User talk:Litefantastic/2005

Film stub

Why did you change the {{film-stub}} picture? Did I miss the conversation about this, the old version is far better... ~ RoboAction 07:44, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Two reasons:
  • I think the film reel is kind of cheesy looking, and
  • I favor public domain over copyleft. The public domain belongs, no strings attached, to everyone, and I liked that idea.
• But if you want to go back to the original image, I won't try and stop you. We each do what we think works best. -Litefantastic 12:02, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Discworld Template

• Yeah, I get to be the 100th message! Anyway, I was wondering why you haven't changed the DW template over to your new version. I'd do it myself, but I'm sure you have a reason. -Litefantastic 00:31, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

  A combination of "lack of time" and cowardice :-) If you reckon there's sufficient agreement on my new format, I would have no trouble with you doing the switch yourself. If I remember later in the day (RL allowing) I'll have a go myself. HTH HAND --Phil | Talk 09:42, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

Sandbox Bot (SandBot)

I am responding your request for a Sandbox Bot. As far as you are aware, is there anyone operating one at the moment? -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:44, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• No, no one is currently running the sandBot; the box is being cleaned out manually. -Litefantastic 14:54, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Such a bot I can write, in a few lines of code, using the pywikipediabot framework. How often should this bot run? -- AllyUnion (talk) 22:25, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The sandbot is running. Please keep an eye on it. See: Sandbot (talk · contribs). -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:21, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Tessaiga

Hi. I have posted a request to revisit this topic at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related_articles). Thanks. Your input will be appreciated. LG-犬夜叉 09:37, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

InuYasha on Article improvement drive

I have not had much experience with the article improvement drive, so I don't know how effective it would be. Still, it can't hurt, so why not? I think I posted this somewhere before, but just for reference, here is the discussion from the previous Featured Article nomination. Josh 18:40, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Balkans

You asked if I knew the copyright status of the pic I uploaded. How do I find that out? I just searched in google and found a pic. The address of it is http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Ottoman.jpg. The site is an online encyclopedia of nations, religious groups organizations, etc. I read this at the bottom of their site: Maps are linked with permission of the Perry-Castañeda Map Library, University of Texas at Austin. Bremen 18:15, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Soviet Canuckistan

Okay, fair enough. I didn't stop to see how long ago you did the amerime thing, but I figured that since it was on your user page, it must still be fresh. I guess I snapped because of the tendancy of some American editors to discount things that aren't American as being "non-notable". Canadians got a good laugh out of the Soviet Canuckistan thing -- people were selling t-shirts and bumper stickers, and I think there was a website. regards, Kevintoronto 21:49, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

6deg

it moved to http://kohl.wikimedia.org/~kate/cgi-bin/six_degrees. kate.

Inuyasha timeline

Feel free to use my Inuyasha timeline on your Inuyasha Wiki. Just to be clear, the Creative Commons license with which I licensed the image to Wikipedia does actually allow you to use it without asking me (as long as you give me credit), but thanks for asking anyway. I already uploaded the picture for you to Image:InuyashaTimeline.JoshG.jpg on the Inuyasha Wiki. Be sure to let me know if you want a bigger version or a different format or something. Josh 04:59, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)

Sandbot's HTML warning comment

Stevey7788 has suggested something different for the little warning on the sandboxes. I would like your input on the matter. Please see User talk:AllyUnion#sandbot_messasge for more information. -- AllyUnion (talk) 02:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

COTW Project

You voted for Roaring Twenties, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Falphin 03:29, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Southeasteurope-blank.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Southeasteurope-blank.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 19:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Article Improvement Drive

For your tireless work on rolling over the AID during the past months I award you the Barnstar of Diligence:--Fenice 06:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Update

Hi - I updated the AID-page today, Saturday, because of an ongoing edit-war at abortion - the page is locked. We should find some mode of avoiding controversial subjects like that article becoming Improvement Drive projects, because articles like abortion have no chance whatsoever to become featured.--Fenice 19:41, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Actually, no, as I said on the talk-page of the AID, I cannot promise to take on the responsibility completely and by myself (which has nothing to do with the AID but with my real life). I will however try to do much, which can be all of it at times - except for the archiving, which you mentioned above. (I have no idea how to do this archiving and have never done it. Maybe I will change the system so I can handle it.) I have figured out the template thing though, I think, and I created one (IDRIVEtopic) so that the portal page is updated automatically. As you say - if it dies, it dies. I want to give it a chance though, because it is so young. Much of it is a matter of advertising - the AID was not on the main maintenance-templates. I would appreciate it if you stay, but I understand if you don't.--Fenice 05:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have had a look at /history - I can handle that and /removed is not really necessary.--Fenice 06:31, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You asked why I changed the name: I thought 'article' is superfluous because everybody knows we're not improving tomatoes (even though they'd need it). Also, I was trying to find out why it attracts less voters and contributors, and I thought there is no hint in the name that this is on only a limited period of time. Article Improvement Drive sounds like a workshop where continual work is done. I tried to make the signature color more activating to make it look more dynamic. The change in voting system and curbing to one article was proposed and agreed to by others on the talk page. Concerning the mnemonic: I think these articles don't need mercy, they need drive. --Fenice 12:11, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

IDRIVE

There is vote going on Wikipedia:Template locations on whether the nomination template for this and the the COTW should be put on the talk page or on the article page.

Also, you voted for refugee, so you routinely get this template:

You helped choose {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} as this week's WP:ACID winner

--Fenice 18:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

changing nomination procedure at wp:cotw

I respect that you dislike the current nomination procedure, but I would be grateful if you discussed it rather than implementing your preferred version at the current time. Cheers, Talrias (t | e | c) 01:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Vinyl record/Gramophone record merge

But "disc record" is a neologism that more people will be unfamiliar with. Not only that but the term on its own merits would also apply to a CD. Better to use "gramophone record" as the main title. And don't forget to put in the redirect from "phonograph record". The first is British and the second is American. Or use "phonograph record" as the main article simply because the US population is 5X the British population so phonograph would theoretically reduce the server redirect activity. --Blainster 06:07, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

See Talk:Gramophone record for the long discussion and vote that resulted in the main article being at that title. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 13:00, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Come help!

Gaming Collaboration of the week

You showed support for Gaming Collaboration of the week. This week Wikipedia:Gaming Collaboration of the week/current was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

Jacoplane 08:59, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Combubble_oldstyle.PNG

Image deletion warning

Image:Combubble_oldstyle.PNG has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Obsoleted by Image:Fukidashi.png which you found at jp. — Jeandré, 2005-07-24t10:34z

RFA

Hi, I'm sorry about your RFA, and I'm sorry I didn't see it earlier. I would have voted for you. Maurreen (talk) 16:34, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive

Hi! Did you mean to vote on the nomination of Spyware for the improvement drive? You placed your name in the Comments section rather than Support -- I wasn't sure if you meant to make a comment, or to vote in support. --FOo 01:35, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

• Drat. Yes, that was a motion of support. I'll correct it if you haven't. -Litefantastic 16:09, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you pruned 2 of the nominations in the list. It was my understanding of the page that the dates were inclusive, so as to ensure a full week at least for people to vote on a given nomination, but if you are sure this isn't the case I will defer to your experience :) Mallocks 16:02, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Joe Bob Briggs

It seems to me like the actual entry should be for John Bloom, with Joe Bob Briggs a redirect to it. Thoughts? Matt 11:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

   Ok, cool. Thanks for the response. --Matt 13:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

self destruct button

Do you know of any specific examples of this? Particular "mad scientist" stories or somesuch? Anetode 04:52, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

• Kaolla Su (Love Hina)has at least one, in her ot air baloon. I also remember Plankton (SpongeBob SquarePants) having a coin operated one built into one of his robots. -Litefantastic 23:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

WP:AID

Why did you change the color on the AID template. I'd like to change it back (for template uniformity) but I think it's only fair to hear your side of the argument first. -Litefantastic 00:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Well, both the AID banner and Wikipedia:Community Portal now use Template:IDRIVE-current. This is so that when the title of the current collaboration is changed in one place, it changes everywhere else it is used. We recently changed all the other collaborations on the Community Portal to use this technique so that the Portal could be locked to protect it from vandalism, while still allowing collaborations to be updated by non-admins. It also makes it impossible to forget to update the Portal when updating the banner. Unfortunately, I had some trouble getting the color of the link to be different on different pages using the same template, so I thought it was easier just to change the color of the AID banner so that text of the same color could be readable on both pages. I think if you moved the [[ ]]'sout of the template and into the two pages that use the template, you could probably use similar markup to what you were using before in the AID banner to make the link text white. Personally, I really don't care what color the banner is, as long as the text is readable and the collaboration title is synced. -- Beland 00:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Article improvement drive

I posted this on the Article improvement drive talk page without response: "I'm a little confused by what winning entails. Articles that need the most improvement (i.e., they are "winners" because they are actually quite weak)? Conversely, articles that are very close to FA (winners because they are, in fact, fine articles)? Or is it simply, "I find this topic interesting" and thus I vote? Whichever, it should be made clear at the top of the page." Any comments? A page I work on has been "nominated" but I have no clue what a vote means. That it's totally underweight and needs help? That it's a step away from FA? What? Marskell 22:55, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: Test card

The best I can offer you is this circumstantial evidence. Scroll down to the message timestamped 23 Mar 2004 20:23:21. As of now, I cannot find any evidence that this image is in the public domain, nor can I find any evidence that its copyright is still in effect. Its original copyright date is 1939, AFAIK.  Denelson83  02:40, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Emergency department

I wonder if you would consider supporting Emergency department atWikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. This department is where we all go if we are very ill, and I feel it needs a boost if it is ever to get featured article status. I would greatly appreciate if you were able to offer support on this.--File Éireann 16:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Many thanks for your support. We'll try to make it an article to be proud of. --File Éireann 10:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Greetings

I am curious about how 20 of your articles went to vfd.

Your iglet article is the most fascinating trivial article I have ever read! It is cool that people like you are on wikipedia. You are funny guy! Rintrah 16:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Possible sock puppetry at AID

Please check what I wrote at Wikipedia_talk:Article_Improvement_Drive. Since you are the maintainer, your opinion counts a lot. --Laisak 14:30, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Emergency department

Many thanks for your support!--File Éireann 18:42, 21 November 2005 (UTC) Would you mind changing from Van Gough to Emergency department at Community Portal as I don't know how to. Many thanks.--File Éireann 23:49, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Community Portal

Have a look at Community Portal, I've made Article Improvement Drive as prominent as Collaboration of the Week, and introduced a new template:SAID. I'm willing to keep an eye on it each week to make sure its updated, although I'm not always a tremendous timekeeper! Best wishes--File Éireann 00:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

AID changes

Hey,

I'm curious, why arn't the changes posted in the AID drive history table anymore? --ZeWrestler ^Talk 15:55, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Gramaphone record - "Making your own records"

Hey,

I was wondering if you added the section about "Making your own records" in the Gramaphone record entry. When I look at the history, that section doesn't appear before your change at 21:45 on 2 November 2005.

If you did, I'm curious if you have any more information related to the "Personal recording devices" section. Such as what those machines are called, what their components are, etc.

If it wasn't you, do you know how to see who made which contributions? I'm brand new to the underbelly of wikipedia and I'm having some trouble understanding how to do different things (the interface isn't very intuitive for me).

Thanks, hope you can help!