Lee.xta

Welcome!

Hello, Lee.xta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Re: Your email

This account was blocked as per Berean Hunter's CU findings in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yobtar1 that it was technically connected to other accounts involved in undisclosed paid editing. In addition, behavioral evidence gave an impression that this account, too, was involved in these advertising efforts. In order to request an unblock, you may follow the guidance at WP:GAB. Regards, GAB^gab 02:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Response

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lee.xta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know how to use this so I'm just giving it a shot. I'd like an unblock so I can continue to edit the pages of my favorite influencers. If not, I get it. I suppose an early retirement will have to suffice. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lee.xta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I looked at the article provided to request an unblock. I can understand why there was a block request on my username. I humbly ask for it to be lifted as I solemnly swear to be more careful with the powers of editing. If you see my contributions page, you will definitely see reputable changes done to a few pages, it was for comedians that I admire. That's what I'm really interested in doing and would like to keep that up.

Decline reason:

The chances that by some random accident another account which is technically indistinguishable from yours happens to edit the same draft as you are negligible. I have to conclude that you're not truthful or at best deliberately evasive: "I only have one with this email address and IP address." And how many with other email addresses and/or other IP addresses do you have? I see no reason to lift this block. Huon (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you planning on addressing your misuse of multiple accounts in any way? SQL^{Query me!} 23:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Is that what I'm being accused of? I'm not using multiple accounts. I only have one account and it's linked to my email. I'm actually not sure how you all came to that conclusion. If that could be explained to me, I'd appreciate it. And also User talk:SQL, I'm not appreciating your condescension. Clearly I'm new to wiki editing and really not interested in getting into it with a troll. Check my contributions page before you say anything. It's all legit.

CheckUsers have special tools that let them analyse accounts for technical connections. Yours was determined to be connected to other accounts that have edited abusively. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:07, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

As above. It's beyond an 'I am accused of this' thing. Checkusers have access to advanced technical information. You have been abusing multiple accounts. Would you like to address this issue? SQL^{Query me!} 02:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

As I stated earlier, I'm not using multiple accounts and I'm not sure how to prove that. Are these tools that you speak of showing you which accounts are with which IP addresses or email addresses? I only have one with this email address and IP address. I guess I won't edit random pages anymore and just stick to a genre. If the block can't be lifted, then it's really not a big deal. I just started doing this wiki editing stuff anyway. When will I know the results? And will it affect any of my edits?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vince Thompson (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jack Frost was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vince Thompson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jack Frost (talk) 23:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Vince Thompson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vince Thompson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)