Welcome

edit
Hello, Lathaminfo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Gman124 talk 04:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

May 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Latham & Watkins. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Latham & Watkins. Thank you. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LittleOldMe (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for 16 hours.

edit

Your recent edits to Latham & Watkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) were introducing information presented from a non-neutral point of view, and it seems to me that you're using Wikipedia to insert information that adheres to your personal stance on the firm (rather than what the article's reliable sources state). In order to prevent the insertion of similar material, I've placed a 16 hour block on your account; when it expires, please refrain from using Wikipedia to push a bias.

(You can appeal this block by adding {{Unblock|why you should be unblocked}} below.)

AGK 18:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I hope you will now stop your vandalism of the Latham & Watkins webpage and simply allow Layoff information and (very appropriate) criticism to remain in the proper section.EdelJamie (talk) 23:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Indefinitely blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent POV/defamatory edits at Latham & Watkins, and for apparently being a single-purpose account dedicated to said activity.. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Bigtimepeace

--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply