LuvaJotvingis

August 2024

Your recent editing history at Ponary massacre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mellk (talk) 14:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

LuvaJotvingis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a multi-account or anything like that, I only have one Wikipedia account. I am not a distributor of Polonophobia, but I do not agree with this article, source of Joanna Janusiak is newer and therefore a more reliable, it was published in a studio in which the co-editor is the University of Szczecin...

Sincerely LuvaJotvingis

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a multi-account or anything like that, I only have one Wikipedia account. I am not a distributor of Polonophobia, but I do not agree with this article, source of Joanna Janusiak is newer and therefore a more reliable, it was published in a studio in which the co-editor is the University of Szczecin... :Sincerely LuvaJotvingis |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a multi-account or anything like that, I only have one Wikipedia account. I am not a distributor of Polonophobia, but I do not agree with this article, source of Joanna Janusiak is newer and therefore a more reliable, it was published in a studio in which the co-editor is the University of Szczecin... :Sincerely LuvaJotvingis |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a multi-account or anything like that, I only have one Wikipedia account. I am not a distributor of Polonophobia, but I do not agree with this article, source of Joanna Janusiak is newer and therefore a more reliable, it was published in a studio in which the co-editor is the University of Szczecin... :Sincerely LuvaJotvingis |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

LuvaJotvingis (talk) 15:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

intriguing page history. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

I will warn user about edit warning. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.

Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.

Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what it all means. Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

CU technical data shows this account is at least  Possible to Panzeras invančukovich. It is, unfortunately, a noisy range. --Yamla (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)