User talk:Lobed Homunculus

Welcome!

Hi LobedHomunculus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Augmented Seventh (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello! LobedHomunculus (talk) 21:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LL Orionis (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Notability (astronomical objects)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LL Orionis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, LobedHomunculus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

ok LobedHomunculus (talk) 14:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Still not autoconfirmed

My account is still not autoconfirmed even though I've already made ten edits and my account is four days old. LobedHomunculus (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

You will be autoconfirmed at 18:27 UTC. It is now 16:43 UTC, so you have to wait another c. 1:45h. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

alright LobedHomunculus (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of CM Velorum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CM Velorum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CM Velorum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

21 Andromedae (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

ok LobedHomunculus (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Also, if you want to write about an astronomical object, consider seeing if it meets any criterion of WP:Notability (astronomical objects). If you want to see sources that mention it, the SIMBAD database is your friend. 21 Andromedae (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

I use SIMBAD a lot. It's pretty good. LobedHomunculus (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:LL Orionis

Hello, LobedHomunculus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LL Orionis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:V582 Cassiopeiae

Hello, LobedHomunculus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:V582 Cassiopeiae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:10, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:ESO 248-6

Hello, LobedHomunculus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ESO 248-6, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:10, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Talk

Hey @LobedHomunculus, Can i also help in your astronomy articles if you like Abdullah1099 (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes LobedHomunculus (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok, Good Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:39, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Added some more information to Draft:Stephenson 2 DFK 52. Abdullah1099 (talk) 06:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

thanks LobedHomunculus (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephenson 2 DFK 52 has been accepted

Stephenson 2 DFK 52, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey @LobedHomunculus, Even though i accepted the article but it still needs work to be done Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

I'll improve it later LobedHomunculus (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry

Im sorry for making you uncomfortable because there was a misunderstanding, I thought Homophobic was a neutral word, and it's actually not, and I'm not homophobic, I'm sorry for all of this and I don't have any bad intentions to anybody, I also removed the names other editors on my userpage in the "some remarkable things that happened to me" section, I hope our relations can improve Homlos (Message me bro) 01:41, 18 June 2026 (UTC)