Le Lapin Vert

So you think it's ok to help other idiots to haunt, pursue and track down him just because the word is supposed to be free? Cant you you just be so kind and accept our request to keep his name away from here, please? Thanks a lot, Iggo!!!

Thanks for your edits

Hey, I saw your edit to Porter (beer) in my watchlist, and just wanted to say thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. If you ever need anything, you can ask me or the Help Desk. Cheers, Steven Walling • talk 05:07, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

So you think it's ok to help other idiots to haunt, pursue and track down him just because the word is supposed to be free? Cant you you just be so kind and accept our request to keep his name away from here, please? Thanks a lot, Iggo!!!

Victor Wennerkvist

Please do not put back Iodin Jupiters real name coz he do not want it public, ok!

Tank you very much, Iggo from Kitchen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iggof (talk • contribs) 12:26, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

To quote the great poet, FredrikT: "And i, on he other side, would ask you and your fellow editors to please stop removing information from the articles. It is not Wikipedia's task to help artists trying make themselves enigmatic. We are here to provide facts." Le Lapin Vert (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Devil Doll (rockabilly band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Kitchen and the Plastic Spoons

I undid your edits as both links that you added do not work. Please find a working link before restoring the content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

They work for me, can't you read a PDF file?

Proposed deletion of Devil Doll (rockabilly band)

The article Devil Doll (rockabilly band) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RadioFan (talk) 16:15, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

I see you've objected to the proposed speedy deletion of the article. Yes, there appears to be a good deal more material on the German wiki about this band. So I propose the following:

• The article as created on the en wiki fails to meet WP:BAND - please note that this doesn't mean that the band fails criteria of notability, it means that the article does.
• The article on de (and possibly sv) wiki appears to contain more.
• I've removed the article from mainspace and placed it in your userspace at User:Le Lapin Vert/Devil Doll (rockabilly band)
• You're responsible for creating an article of similar standard to the de (and possibly sv) articles in English. If you need translation facilities there are some very helpful people here who regularly translate from foreign language articles.
• Please do note that rules regarding notability differ across different wikis; for an article to be acceptable on the en wiki it needs to meet the en rules regarding verifiability, reliable sources and so on.

Regards, Tonywalton ^Talk 23:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Why bother... Le Lapin Vert (talk) 00:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Because you tagged asked for the page to be deleted, I've deleted it. Author-requested speedy deletions are always reversible; if you change your mind and want the content back, you may ask for help at my talk page, or you can go to WP:REFUND and ask for it back there. Nyttend (talk) 02:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Famine

Hi, you have no idea about state-sponsored famine. Please--->Talk:Famine...Bye...Vikiçizer (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

you have no right to edit

john of nikiu CHAPTER CXX the oldest documents about Bulgaria and Kubrat are from the chronics of JOhn of Nikiu in early 600 AD:

47. And when the inhabitants of Byzantium heard this news, they said: 'This project is concerned with Kubratos, chief of the Huns, the nephew of Organa, who was baptized in the city of Constantinople, and received into the Christian community in his childhood and had grown up in the imperial palace.'

CHAPTER LXXXIX 74. But immediately on his return to the emperor, the latter removed him from his command, and appointed in his room another general, named Cyril, of the province of Illyria. 75. And he also gave battle to Vitalian, and there was great slaughter on both sides. Cyril the general retired into the city named Odyssus, and stayed there while Vitalian withdrew into the province of Bulgaria.

http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/nikiu2_chronicle.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.33.208.26 (talk) 04:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I do have a right to edit. Le Lapin Vert (talk) 04:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

i'm not spamming

you are refusing to read what i'm providing like information.

i'm a history professor at the university of YALE.

you are not only spamming,you are creating world conflicts

with your ignorance.

respectfully, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.33.208.26 (talk) 02:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Read the file description... Le Lapin Vert (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rome. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Courcelles (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Complaint of edit warring at Prince Bernadotte

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Four (so far) users from Swedish Wikipedia reported by User:SergeWoodzing (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

I see you have reinserted a gross attack against a living person which had been added by an IP on Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden. I've removed it. Please don't put it back or you will be blocked. And please read WP:BLP before you make edits about living people on the English Wikipedia again. Bishonen | talk 22:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC).

So it's okay to reinsert it when he has passed away? Le Lapin Vert (talk) 22:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Le Lapin Vert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Le Lapin Vert. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Le Lapin Vert. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)