LoganRich, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi LoganRich! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Mary the Virgin, Chiddingstone

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St. Mary the Virgin, Chiddingstone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.streatfield.info/ui38.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Route nationale 158 moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Route nationale 158, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A84 autoroute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N12 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 16:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to London Southend Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please do not remove source content without giving a valid reason. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Boeing 777 and Boeing 787 Dreamliner‎, without citing reliable source(s). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thanks, -Fnlayson (talk) 19:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anton du Beke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page This Morning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Incredible New Year’s Eve Parade (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Redalert2fan were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Redalert2fan (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Incredible New Year’s Eve Parade (December 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Whispering were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering(t) 18:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Route nationale 158 concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Route nationale 158, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of BBC newsreaders and reporters, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of BBC newsreaders and reporters, you may be blocked from editing. This is the second message on the same subject. Please abide by Wikipedia conventions. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at BBC News at One, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop these uncited changes now. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 17:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Persistent unsourced changes

edit

Please ensure you that include reliable sources when adding or changing information in articles. If the material is already sourced within the article, you should be leaving an edit summary explaining so. On a related note, you should be providing an edit summary for all of your edits. I see that concerns have been raised regarding your use (or non use in this case) of sources in the past, yet you continue regardless. In fact, despite making nearly 300 edits in a year of editing, you have not communicated with any editor on this project. Please note that adherence to our policies regarding reliable sourcing is required, and leaving edit summaries and responding to concerns raised by others is expected. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:The Incredible New Year’s Eve Parade concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Incredible New Year’s Eve Parade, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Incredible New Year’s Eve Parade

edit
 

Hello, LoganRich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Incredible New Year’s Eve Parade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Route nationale 158 concern

edit

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Route nationale 158, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Route nationale 158

edit
 

Hello, LoganRich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Route nationale 158".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply