Levinas 25

Welcome!

Hello, Levinas 25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 15:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Action research, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 07:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Please read Talk:Action_research#Proper_sourcing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 07:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

International Journal for Transformative Research

Hello Levinas 25,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, International Journal for Transformative Research, may be copied from http://www.linkedin.com/company/international-journal-for-transformative-research. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 10:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MER-C 11:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hi! I am the copyright holder. I am trying to figure out how to code so I can grant permission for the text to be used. Have a great day!

Quality

FYI, I think you might have better luck adding the educational quality material to Quality assurance or Quality (business). Quality (philosophy) has an entirely different meaning. Thanks for editing and again, welcome to WP.—Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 14:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Living educational theory

Each page that is created on Wikipedia is required to be reviewed on page curation. I reviewed your article and in good faith I added some tags to that editors will be alerted to a problem and can correct the problem. I did not, could not know that you were still working on the page and it is not relevant in anycase. They are there to help editors. I do not appreciate my work being called vandalism. Op47 (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Edit Warring

Your recent editing history at Quality (philosophy) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. [1]Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 06:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)