Lingveno

Proposed deletion of Anhor

The article Anhor has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of HearMeOut

The article HearMeOut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the WP:GNG, no evidence of significant coverage and article was created by a paid editor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 12:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of HearMeOut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HearMeOut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HearMeOut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ivar the Boneful (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HearMeOut company.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HearMeOut company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spotsetter

The article Spotsetter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This seems like it was never covered by WP:RS before the acquisition, received a few articles that just mention the acquisition without going into detail, and will obviously not ever be covered again. Simply non-notable, as it utterly fails the "significant coverage" criteria for its own article. The article was also created by a user who was blocked for undisclosed paid editing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lingveno (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear community, I am asking to review my block and give me a chance to contribute to English Wikipedia once again. I used to be a very productive editor in 2014-2017, and an admin in some wikis, however, in 2017-2018 I have edited and authored a number of articles for the monetary gain. This all started with proper attributions of the conflict of interest and disclosure of the clients and money received, however, as I saw that not going well...I started avoiding disclosing paid editing. The quality of editing has started to drop, and I ended up doing SEO edits (putting pictures and links into random Wikipedia articles) for a user who turned out to be extorting money through my edits - which I had no idea of before it was already too late. Then, of course, I have been blocked in 2018 in English (after a number of warnings) and German Wikipedia. I must state, that I no longer have access to my Upwork account which I have deleted years ago, hence have no access to the client names and the information on the amount of money paid to me. Afterwards, i have started a clean start account - User:Fordaemdur - and haven't done any edits in the mainspace of any wikis with the former account - only in talk pages when it was absoltely necessary. With the new account, I haven't done any edits in English nor German Wikipedia - except one edit on English Wikipedia in my userspace. With the new account, I have been somewhat active in the Russian Wikipedia (where I have autoreviewed rights) and Wikidata. No paid editing has been done since. Right now I am in the process of improving articles related to the economy of my country on Russian Wikipedia and would like to do so on English Wikipedia as well. On enwiki I am specifically going to concentrate on writing and improving articles about the Uzbek and Central Asian economy, their financial market, and notable public Uzbek companies that are important to the economy. I will not engage in any paid or CoI editing anymore. Best, Lingveno (talk) 02:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've discussed this appeal with Lingveno off-wiki, so I'll leave it for another administrator to review. (pinging @Smartse:, as the blocking admin.) Lingveno has stated that, if unblocked, they would like to edit using their new account (Fordaemdur). — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)