Hello, Lawrlafo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes ( ~~~~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Thomas Glave

edit

I've removed the coi tag. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 00:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

[1]

edit

{{helpme}} I don't understand the above page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ccchambers/Sandbox and think maybe it should be deleted. It is showing up in categories, which is clearly a mistake. Thanks.--Lawrlafo (talk) 05:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looks like a draft article, or an article that was almost deleted and moved into userspace. The user should remove the categories from the page by putting <nowiki> tags around the category listings. You could drop him/her a note on their talk page suggesting this. //roux   05:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the LGBT WikiProject!

edit
 

Hi, Lawrlafo, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies!

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and intersex people. LGBT Studies covers people, culture, history, and related subjects concerning sexual identity and gender identity - this covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful:

  • Our main aim is to help improve articles, so if someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice or clarification.
  • Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
  • If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics.
  • The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, peer review and a project-wide article collaboration, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, Jumpaclass, so please consider signing up there.
  • If you're going to stay awhile, please create a square in our project quilt! You can put anything you want in it.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome!

-- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 21:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


List of writers of LGBT literature

edit

Yobmod, your change of title of the List of LGBT writers is not accurate. I went to great pains to only include people who are LGBT or same-sex loving in the list and not to include non-LGBT, non-same-sex authors who write on LGBT topics. Your new title does not reflect this at all. I would request that you undo your change. Thanks. --Lawrlafo (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, great work with all that sourcing on the list. I changed the title, because it seemed that some of the sources were about works having LGBT themes, not about the writer being LGBT. Although i agree that a writer of works about Queer identity is likely to be LGBT, it is not certain to be so, yes? We also are not including non-LGBT related works by LGBT writers, so calling it a list of LGBT writers is not really true. Can straight writers not write important LGBT literature?Yobmod (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
As an example, Arthur C Clarke wrote Imperial Earth, a gound-breaking portrayal of a gay character in science fiction, but there are not the reliable sources to say for certain if he was gay. Mercedes Lackey is noted for including a variety of sexualities in the majority of her young adult fantasies,which is pretty unique, but she is straight. A list of LGBT writers title would exlude such works, no matter how important they are to LGBT literature.Yobmod (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Yes, non-LGBT people can write LGBT lit, but that would be a different list (the one you propose). You are correct that the books I consulted include non-LGBT authors. I read every entry and verified that the authors I included were in fact LGBT or same-sex loving (either at a particular moment in their lives or throughout their lives), and that this was discussed in the entries. That is my interest: to create such a list. It is consonant with the list that existed. I can cite by article and author every single external source I read, if this is what is required. I did not include writers if their LGBT or same-sex loving histories are not documented or discussed in scholarly literature. I would prefer to remove authors than to have the name of the list changed.--Lawrlafo (talk) 08:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
But you have TS Eliot on this list, and his article does not say he was LGBT, but does mention his relationships with women, including 2 marriages. If he is not LGBT, then this casts doubt on whether all the other uses of that source identify the writer as LGBT, or as a writer of important LGBT works.Yobmod (talk) 08:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

(copied to article talks page)

WikiProject LGBT studies Newsletter (June 2009)

edit

Boricua Barnstar

edit

Don't think for one moment that all your hard work with the accents has gone unnoticed. In appreciation of your work, I would like to present you with the "Boricua Barnstar".

 
 
This Boricua Tireless Contributor Barnstar is presented to User:Lawrlafo for the continous work with accents on Puerto Rican related articles. Presented by Tony the Marine (talk) 04:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Antonio Lopez (illustrator)

edit

You're welcome. I didn't know a whole lot about him before I started researching. I noticed there wasn't a Wikipedia page on him and I thought he was notable enough to need one. Make sure to check out the Smithsonian site about him; the essays there are also interesting.--Larrybob (talk) 23:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Improper moves

edit

Don't be making improper undiscussed, unreferenced moves to names contrary to the cited sources and contrary to Wikipedia:Naming conventions as you did here at Victor Hernández Cruz. How many others have you done like that? Gene Nygaard (talk) 15:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Death of Rane Arroyo

edit

{{helpme}} I have updated Rane Arroyo's article to indicate his death, what should I do on the discussion page to eliminate the biography of living person category? Do I just eliminate it, or replace with something else? Thanks.--Lawrlafo (talk) 21:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

It should have been removed from the BLP category now. --Mikemoral♪♫ 21:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for creating the Rane Arroyo page. I was very sad to hear of his passing. I was fortunate to know him a little and to be published in one of his New Sins chapbooks. He will be missed. Tvaulto (talk) 06:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Puerto Rico

edit

What matters about an LGBT person is the country in which they were born, not necessarily the country where their ancestors were born — there isn't any other political jurisdiction on earth whose Wikipedia "People from" categories are deemed to include people of that ethnic background who were born and raised in other countries, so I don't really understand why Puerto Rico needs to be some kind of unique exception to the way any other country's categories work. If we really need a category for LGBT people who have Puerto Rican ancestors but were born and raised in the continental United States instead of Puerto Rico — I'm not convinced that we do, since we don't categorize anybody else in the tree by their ethnic background rather than their physical birthplace, but I'm willing to defer to other people's judgment if it's felt to be that important — then why not create Category:LGBT people of Puerto Rican descent, or something like that, instead of using Category:LGBT people from Puerto Rico for something it wasn't meant to be used for? Bearcat (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your reply, I will go ahead and create the category you propose.--Lawrlafo (talk) 19:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:Juano Hernández

edit

Your suggestion has been well received and I have complied to your request. Thank you for all of your contributions. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

!Hola!

edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1928_Okeechobee_hurricane#Requested_move Saludos, Mercy11 (talk) 04:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done!--Lawrlafo (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

!Hola! 2

edit
Hi. The above matter has been re-listed with an amended proposal to a shorter title, and the period for comments is about to expire. You are welcome to comment if you wish:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1928_Okeechobee_hurricane#1928_San_Felipe-Okeechobee_hurricane
Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 00:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Inquiry

edit

I wanted to give you a change to respond away from this discussion, since I'm not sure if you've seen my latest comments there, and the discussion is getting quite cluttered and hard to follow now anyway. So I'll just ask you here and give you a chance to respond—do you have any connection to the account User:Broncocastro? Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I know who Bronco Castro is because he is a published Puerto Rican writer, but have never met him in person. He is not my sockpuppet and I did not ask him personally to discuss the category.--Lawrlafo (talk) 02:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:Question

edit

Mi hermano, you ask: "I have a question for you. Is it acceptable Wikipedia practice to have exactly the same paragraph appear in six different articles?"

To post a whole paragraph in various articles exactly as it appears in one article, shows a lack of creativity, however ...

I would say that it all depends if the person posting the paragraph was the creator and originator of the same, otherwise someone is committing an act of plagiarism. Even if the person was the originator of the paragraph, if he/she wants to use the same words on another article, the correct thing would be for that person to cite the article from where it originated. Example, I contributed a paragraph to Hispanics in the American Civil War which I later posted in the "Military" section of Hispanic and Latino Americans, I cited where my original text came from as

. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speech

edit

This humble servant would like to share this speech made before the Commission of the Latino American Museum, with his friends: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=423585291337 Tony the Marine (talk) 23:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Michigan Wikipedians!

edit
 

Greetings Lawrlafo! I noticed that you made mention of the University of Michigan on your userpage. I would like to welcome you, on behalf of the Wikipedians of the University of Michigan, to a group meeting on Wednesday October 20, 2010. The meeting will be held at 7:00 PM (EST) in the University of Michigan Chemistry Building, room 1201. New and experienced editors alike are most welcome to come and partake in the collaboration and outreach of Wikipedia in a real-life setting. Questions? Leave me a message here or at my talk page on Wikimedia Outreach, and feel free to email the group at wikipedians@umich.edu. The Wikipedians of the University of Michigan are excited to see you there! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Assistance request

edit

At Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#Pauly-Wissowa:_RE.2C_Vol._VII_A_2 there is a request from a German Wikipedian with which you might be able to help. Please consider doing so. LeadSongDog come howl! 22:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Looking for Wikipedia Ambassadors

edit

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian associated with Harvard. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at schools in Boston and Cambridge (including Harvard), which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Boston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.

If you're an experienced and active Wikipedian, you might be interested alternatively in becoming an Online Ambassador. The role of Online Ambassadors is to serve as mentors for students; it doesn't require any in-person outreach. Take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jorge Merced

edit

It doesn't matter what he's best known for; if he writes, then he legitimately belongs in the writers category whether he does other things too or not. Bearcat (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, if he's not enough of a "writer" to warrant being categorized that way, then the word writer should be removed from the introductory paragraph. Bearcat (talk) 05:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
For untagging Sofia Maldonado. Cerejota If you reply, please place a {{talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon. 13:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re:James De La Vega

edit

I looked the article over and saw that you have made all the right corrections to it. The last vandalism to the article was made on Nov. 5th. What I suggest is that you first "warn" the unregistered user and tell them that they will be blocked if they continue to vandalize the article. Place the article in your "watchlist" and if they continue to vandalize the article then request a "protection". That is the reason that I hate the fact that Wikipedia does not require that editors be registered like in most reliable websites. If a person wants to edit Wikipedia they should make themselves known and held accoutable for their edits. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Here is part of an e-mail which I received today and since you have gone some work on the article I think you might be interested.

I just read the James de la Vega article and it is much better now. On November 4 it was truly vandalized. I know James (and his mother) pretty well, since East Harlem (El Barrio) was my Assembly district.

I worked with them when they started a tenant's association on 102nd street in 1994, and I went to James's store a lot until he closed it, on 104th and Lexington. I also visited James in his store, down in the East Village.

James even ran for the State Senate in 2004, and rode on my campaign bus! I have one point of information for you. James returned to East Harlem in 1994 from Cornell, when he graduated at age 22. This is confirmed by a NY Times article on his wiki page:

[2]

I saw him pretty continuously for about 4-5 years after his graduation. He was a school teacher during that time. Also during that time, he and a woman named Yolanda Sanchez organized a yearly Youth Conference. After a few years (in 1999) it became known as the Muevete Youth Conference, and it will soon have its 13th reunion (as Muevete) this November. Around 1999-2000 James opened his first art store in East Harlem, and I visited him a lot.

He stayed there for 5-6 years, then closed the store and opened another one in the East Village in 2005. He stayed there until last year (2010).

The point I'm making is this: James is a smart and resourceful young man. I credit his energy and ability for self-invention. But there is one sentence on his wiki page, that simply can not be true:

De La Vega has lived in France, Brazil, and Greece where he spent years studying under Jacques Derrida before leaving the Roman Catholic priesthood and returning to the United States.

There is no way that James "disappeared for several years" and lived in Europe and Brazil, since he was in East Harlem and the East Village the whole time, in a highly visible and public way. In addition, I don't see how James could leave the Catholic priesthood, since he was never a priest (and has NEVER spoken about it, in my years of knowing him). Conveniently, James places his "priesthood" in Europe, making it harder to question...but as I already showed you (and all the newspaper articles also show) James's life has continuously been in East Harlem and the East Village.

I have not read James's book, which is listed as the source for this, but I know that James continuously re-invents himself. You don't need to do anything, or even edit it out, but I just thought I'd let you know.


No vemos,

Tony the Marine (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Aravind Enrique Adyanthaya

edit

Lawrlafo,

I just read your new page on Aravind Enrique Adyanthaya. It is highy polished, very professional for a newly-created page! I italicized a number of the written works -- I did it all in one edit, so you can undo all of it in one stroke if you wish. Great job, Lawrlafo.

Nelsondenis248 (talk) 04:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Feliz Día del Pavo (Gracias)

edit
 
Feliz Día de QUE? Para mi no lo es!

Feliz Día de Gracias Tony the Marine (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 22:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

WP:CANVASS

edit

Please don't WP:CANVASS, as you did here [3]. It could lead to your being blocked. Thank you. Qworty (talk) 19:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Michigan Wikipedians

edit
 

Greetings Lawrlafo! I noticed that you made mention of the University of Michigan or Ann Arbor on your userpage. If you are a current student, faculty, or other affiliate at the University of Michigan, I would like to welcome you, on behalf of the Michigan Wikipedians, to our next weekly meeting on Monday September 30 (and every Monday thereafter). The meetings are held at 8:00 PM (EDT) in the University of Michigan Shapiro Library, room 4041. New and experienced editors alike are most welcome. Do not hesitate to leave me a message if you have any questions, and feel free to stop by the MWiki talk page. The Michigan Wikipedians are excited to meet you! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Pride 2014

edit

Hi Lawrlafo. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Feliz Navidad

edit


  <font=3> Wishing you a
"Feliz Navidad and a Prospero Año Nuevo"
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year)
Tony the Marine (talk)
External audio
  Jose Feliciano's "Feliz Navidad "
 

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

  • What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
  • When? June 2015
  • How can you help?
    1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
    2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
    3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.


Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

Re: Lourdes Vazquez

edit

Hi, I noticed that the reason the image deletion nominator removed the it was: That he didn't believe that the subject took the picture. You can request for the picture to be undeleted here: [4]. Ask for a discussion on the issue. Now, I also noticed that the "Collaboration" section does not cite a source and that the "Awards" section has some "Citation needed" posted. It would be great if that was taken care of so that the "tag" above the article could be removed. Take care, Tony the Marine (talk) 04:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Pride 2016

edit

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

  1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
  2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
  3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Lawrlafo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Interview invitation from a Wikipedia researcher in the University of Minnesota

edit

I am Weiwen Leung, a student at the University of Minnesota. I am currently conducting a study on how people on the LGBT+ Wikipedians group use and contribute to Wikipedia.

Would you be willing to answer a short 5 minute survey? If so, please email me at leung085@umn.edu. It would be helpful if you could include your Wikipedia username when emailing.

Thank you, Weiwen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talkcontribs) 17:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

We're on Twitter!

edit
WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
Hello Lawrlafo!
Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)

RachelWex 01:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Lawrlafo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Lawrlafo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
 

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Awilda Rodríguez Lora has been accepted

edit
 
Awilda Rodríguez Lora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! I appreciate it! -- Lawrlafo (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply