Welcome!

edit

Hello, Lady-Phoenix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Wireless ad hoc network. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ~Kvng (talk) 15:59, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: NetSim (April 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor Talk 20:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lady-Phoenix! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor Talk 20:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: NetSim (May 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Substantial article changes

edit

Hello Lady-Phoenix, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia articles. But please make sure to provide a meaningful edit summary when you delete or change substantial content (especially when the content is sourced). Also, please provide an independent reliable source whenever you add substantial new content to an article. If you have any further questions about Wikipedia editing, please feel free to ask me on my user talkpage or at the general WP:Help desk. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, please do not just remove dead references. Better tag them with {{dead link}} like here, and only if that tag remains there for a while (a year), remove the reference altogether. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 13:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Packerfan386. I noticed that you recently removed content from 5G without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask at the Teahouse. Thanks. Packerfan386beer here 08:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply