Lainestl
Welcome to Wikipedia
editWelcome!
Hello, Lainestl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
tedder (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Great tips! Thanks for stopping by! --Lainestl (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
personal note
editI'm surprised nobody has said hello yet- thanks for handling copyediting and typos. I'm a horrible wordsmith, so I really respect those who dive in. tedder (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Tedder! Hope to see you around :)--Lainestl (talk) 01:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Typos
editHello Lainestl, thanks for your efforts fixing typos. Please be mindful, though, that some of the changes that you have made in a couple of articles are not typos and should not be changed. For instance, in Battle of Chongju (1950) and Battle of Gang Toi, words like "defences", "cancelled", etc. are not typos in Australian or Britsh English. Both of these articles are written using Australian English, so it is not correct to change "defences" to "defenses"; "cancelled" to "canceled" or "criticised" to "criticized". The relevant policy directions are WP:ENGVAR and MOS:RETAIN. I hope this won't discourage you from continuing your work, however, finding and fixing typos is an important contribution. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
AustralianRupert - Thank you for bring those items to my attention. I'm aware of wikipedia's policy about this, but must have slipped up on those articles. My apologies! I think I'll start switching disctionaries when working on a non-American english article. --Lainestl (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Josh Owens
editHi, I'm not sure how well-versed you are with the deletion process, but proposed deletion and Articles for deletion are two entirely separate processes. When nominating an article for proposed deletion (uncontroversial deletion), you only need to tag the article in question, and it is highly recommended that you notify the article creator on his/her talk page as well. You only need to create a separate deletion discussion page and add to the AfD log when nominating an article at AfD.
In the case of Josh Owens, I have converted the prod tag you placed on the article into the AfD tag, which links to the deletion discussion you created. As a rule of thumb, AfD takes precedence over prod. I have also concurrently nominated the article for speedy deletion, as I believe he falls under criterion A7 as an article about a real person that does not credibly indicate how he is notable. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention: If you ever need help with deletion, please leave me a message on my talk page and I'll be glad to help. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
KuyaBriBri, Thanks for the message! That was the first time I've come across an article that appeared as though it should be proposed for deletion, so I was doing my best to follow the AfD process, but clearly had some issues. Thanks for correcting everything. I did notify the author per AfD process, and I'll probably take you up on your offer for help next time I run across an article that looks inappropriate. Thanks again! --Lainestl (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
editHello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Survey
editHi Lainestl!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 02:58, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!
editYou're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:
|
 |
|
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere:
|
 |
Message delivered by Dominic·t 19:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
edit| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Lainestl! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
edit| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Lainestl! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)