Lisamol

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neha Pednekar (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dreamy Jazz were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neha Pednekar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neha Pednekar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Lisamol! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 09:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, Lisamol. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Csgir (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Neha Pednekar

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your first attempt at article creation, Neha Pednekar was declined due to a lack of reliable sources. I went ahead and added the resources, plus cleaned up the text. We have lots of resources for new creators to learn - feel free to browse around. Have a nice day. Csgir (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabeer Kumar (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabeer Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kabeer Kumar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabeer Kumar (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabeer Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kabeer Kumar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 04:56, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabeer K (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Redalert2fan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabeer K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kabeer K, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Redalert2fan (talk) 16:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabeer Kumar (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kabeer Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kabeer Kumar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Kabeer Kumar's article

I noticed you went ahead and moved Kabeer Kumar's article to mainspace by deleting the content off the draft and adding it to a new article in the mainspace. I am requesting a histmerge WP:HISTMERGE to merge the history of that article. It isn't a regular article merge that comes from merge requests, so do not use that template. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Bhumika Gurung

• I won't make anymore disruptive editing, i had already left a message in one of the editor's talk page yesterday but he did not reply. Today i have sent another message to Velella. But i assure there would not any more disruptive diting from my side on this page.

Lisamol talk() 3 July 2019, 10:18

July 2019

Your recent editing history at Chahat Pandey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 01:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 16:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fanandthelights. Thank you. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 15:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kritika Sharma, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lisamol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Respected administrator Sir/Madam whoever has blocked me, i know that i have been long in the list of sock puppets of Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki).; but i assure i can proofs if you carry out a clear investigation with my edits and creations, iknow that all the pages created by me are based on tv actors or series ; but that is my line of interst, i'have been tv serial addict for the lat ten years from the age of fifteen, so i have always gathered information on the people and the series i have always loved and was inspired by; Fortunately wikipedia gave me that platform where i could express my knowledge and language, but that is being cruelly snatched from me on a doubt basis being a sock puppet, when I'm not!!!!! So Kindly carry out your investigation once more using some data like ip adress, place of edit and cross check it with Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw's edits etc rather than seeing seeing only the area of my interest; which is for sure Indian television industry; you can also verify the content i have added in each of the pages created were thoroughly researched(as i'm a research student of media studies) and taken from reliable sources, So i kindly request you to unblock me --Lisamol (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Lisamol (UTC)

Decline reason:

{I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please address the many issues connected with your acounts on the original account, including edit warring and not providing sufficient coverage from reliable, independent, verifiable sources.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lisamol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir regarding the many issues addressed to my account; as you know the area of my interest, so i did try recreating pages of Bhumika gurung' and Chahat Pandey but after receiving the second warning from the editors i did not indulge in more editions for these pages, infact i had written to the editorsFylindfotberserk regarding the article of bumika gurung and Etzedek24 who had appealed to block due to my edit warrings of Chahat Pandey,,,but in the both the cases my intentions were not to indulge in edit wars but to create new pages of the actresses whom i was inspired by; even recently i have sent a message to Nooobietalks regarding a complete recreation of bhumika gurung page; Secondly on not providing sufficient coverage from reliable, independent, verifiable sources. I got this warning message for three different articles Benazir Shaikh, Diya Makhija, Kritika Sharma and Dwiti gajera. For the first two articles, i did add the reliable information later. For Kritika Sharma, i had got the information about her 1992 births in 2009, when i was inspired by her role of Radharani and Young Mauli, unfortunatley the articles are not present online anymore, but i promise once i get the required sources i would do the needful on her article. On the other hand Dwiti Gajera is a baby actress whose maximum reliable sources were provided in her article created, however i will surely add more information when i get more reliable sources after my research on her,,,which i am still in the process of doing. Hence i guess i have made clear my reasons for unblock and the my own proofs that i'm not a sock puppet of Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI ^confirmed _suspected). I genuinely wish that this is the last appeal for unblock that i'm making and do not make innumerable ones, request you to unblock me. i also request you Liz Ma'am to restore my page created on Kritika Sharma as i have provided you the reasons for not providing reliable sources on her date of birth, i assure you Ma'am i will provide the required sources once i get them, but you can verify that all the other sources which i had provided were carefully researched by me and taken from The Hindu, Times of India, Abplive etc....

Decline reason:

That rambling and incoherent unblock request does not make any attempt to address the reason for the block on this account. However, it is blatantly obvious that this is yet another of your many sockpuppet accounts. I shall also remove talk page access to prevent you from wasting yet more administrator time with more of the same pointless unblock requests which stand no chance whatever of success. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:07, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Lisamol (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Lisamol

Speedy deletion nomination of Ravjeet Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ravjeet Singh, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion

This user engaged in block evasion as Lisa290 in August, 2019. This user went out of their way to lie about the sockpuppetry and block evasion, over on that talk page. --Yamla (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neha Pednekar

Hello, Lisamol,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Neha Pednekar, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Gaurav Sareen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaurav Sareen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Sareen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 01:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)