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can look SummerSlam 2004 over, but it might take a couple of days before I'm able to get to it. Have you given notice on the WP:PW talk page for it? I've already promised Zenlax that I would look over Vengeance 2005 next, and Truco asked me to copyedit No Way Out 2004. I've also got an article that I'm in the middle of writing, and I haven't gotten to it in a couple of days now. Between Pre-GA reviews and completing a GA review, I'm a little burnt out and I might need to take a day off before committing to doing much more right away. Like I said, I'm happy to help and I think it's great that project members are getting articles ready to nominate. I will get to it soon, though. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

PPV

Sure. Damn IP's. Hey, is Cimmo really working on Survivor Series '04? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh. Would you like to make that PPV our next project? Or are you still busy? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Awesome. ;) Question: How would I write, for the lead, that Cena won an I Quit match after JBL quit? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Judgment Day. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nice. Thanks for the feedback. Oh, is ECW already airing? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay, so I did the right thing by reverting this edit? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cool. Just needed to know. Since its 7 over here. We still on for Unforgiven '06? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, how 'bout this weekend? I know your going to be busy with SummerSlam and stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Well, I'll leave you in peace so you can watch ECW. Talk to you tomorrow. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Don't forget to give me a recap. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the loop. Now, I don't have to watch ECW. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, since it was "bolded" off the Kliq list. And, I really need to work on one by myself. Like you with Rumble '01 and SummerSlam '07. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Really? That's cool. Which one do you have in mind? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You should go with Bad Blood. Pretty crazy PPV and you can talk about the first ever Hell in a Cell match. But, that's just me. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Two minds think alike. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

To avoid another round of voting, please go back to The Kliq's talk page and bold a second PPV you would not like to do. After this we will have three nominations remaining. Thanks! iMatthew 2008 11:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aw Darn, why did you bold Survivor Series 2006? iMatthew 2008 21:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh. ok. iMatthew 2008 21:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, very badly. But it's ok. I want to work on something everyone agrees on. My top choice of the ones left is SummerSlam 2005. iMatthew 2008 21:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Blue, Zenlax, and Truco just need to bold one more PPV each, then we can get into the final round of voting. iMatthew 2008 22:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It looks fine. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hold on. I'll read through it again. I'm at work that's why. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay, is it really notable to add that tickets went on sale Dec. 30 and sold in 40mins.? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also, I think the refs. are a problem to the kilobytes. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, sorry about that. I didn't see it. Hey, is the Chavo and Rey thing really notable? Cause, I just had a test and the kilobytes went from 47 to 44. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I tried the test for a reason. Did Gary say to expand the lead more? Hey, now I'm telling you what Truco told me. You go too much into detail in the matches. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
For reals? That's what I'll use when he confronts me about the PPV's I write. Who's going to go over it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, nice. You got a burn. ;) Well, Gary is helpful. I'll ask him if he can give Unforgiven a review check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've added two comments to the Pre-GA Review. iMatthew 2008 02:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Forget it, I guess I don't know what I'm saying. iMatthew 2008 02:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I, ThinkBlue, would like to award both LAX and GaryColemanFan this barnstar for all their efforts put into SummerSlam (2007). Good job, guys. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
P.S. The lead is well written. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know, its good to know that what you do gets appreciated. ;) Are you going to wait a week to nominate SS? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Do you know what's the link to "full body choke"? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I Think This Should Be Deleted

I have no idea how to nominated things for AfD, so i thought I'd ask you. Mr. All-Powerful Admin! ;) OVW Television Champion is the exact same as OVW Television Championship, and from what I can tell, the "OVW Television Champion" one was copied and pasted from the Championship article. Without the editor even going into the edit window. *Sigh* Anyway, thought I'd let ya know, so you could flex those admin muscles. I think you could probably "speedy delete" this, but I'll leave it up to you. Peace, and happy editing! ♥NiciVampireHeart04:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I will. Thanks! ♥NiciVampireHeart04:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 10 3 March 2008 About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties Eleven users apply for bureaucratship 
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas Role of hidden categories under discussion 
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected 
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing" News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones 
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article WikiProject Report: Football 
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

70.253.196.2

Is the IP qualified for a block? Since, the IP continues adding inappropriate sentences in the Sandbox? Zenlax T C S 21:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for handling the situation. I knew to ask you; your the right person for the job. Zenlax T C S 21:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You are quite welcome. I take it that you won't be available for expanding Bad Blood? Zenlax T C S 21:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've seen the list grow shorter. Zenlax T C S 14:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No. Complete your list and inform me that you've done all your tasks and we can begin expanding Bad Blood. Zenlax T C S 20:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Everything looks great. Though, the Cena and Orton aftermath seems quite odd; you write that Orton interfered in a match involving Cena and Booker T, in which Cena won. Where exactly was Cena's father? Was he in the ring with Cena? It might become a confusion statement to the reader. But overall, it looks fantastic. Zenlax T C S 21:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
All you need is to clear it up. After you've done that, you have yourself a nice reading article. :) Zenlax T C S 21:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't see why not. Its well-written. Are those your plans of nominating SummerSlam to Feature article? Zenlax T C S 21:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I think SummerSlam will be a great addition to the Good article category. It would, however, be better if it became Feature article. Zenlax T C S 21:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please do. I wouldn't want you to listen to my message and have SummerSlam fail Feature article, because of my reasoning. Do notify me if you either go with Good article or Feature article so I can help you in anyway. Zenlax T C S 18:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good idea. Do you now approximately when we can be done with Backlash? Zenlax T C S 20:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes. I was reading some reports and it doesn't seem that Edge and Kane had a big feud. So, just stay with the first two feuds. Unless, you want to add it. Zenlax T C S 20:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I trust your judgment. Is there anything that you would like for me to do? Only reason I ask, I have nothing to work on. Zenlax T C S 20:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is this an acceptable article? Zenlax T C S 21:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for clarifying that. Zenlax T C S 21:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you undelete Jeroen van Veen (pianist) please?

I've been editing wikipedia since 2005, but haven't encountered the following oddity yet. I split up a page describing two equally notable and googlable people with the same name (Jeroen van Veen). These unrelated people existed together on that same page for a year, having nothing in common but the same name. After my split, and my edit summary said where the text came from, a user (who by now has apologized for it) tagged one page for speedy deletion within a minute. I don't know the pianist, but he is prize winning and made dozens of recordings, and is also a composer, producer, artistic director, etc., while the copied text contained 5 links to websites describing his activities. I mentioned this on the talk page and removed the tag, as the speedy deletion tag seemed without merit and one could consider it even vandalism. Nevertheless, within a few more minutes you went ahead and deleted the page based on the unspecified tag alone. How come? Feels like guilty-unless-proven-innocent followed by-shoot-before-you-ask to me. A very counterproductive procedure. Could you revert the delete please? Afasmit (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Isn't it sad

Isn't it sad.--TrUCo-X 02:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I felt horrible writing the article as a defunct championship..lol--TrUCo-X 02:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely great, just one thing, i just feel a little edgy on the aftermath in the lead..--TrUCo-X 22:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is it good for it to be in the lead? I mean you repeat alot of the aftermath in the lead and then in the aftermath section, but if its good for the article then leave it. --TrUCo-X 22:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh if thats the case, then leave it. But I think it is a future FA, no doubt about it.TrUCo-X 22:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I recommend you first make sure it passes GA, because Lex, tried to nominate New Year's Revolution (2007) for FA before nominating if for GA, and it failed. Also I think if I nominated NWO 04 straight to FA, It would have failed, look at the nom page now, one objection and then no more responses. Take it to GA, then FA.TrUCo-X 22:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Would you like to help me make List of WCW Hardcore Champions an FLC?TrUCo-X 03:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

My recent edit to RAW

I dont know if am correct, but on WWE.com, per here, it says "Monday Night Raw’s special three-hour episode celebrating its 15th anniversary drew an incredible 4.4 rating last Monday night on USA Network", it was a 4.4, and in the older version (Before I changed it), it says 4.1, and according to WWE its 4.4, and isnt WWE.com really the most reliable source there can be? NimiTize 02:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to look for another reliable one, thanks for telling me. NimiTize 02:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm trying to get it on PWWEW if they have a summary of it, but theres no index to RAW--2007. NimiTize 02:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Crawley Town FC

Hi LAX - Help - Confused! I work for Crawley Town FC and yesterday tried to update our Wikipedia entry to be told I was Vandalising the page!!!

The Chairman, Victor Marley, has just tried to change it again - if you want to verify us please call the football club!

The information on there before is incorrect and has some serious allegations and inaccurate statements.

Many Thanks

AD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.86.187 (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tomko's turn is notable

I disagree with the idea that Tomko turning back heel and rejoining the Angle Alliance is all of a sudden non-notable in his article. If this turn and his entire time in the Alliance from that point on is brushed out of his article, someone could read up on it a year or so from now and think Tomko's character stayed independent when in fact he cemented a position in what "was at the time" (as the language will be) the most powerful heel stable in TNA. The articles on Christian's Coalition, the Angle Alliance, and the tag team of A.J. Styles and Tomko certainly haven't seen that information reverted ten thousand times on the personally-I-think-its-application-here-is-ridiculous basis of "non-notability". So how can that be the case on the article for Travis Tomko himself? 172.168.107.202 (talk) 00:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

At this point, it is considered not notable. --Cheers, LAX 00:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: SummerSlam

I'd say it is ready. Nikki311 00:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think you should. If nobody follows a policy, what is the point of having it? Nikki311 00:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your excellent contributions to Wiki and for stopping vandalism from over exceeding, I award you The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar. SexySeaShark 17:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Originial research

The exact some content in a neater matter is original research? Well, ok...if you want an article to look like a 6-year-old typed it, no hair off my ass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvp119 (talkcontribs) 20:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

A few Announcements

Cross posted to all Kliq members

As you may or may not have noticed on The Kliq's talk page, I have added two temporary sections. In "Last Minute Nominations," you are free to add any pay-per-view nominations that you have recently thought of or forgot about earlier. If you have any, please add them. If you do not, please just write none, in that section, so we know that you've seen it at least. Also, in "Bring 'Em Backs," you can choose one pay-per-view that has been voted out, and bring it back into the running. All you have to do it choose the pay-per-view and add it to the "Bring 'Em Backs" section. If you would not like to bring back any pay-per-view, please again, write none, so we know you've seen it. Cheers! iMatthew 2008 21:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey, since no one responded on the talk page. Is it ok to create a template for defunct wwe titles, I created 2 examples in my sandbox. Also, how does List of WCW Hardcore Champions look so far (with the sourcing)?TrUCo-X 22:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I though you would have brought WM 13 back. iMatthew 2008 22:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, ok. iMatthew 2008 22:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
So I should go ahead and create it? Can you do some copy-editing for NWO 2004, as requested in its FA nomination, I am not to good with that, that's if you are able to do so.TrUCo-X 22:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, its cool. I linked it to a simple "choke". Are we still on for Unforgiven '06 this weekend? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, and I will.--TrUCo-X 22:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm still down. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry, you'll be able to display the FA box, when I nominate Unforgiven '04 and hopefully passes FA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Wait, are you saying that SummerSlam is better than Unforgiven? Explain --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh..... well, you got me. And, here I was trying to cheer you up with adding an FA box to your page and you throw this in my face. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was just kidding. You know I was kidding, right? Um, maybe next month. What do you think? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cool. Cause, right now I don't think I can nominate it, cause of school and stuff. But, by next month, I'll have free time. Man, was high school hard for you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No wonder. Is the college life killing you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Interesting. Are you still working on SummerSlam? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh. Your not working on anything? P.S. Do you have an e-mail? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

E-mail Matt, cause its something related to the Kliq. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, cause its something both me and him have been thinking about. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Right. So, what do you think we should do? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
True. We should ask Truco what he thinks. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, I left him a message. Hey, do you think you can help with adding refs. to the WWE Hardcore list? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nah, its cool. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good for you. ;) Do you think it might be a future GA? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
True. What feuds are you going to work on? For SummerSlam '04. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That should be easy. I won't ask, if you need help, since you can handle it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's cool. Do you think Gary might be able to give us a pre-GA for SummerSlam '04 tomorrow? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have faith in you. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem. I'm pretty sure you had faith in Unforgiven passing GA. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. ;) You write PPV's well too. We do need to work on a new PPV. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 05:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cool. And, Not ME. Which one do you have in mind? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 05:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's fine. We're following the pattern. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 05:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good to me. ;) And, my e-mail should work. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, my bad. Okay, now I fixed it. Try now. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
How does this list of people who held this title made up of duct tape look so far?TrUCo-X 18:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its cool and I've replied. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I replied. Check again. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Are you serious? I replied from the message you sent me. Try logging off and logging on. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, it was working fine when me and Matt we're talking. I sent you nother e-mail. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. I'll send you my original message. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Replied. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
'Nother reply. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. What are you going to work on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, SummerSlam. Good job. Don't worry, I'll source it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem, amigo. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry, I won't. I'm adding refs. to the Hardcore list. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
NWO failed FA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, that's why I want to wait a little, until I nominate Unforgiven for FA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. Gary was telling me about that yesterday. Do you think we should notify the Village people? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can't image either. What should be tell them? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, Truco just asked me what category "this" fits in. So.... How's SummerSlam? '06 --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cool. Hey, this guy is vandalizing. Can you do something? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Alright, cool. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WM XXIV poster

Maybe he might listen to you since you are an admin, but there is an issue at Image:WrestleManiaXXIVposter.JPG. The uploader keeps removing the tag I placed. The problem is he is trying to say he can release the image under the GNU license (basically releasing it into the public domain) even though the image is copyrighted by WWE but he keeps removing the disputed license tag I placed. TJ Spyke 23:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, they are italicized.

A PPV event, just like any other TV show, needs to be italicized. 71.202.242.152 (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow is this IP wrong, anyway, the hardcore title list is done. You think we should nominate it for FL, or first see what the WP:PW community says?--TrUCo-X 00:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I have alerted the WP:PW community, should I wait for responses, or should I go ahead and nominate it now?--TrUCo-X 01:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
ok, and its ok. We got the job done =)--TrUCo-X 01:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If there are some things to be done with during its nomination and if you fix them and it passes then you can display, if not, we can always work on another list.--TrUCo-X 01:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well dont you remember we were originally to work on improving List of WWE Hardcore Champions but I guess we gave up, how about me, you, Blue, and mayby Zenlax and/or iMatthew, we all expand it?TrUCo-X 01:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Want to start now?TrUCo-X 01:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright lets go for it.TrUCo-X 01:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its ok, I understand.TrUCo-X 04:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem.TrUCo-X 04:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Got it, I replied. TrUCo-X04:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I replied.--TrUCo-X 04:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Although, "Jeff Hardy" is doing an excellent job. iMatthew 2008 13:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I will not be available much today. I have to go now, because I hae a rehearsal for the next four hours. Then I'll be home for about 4 or 5 hours, then I'm going out for the night. So, I'll be on as much as I can in those 4-5 hours I'm home. iMatthew 2008 13:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I replied via email. ♥NiciVampireHeart14:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, that makes sense. Alright then, I don't have a problem with it. ♥NiciVampireHeart14:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I appreciate it. ♥NiciVampireHeart15:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey, just making sure you know that this isn't going to be The Kliq's last project. It's D.M.N. and bulletproof's last project with us. iMatthew 2008 18:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Last Minute Nominations" and "Bring 'Em Backs" have closed. Please go back to the Kliq page and vote for the next round. P.S. I heard Batista was removed from the roster page, and was released. iMatthew 2008 18:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Anything you need help with? I have nothing to do. iMatthew 2008 19:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I recommended that we have fifteen questions, and the following fifteen users answer one questions each: Me, You, Truco, Blue, Nici, Zenlax, Hybrid, Chronic, Nikki, Alex, D.M.N, Gavyn Sykes, Naha, GCF, and TJ Spyke, Now that I think about it, it is way too much for one interview. lol. iMatthew 2008 12:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes I do. I'm going to review one today. iMatthew 2008 12:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
AMP Energy NHL Winter Classic iMatthew 2008 12:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's ok. And I plan on starting, well, now. lol. iMatthew 2008 12:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've passed the article. iMatthew 2008 13:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I might do another later on today, but I don't know which one yet. iMatthew 2008 13:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you please look over this week's newsletter, and read my new thread at WT:PW. Thanks! iMatthew 2008 14:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You don't think theres any more current news? Is Maria in playboy notable for the newsletter? iMatthew 2008 14:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jeroen van Veen (pianist) 2

You cannot just copy and paste what I gave you back onto the article space. I told you to signify his importance, and you still haven't done that. I will give you 7 days to either improve the article, or signify why he is important. If you cannot expand the article any further or fail to signify his importance, I will once again delete it per CSD A7. Sorry for saying "signify his importance" so many times. --Cheers, LAX 11:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please read before you write. I did not just copy and paste, but added two third-party external links. The text should've been sufficient because it showed that he is notable according to the current notability guidelines, having released two or more albums on a major label (point 5) and having won in a major music competition (point 9). Still, I've added some text on his international concerts and recitals and recording activity. He is also likely "the most prominent representative of minimal music" in his city (Utrecht) (point 7) and possibly in his country. I should not be forced to write and defend a bio when simply splitting up an article describing two people. Afasmit (talk) 00:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

NN?

What does that mean?--CiNnAmonCrUchy 22:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Inactive

Sorry for me being inactive for a long time am not slacking off or anything, my bro was in a car injury and I was inactive for a while, sitting at the doctors worry for my brother. I will be active around 3-6 pm Monday-Thursday and Friday I'll be active all day and more. Sorry for this. NimiTize 23:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re:

yes.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 15:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It can be accessed through a search you know that. That's how I got them.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 18:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
This is my account. http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii47/WCWJungle/--CiNnAmonCrUchy 18:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you still want the link here it is: http://s218.photobucket.com/albums/cc5/Monnitewars/--CiNnAmonCrUchy 18:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I still see no proof.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 20:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WM XIX

Not to sound like a dick, but are you ever going to complete the AM for RAW for WrestleMania XIX? Or do you want me to do it?--TrUCo-X 18:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've sent you an e-mail. iMatthew 2008 18:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I just re-sent it. iMatthew 2008 18:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Replied. iMatthew 2008 18:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Same here. iMatthew 2008 18:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well It's done now. I feel the Booker T/HHH feud doesn't need an AM, there wasn't much build up to it IMO.TrUCo-X 19:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
See here. iMatthew 2008 19:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yup. iMatthew 2008 19:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

So, was the secret exposed? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, right. Well, I agree with you about his "connection", but like you said, let's not get ahead of ourselves. Hey, are we still on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was just asking. But, what are you going to work on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. If its cool with you, I want to sort of re-write the Aftermath. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Thanks again. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Plus, he just created his account like a week or so ago, and all of a sudden, he knows how to create a signature, and a few of the Wikipedia policies. Hmm.. iMatthew 2008 20:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
All that proves is I know HTML and I know to read rules. That proves nothing but I've been in school.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 20:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry about that. Um, I think it should be noted in the lead that Cena hit an FU on Edge. IDK, that's just me. What do you think? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, TJ did note that there was a consensus not to add the FU info. in the Results section. So... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
IDK, maybe to summarize what happened. IDK. What do you think? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's fine. If someone objects, I guess we can have a consensus on it. Hey, do you want to start on a new PPV on Friday? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Either, Survivor Series '04 or '06. Do you have any? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright. So on Friday we work on Survivor Series..... '04. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cool. What are you working on right now? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

1947 Sun Bowl

Thank you for the GA pass. If there's anything that comes to mind later on about the article, just drop a note on my talk page, and I'll be happy to address it. Thanks. JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Signpost interview

Hey, you probably know about the WP:PW report thing in the next Wikipedia Signpost. I was thinking: do you you want to answer some of the questions in place of me (the interviewees are me, Nikki, and iMatthew)? I've changed my mind and really don't wanna do it. You can answer the questions at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-03-10/WikiProject report (numbers 2 & 6). The Chronic 03:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I have turned it over to TJ Spyke. Cheers, The Chronic 23:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:Crunchy

Yep, he did. Hornetman broke our deal, so I'm dealing with him on Wikia. Peace, SexySeaBass 03:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

YouTube

What do you mean it's not a reliable source? It holds the actual proof. Much more than some article someone found on the internet which lacks any such proof. If you actually took the time to look at the clip (which you did not as you re-edited this page far too quickly), you'd see that proof. The Dixie Chicks are NOT the ones who performed that night. And if you want this Wikipedia article to be accurate, you'd make the proper changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.141.235 (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Another source

Okay, since YouTube doesn't work for you, I have other sources which say the same thing.

http://tripatlas.com/In_Your_House#In%20Your%20House%2016:%20Canadian%20Stampede http://www.hoffco-inc.com/wwe/ppv/ppv/iyh16.html http://oratory.rajah.com/index.php?archive=3399

And then there's me, who's seen the actual footage and hear Howard Finkle clearly introduce "Universal recording artists, Farmer's Daughter."

The article is not accurate until this is fixed. And since you won't let me do the edit, I'll leave that up to you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.141.235 (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:

In this case, I did notice you were finished with Backlash. Right now, I am currently adding sources to the statements. Zenlax T C S 19:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Its no problem at all. I was, however, going to add them, but you caught me with your message. Now, before I remove the template, is there anything else to add to the article? Zenlax T C S 19:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations, we are finally done with our project. Cheers, my friend. :) Zenlax T C S 19:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I seem to be troubled with the message iMatthew left me on my talk page; can you explain what he means? Zenlax T C S 19:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Can I ask what the message means? Zenlax T C S 19:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm very sorry to hear that. Was the vote unanimous? Zenlax T C S 20:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its alright. If the decision was for a reason, then I respect that reason. Quite honestly, I wasn't around at the time the decision was made and I would like to apologize for not being part of the discussion. Zenlax T C S 20:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, we do. :) I would like to interest you in joining me and Nici for a collaboration; would you be interested? Zenlax T C S 20:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Great. We will be working on Backlash (2005). Is that alright with you? Zenlax T C S 20:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
All of it? Zenlax T C S 20:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, just assumed. What feud in particular would you like to work on? Zenlax T C S 17:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I did have the Batista and Triple H feud in mind, but I think you can manage. Unless, you want to co-write it. Zenlax T C S 19:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Its alright and no you are not sounding like a dick. I think you can manage. I'll look for something else to work on. Zenlax T C S 19:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If its no bother. Zenlax T C S 19:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is it alright if I remove the under construction template from Backlash? Zenlax T C S 19:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've removed it. Zenlax T C S 19:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, the Jericho and Benjamin was not a main feud. The tag team between Michaels and Hogan versus Hussan and Davairi was one of the feuds on the Backlash card. Zenlax T C S 19:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't know exactly. But remember, that their tag team led to Michaels turning on Hogan. But, it'd still be notable to add. Zenlax T C S 19:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, all I know is that Michaels asked Hogan to be his tag team partner, in which Hogan accepted. Which led to a tag team match at Backlash. Sorry, I was not watching the feuds leading up to Backlash. Zenlax T C S 19:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I guess we were both busy in our time. :) Do inform if you have any more questions. Zenlax T C S 19:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE: Another source

Sorry, I'm new to the whole Wikipedia editing and Talking thing (so I don't know if there's a way to reply, if there is), I just try and make edits to fix errors in articles if I can.

And all three of those articles mention Farmer's Daughter as playing before the main event. Did you really check them? I'll quote them in respective order:

1. "Before the main event, Farmer's Daughter performed "O Canada". " 2. "Notes: Owen pinned Austin. Farmer's Daughter sang "Oh Canada." The Premier of Alberta Ralph Klein was in attendance, along with the entire Hart family. An incredible match. The wrestling was great, but the crowd's reaction was unbelievable, and it added so much to the experience. Austin got into it with the Hart family, and in the confusion, Owen got the rollup pin." 3. "Some band named Farmer's Daughter (I have no idea who they are either) sings the Canadian national anthem."

Also, the reference that's currently in the Wikipedia article has an author who says he never even heard The Fink make the announcement as to who performed O Canada, as "the audio on his tape wasn't great." And that he only "found out" that is was the Dixie Chicks later on (which is wrong). So where did he get HIS source from? If you ask me, that reference is far more unreliable.

I'm just trying to help out here. I'm not trying to screw up the Wikipedia article or anything. 76.169.141.235 (talk) 19:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 21:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

OMG

Are you fucking serious? sorry for the language. Oh, I don't mind if you start working on Survivor Series. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seriously. I give you props for finding the "socks". Alright, what are you going to work on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, that should be fun. ;) I got the Event, same as usual. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Question: I need help on writing a "sentence". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes sir. ;) Um, does that sentence make sense with That same night, Cena went onto unveil a spinner belt version of the WWE title? Oh, do I have to add that JBL was going to destroy it, but he didn't. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
So, its alright? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I guess. How's Raw? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I thought you were. Since its WrestleMania rewind night. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Wow. Um, IDK. Its been a long time since I've written a PPV by myself. But, I want to get the Cena and JBL feud by tonight or this week. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Why is that IP's don't like you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
True, but your "I'm sorry, but I don't really care" was pretty funny. ;) As I saw it on the recent changes thing. Hey, if you have time, can you look over the Cena and JBL feud? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's cool. ;) I know that you want to go back and remove vandalism and stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem, Kliq member. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes sir. I just hope, you know who, doesn't come back and starts another controversy, as it did last time. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Amen to that. Hey, I sent you an e-mail. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Got it and sent you another one. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Got it.... and responded back. Sorry for ruining your vandal-time. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You're not, your an Admin, that's your job. ;) Keep up the good work. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox TNA ppv events

I am wanting to know why you need seperate infoboxes for different promotions pay-per-views? Just use one for all so you don't have to create different ones. Mr. C.C. (talk) 06:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see that the infobox was deleted. I see pay-per-view articles are using the wrestling events infobox. If you want, you can just put the items from the pay-per-view infobox into the wrestling events infobox? Mr. C.C. (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

Your welcome, bro. You deserve it, cause you revert vandalism. SexySeaShark 15:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bad News

My brother was in a car accident and I'm currently at the doctors. To all Kliq members I PROMISE that I will be back right after Wrestlemania (if I go). Sorry for the inconvenience, but life is life, right? Sorry :( be back soon NimiTize 19:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is your reason for revert?

It is easy for any edit to be reverted saying it is "unconstructive." I think your edit to the German people article was very unconstructive. 71.237.70.49 (talk)

Changes to the "Dollar" page.

Why do you have an automatic reversion set up for this page? There is no way you could have read the edits and made an informed reversion to my edits.

I felt the other was perfectly fine, but if you think otherwise, then revert. Be BOLD! --Cheers, LAX 01:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi

I disagree with what you left on my talk page. I was not vandalising, I was merely helping the wiki. I will take you to ArbCom if you continue to harass me. WikiMafia1 (talk) 10:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just please don't talk to me. I don't appreciate being reverted. WikiMafia1 (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You keep beating me to the punch! Keep up the good work protecting the 'pedia from vandals! Tiddly-Tom 19:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Frickin' WTF?

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Stop beating me already! ;) Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 19:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Two mins between barn stars - nice one ;) Tiddly-Tom 19:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

A Question

I am starting a project on the Cleveland Force article, and was wondering the best way to do it. Would I copy the article to a temporary storage area and then unveil it, or work on it "on the fly" as it were? You can post your reply to my talk page THX!Hx823 (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus

I replaced the promotional wallpaper for "Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus" and put it an accurate actual CD cover. What's wrong with that? I really don't get it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calliegal (talkcontribs) 23:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, I thought you were capitalizing the image name for no apparent reason. If you feel I was wrong, be bold and revert. –Cheers, LAX 23:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it's okay. Can you teach me how to revert? calliegal_x (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, you're so nice. :)calliegal_x (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)CalliegalReply
Hi again. I try to edit a semi-protected page, and it says "This page is currently semi-protected, and can be edited only by established registered users" but I am a registered member. How can I edit it? Thanks calliegal_x (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)CalliegalReply
Okay, thank you so much. :) calliegal_x (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)CalliegalReply
Okay. What do I have to do though? calliegal_x (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)CalliegalReply

Akutagawa Ryunosuke

I have in front of me the

  1. Rashomon and Seventeen Other Stories -the Chronology Chapter. Trans. Jay Rubin. Penguin Classics (2004). ISBN 0143039846 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum

What makes you put note on my page claiming un-constructivity???

Again, I'm sorry. When I quickly glanced at it, it appeared to be un-constructive. Be bold, and revert. –Cheers, LAX 23:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

NWO expansion (2003)

Me and Blue are going to do No Way Out (2003), I am working on it in my sandbox. I started some expansion, so far how is it looking?--TrUCo-X 23:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about? You mean like this--->January 23?--TrUCo-X 23:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
But that's not how Im writing it, im using a mm/dd format.--TrUCo-X 23:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Im confused, so how do you want me to write it??--TrUCo-X 00:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh ok, I see, but why did you bring it up?--TrUCo-X 00:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh I see.TrUCo-X 01:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanx man. I appreciate it, I needed that. Do you know any other detailed reports out there for NWO?TrUCo-X 14:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok thanx. Hey can you help me fix some of the problems outlined in NWO's FAC, there a couple, and if you do, you will absolutely be credited if it passes that is. Help?TrUCo-X 21:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure, that's if I haven't fixed it by then.TrUCo-X 21:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:

No, I have not. But, I have now. :) Zenlax T C S 19:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

cross posted to all Kliq members

I have created a new layout for The Kliq's pages. I took the "Projects," "Member Interviews," and "Awards" sections and created their own individual sub-pages. The links are located in the navigation bar. The layout has been added to all of the Kliq's sub-pages, as well as the mainpage. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to bring them up at The Kliq's talk page. iMatthew 2008 01:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's fine. I wanted to inform you that next week I won't be able to work on Backlash, as I am going out of state. I hope you can understand. Zenlax T C S 13:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for understanding. Would that be Backlash or the current nominees on the group page? Zenlax T C S 19:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
When will the expansion begin? Zenlax T C S 19:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Did he? I don't think I was aware of the start date. Zenlax T C S 19:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't want to become a problem; if the other members feel that I haven't contributed much with the group project. Zenlax T C S 19:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry. What I'm trying to say is that I may not be able to contribute my time to the group project. The other part is that I don't want you, Blue, Truco, iMatthew, Nici and bulletproof to think that I just joined the group for the heck of it. Do you understand what I'm saying? Zenlax T C S 20:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, that's only for the collaboration of the project that will be started next week. Any other projects that are brought to mind, I'm sure I can help. Just, not this one. I hope you know what I meant. Zenlax T C S 20:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

SummerSlam

I didn't take too many pictures from the show, but I uploaded the best ones I took from the show. They're a little blurry, but I hope they can help you out with the page anyway.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:E6183A05.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AB5AA1DA.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:9E611413.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:253F4CF5.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2F233FCB.jpg

- RYANonWIKIPEDIA

... I think I just did, but I'm not sure.

- RYANonWIKIPEDIA

Is this one any better? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SummerSlam_2007_Set.png

- RYANonWIKIPEDIA

Give me something

Hey, give me a artical to help improve or something thanks

UberULA (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank You and...

All of you thank you very much for nice responses to my brothers injury, its really serious, but I have returned to Brooklyn, NY my hometown, and I guess I wont see the grand stage of them all (:(((((((((( )' But since I reuturned, I will be making my countinues (?) edits to PPV's and what not, once again thank you for your nice responses ;)

P.S If you want me to work on something just message me. NimiTize 23:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, I need refs to replace the ones I took out.--TrUCo-X 00:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
May you help?--TrUCo-X 00:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
IDK if its needed or not, but adding a second ref to all refs in the BG section (there is only 1 per sentence).--TrUCo-X 00:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you do, I want to help. If thats ok with you.TrUCo-X 02:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Haha, Blue asked me the same thing. I created an account, but that website needs SERIOUS expansion..lol. Why don't they just copy and paste from here...lolz--TrUCo-X 02:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for welcoming me back. NimiTize 13:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not really, just reverting vandal from my watch list. You can give something to work on. NimiTize 14:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cool, if you have anything for me, notify me ;) NimiTize 14:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh yea, and any reason why was I banned from Kliq? NimiTize 14:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Its ok. And alot of people piss me off when they keep warning me for putting tags on new pages. NimiTize 14:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
LOL, you made my day. also I put a new item to my rules list on my talk page, lol. How does this sound?

*Dont come here and complain about me tagging new articles, I will not give a fuck about it, and not respond!

Is it good or just sounds to insulting (Even though Wiki created a article about it? NimiTize 14:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'm not really trying to make a point, but when users come to my talk page, thats the first thing they'll see. But I'll ask Blue or Matt on there option, because I dont like to be very insulting. NimiTize 14:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply