LukGasz
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
edit
|
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
I requested that the page be "properly" moved. It might take a day or two (likely less). In the future, please use the "move" function which is to the right of the "View history" tab. This works only if you are an autoconfirmed user with a number of edits btw. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. I do that a few times a day. Thanks for your contributions! Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 31
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish Armed Forces rank insignia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Australian Meritorious Service Medal 1902-85
editThe AWM site shows the central stripes as black. So does museumvictoria.com.au and heritagemedals.com.au
Yet, heritagemedals.com.au says:
- The Australian issues from 1903 to 1975 (note: not 1985) (when they ceased to be awarded to Australians with the introduction of the Australian Honours and Awards system) has a crimson riband with two central green stripes.
I'm confused. And I haven't found an "official" definitive document yet.
On what did you base your colour choice? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/REL36101/?image=1#display-image
- http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/REL36101/?image=2#display-image
- http://museumvictoria.com.au/collections/items/1206233/medal-commonwealth-of-australia-meritorious-service-medal-king-edward-vii-australia-1903-1910
- http://www.heritagemedals.com.au/medals-1/service-long-service/meritorious-service-medal.html
