Welcome

edit

Hello, Lbaloga, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 15:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


Welcome!

edit

Hello, Lbaloga, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Spirit Cave mummy

edit

Hi - I see you used one of our articles as a source. We can't do that as our articles aren't "reliably published". See WP:VERIFY. For this subject we need academic sources. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

Hi! This is Sarah W. with my summary of your peer review. There are more details here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lbaloga/Spirit_Cave_mummy/Tranquillitatis317_Peer_Review

I think overall this article is off to a good start. There are a lot of ways to go here and a lot of information that can be added. I think the sources need revisited, especially the allthingsinteresting.com and the oldest.org ones. The sources they pull from seem viable, but the articles themselves do not. I think there are probably some great sources out there since the article was last updated, I'd consider searching jstor or google scholar to find more. I think that the sections are good, but maybe writing them as more paragraph and explanation than hefty sentence points would make it easier to follow and understand. (like explain a bit the area found, or the tech used in locating, the couple and their history). The image you're adding is awesome, and fits in all the things that wiki requires of them. Tranquillitatis317 (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply