Lathaminfo
Welcome
edit
|
May 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Latham & Watkins. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Latham & Watkins. Thank you. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LittleOldMe (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Blocked for 16 hours.
editYour recent edits to Latham & Watkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) were introducing information presented from a non-neutral point of view, and it seems to me that you're using Wikipedia to insert information that adheres to your personal stance on the firm (rather than what the article's reliable sources state). In order to prevent the insertion of similar material, I've placed a 16 hour block on your account; when it expires, please refrain from using Wikipedia to push a bias.
(You can appeal this block by adding {{Unblock|why you should be unblocked}} below.)
- I hope you will now stop your vandalism of the Latham & Watkins webpage and simply allow Layoff information and (very appropriate) criticism to remain in the proper section.EdelJamie (talk) 23:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Indefinitely blocked
edit{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Bigtimepeace --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)