Little tinyfish
Welcome to Wikipedia, Little tinyfish! If you haven't seen these essential pages already, take a look:
For more help, our help desk is open 24 hours a day. If you're ready to get going, check out the Community Portal for something new to work on! Good luck!
Ashibaka tock 08:10, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
ASoB
editHowdy and thanks for your work on the The Arrogant Sons of Bitches article. I wanted to let you know about two features of Wikipedia which may come in handy: move a page (click the "move" tab at the top of the article, right next to "history") which allows you to retitle an article without the hassle of copy and pasting (and is generally prefered, since it keeps the history and comments and a couple of other technical reasons), and Wikipedia:Redirect, which automatically sends one page to the other. I think perhaps setting up a redirect from Arrogant Sons of Bitches to The Arrogant Sons of Bitches is best in this case, and will go ahead and take care of it here. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if I can help with anything. Again, thanks for the work on making a great article. --Hansnesse 08:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Disambiguous links
editI noticed that you recently added a link to Portland here. Portland is a disambiguation page as the phrase has many uses including Portland, Oregon and Portland, Maine. In the future, could you link the term to one of the articles listed on the disambiguation page, that would be great. As an example, if you're linking to something related to Portland, Oregon, you would input [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]]. Thanks! --Bobblehead 17:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Revert
editI noticed when you edited the Cursive article you were wondering how to revert to an earlier version. At the top of the browser window there is a tab named "history". Clicking on this gives you a list of all the versions of an article. You can click on the date/time of a particualr version to view it. If you edit an old version of an article and amke no changes you will essentially revert the current version of the page back to this old version. This is a quick way to undo inappropriate edits. For more info check out WP:Revert. Hope this is of some use to you.--Opark 77 19:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
This was a non-notable band according to the criteria set out in WP:Music. Perhaps Myspace would be a better location for this information rather than an encylopedia, until the criteria are satisfied. (aeropagitica) 01:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't suppose there is a way to get the original coding. They're going to be in a couple of more notable sources by the end of the year, and I don't want to have to re-type everything. ---little tinyfish
Cleaning Up Citations
editMuch thanks for cleaning up the citations on the Cursive article! They look much better now.
AfD nomination of The Arrogant Sons of Bitches
edit
I have nominated The Arrogant Sons of Bitches, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Arrogant Sons of Bitches. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? // Chris (complaints)•(contribs) 22:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Black Ox Orkestar
editThe text you added to the Black Ox Orkestar article appears to be a copy from http://www.last.fm/music/Black+Ox+Orkestar, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While contributions are the lifeblood of a free encyclopedia, Wikipedia has to require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. They take copyright violations really seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Black Ox Orkestar and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Black Ox Orkestar, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Black Ox Orkestar with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Black Ox Orkestar. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It might also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you want to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Black Ox Orkestar saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thanks for contributing to the project, sorry if there's any mix-up, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. —Wiki Wikardo 20:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Little tinyfish. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Little tinyfish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Little tinyfish. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Mash Down Babylon Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:NCORP
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)