User talk:LordVoldemort728/Archive 28

Archive 25

Archive 26

Archive 27

Archive 28

Archive 29

Archive 30

→

Archive 35

New page reviewer

Hi LordVoldemort72. I'm sorry to tell you that I have revoked your new page reviewer right early (courtesy ping @HJ Mitchell: who originally assigned it for a month). I've reviewed your recent curation log and draftify log and found an unacceptably high error rate. For example:

1. Amanda Moll – moved to draftspace three minutes after creation
2. Toyotomi Tsuramatsu – moved to draftspace two minutes after creation
3. Mein Heimatvolk, mein Heimatland – moved to draftspace because (according to your message to the creator) it had "no sources", but there are three sources listed in the article, which is a translation of de:Mein Heimatvolk, mein Heimatland
4. Lake Tuz Facilities – moved to draftspace because (according to your message to the creator) "it needs more sources to establish notability" but it is a one line stub with five sources that plausibly meets WP:NPLACE
5. Cheran, Nalanda – as above
6. G10 nomination of a draft that is patently not an attack page, minutes after you A7'd a mainspace article with the same title

Taken together with the thread you started on NPP/R, I'm not convinced you have even made an attempt to read the NPP guidelines and related policies, despite Rosguill already having advised you that NPP is not something that should be rushed into.

You can re-apply for the right at WP:PERM/NPP, but I strongly encourage you not to do so until you have properly familiarised yourself with the relevant policies and guidelines, especially Wikipedia:New pages patrol#Care and WP:DRAFTIFY. – Joe (talk) 15:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Further to what Joe says, it looks like you really need to slow down. Focus on doing one thing well rather than the scattergun approach of trying to do lots of things without fully understanding any of them and making a mess. You applied for just about every permission going, were granted one for a trial, and now it's been revoked. This causes me great concern and is something you need to address, not just before applying for any other permissions, but before anyone starts to question whether you should be editing here in the first place. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

I took a look at your AfC reviewing. While most are fine, there were some recent mistakes:

• Draft:Pathali Pahar was declined as like an essay, but it was not essay-like
• Draft:Abhay Firodia was declined for notability and because one phrase "India's largest van maker" sounded like an advertisement.
• Draft:Dreri Kali Pora Shopian was declined for not meeting the minimum standard for inline citations but is a draft about a village, not a BLP.

I echo the comments above. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

About Your comment on AFD on Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta

Hi, as you have voted for deletion of the article Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta as you have mentioned that being candidate of any election doesn't passes notability but can you please check people can still be notable if if they meet the general notability guideline as stated in WP:NPOLITICIAN section. So I request you to please check the subject on this parameter WP:GNG as the subject have a significant media coverage from different reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Thanks and regards. Info.apsharma (talk) 06:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Shah Jahan Begum (First Lady)

Hello, LordVoldemort728. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shah Jahan Begum (First Lady), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinod Kumar Sharma (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinod Kumar Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, LordVoldemort728! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Vinod Kumar Sharma has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vinod Kumar Sharma. Thanks! Akevsharma (talk) 14:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanuj Solanki has been accepted

Tanuj Solanki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gazal world (talk) 07:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babu Lal Tiwari has been accepted

Babu Lal Tiwari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 17:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malina Debnath has been accepted

Malina Debnath, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gamini Singla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamini Singla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamini Singla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 13:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Denzil J. Godin has been accepted

Denzil J. Godin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Akevsharma (talk) 17:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. Lalrinliana has been accepted

K. Lalrinliana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HouseBlaster^talk 05:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: All the Lives We Never Lived (Novel) has been accepted

All the Lives We Never Lived (Novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)