Lantios

Welcome! Hello, Lantios, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: User pages The five pillars of Wikipedia Wikipedia in eight words How to edit a page (or, the quick cheatsheet version) Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style Glossary What Wikipedia is not Assume good faith Wikiquette Sandbox (this page is for testing) I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing! If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page! Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages: Wikipedia:Community portal Wikipedia:WikiProjects Best of luck to you, and happy editing! Luna Santin 10:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Reference to Dawkins on relativism page

What was needed was an explanation of how the "natural law" clears up the issue.1Z 02:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Well... If there is some absolute natural law, then relativism is in trouble, right? I am not a native speaker though, having troubles with grammar. Lantios 02:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Occupation of Baltics

You are aware Stalin occupied the Baltics before the "Great Patriotic War?" And when it did come, that in Estonia, for example, the Nazis had already left and the Estonian flag was flying in the capital--which re-invading Soviet troops took down? If all you can do is protest it's POV without citing anything, then your POV tags will be removed. —  Pēters J. Vecrumba 06:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Alas, raising a flag does not create a coutry. "The petitions were granted and the three republics were formally annexed by the Soviet Union." See? There is no such thing as an occupation of your own territory. Lantios 13:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

But there is a Soviet lobby in the world.Xx236 10:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The "petitions" were submitted by fraudulent Soviet-installed "governments" whose "election" was reported, with polling results, released by TASS (and published in London) before the election even finished. (And even in the "elections" prior, any plans to join the Soviet Union were denied by the communist "candidates"). Finally, this petition to join would have required plebiscite and was unconsitutional (as the Soviet Union was still pretending that Latvia and the Baltics were sovereign.) Bogus petition. Bogus joining. All Soviet window-dressing on an occupation. The Baltics never "belonged" to Stalin or the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union is dead. It's time for the facts to kill off its propaganda, too. —  Pēters J. Vecrumba 13:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Sure, there was a great deal of lie, blackmail, ultimatums, USSR broke a lot of rules and so on. Lots of Soviet propaganda. There was also anti-Soviet propaganda. The term "Occupation of Baltic states" is an example of anti-Soviet propaganda. "No more Soviet Union" does not mean that one POV is gone, and the other POV wins. It is time for the facts, yes. And the fact is — Baltic states were annexed by the Soviet Union and controlled by it. Of course, there would be a short occupation before annexation if Baltic states would not submit, but they did. Lantios 13:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Reverts on Khimki War Memorial

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khimki War Memorial. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. DLX 17:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually, you have reverted 4 times already - I didn't have time to give this warning after your 3rd revert. Remove the POV tag yourself within 10 minutes and I will not report you for WP:3RR. DLX 17:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

There was a POV tag. You removed it 3 times, I added it back 3 times. I only tried to repair the damage that was caused by you, nothing more. Lantios 18:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

No, you have reinstated in 4 times - I am at 3 reverts on that, see [1]. And you haven't given any valid reasons for it at all, even by most biased editor will agree with that. Give hard facts with valid sources for POV tag or remove it. DLX 18:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

You have made four reverts then, here you go: [2] [3] [4] [5] Lantios 18:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal

There is a mediation case with you listed as one of the parties. It has been changed to open. Jac _roe 22:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

you're faster than me

how about leaving some vandalism for me to revert? lol. I was reverting the vandalism to Atheism but apparantly you were faster than me. well, thanks for reverting so quickly anyways Connör ^(talk) 22:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Denial of Soviet occupation re-created

You may be interested in this: [6]--Dojarca 22:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

You may be interested...

...to comment here [7] and here [8]--Dojarca 08:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)