Turán–Kubilius inequality

edit

Thanks for your note on Turán–Kubilius inequality. This is not a new article (it was created on April 15), so to qualify for WP:DYK it would have to be expanded 5x, to at least 5250 bytes. Expanding it that much is beyond my ability. --Uncia (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lithuanian Special Operations Force

edit
  On April 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lithuanian Special Operations Force, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Victuallers (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jonas Kubilius

edit
  On 29 April, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jonas Kubilius, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 00:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

PD tag

edit

Quick answer: {{PD-USGov-DOS}}. Renata (talk) 05:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welles article

edit

Nice job, as usual. Will poke around a little more. Best, Novickas (talk) 14:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not bad at all. A few minor grammatical problems, but like I said they are minor. It might help to identify "Lauterpacht" a bit more. John Carter (talk) 17:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sorry I didnt finish...I'd like to rewrite the background section a little, if it's OK with you. Something along the lines of "While they share some prehistoric commonalities, the countries developed along differing cultural and linguistic lines...all were incorporated into the Russian Empire during the late 18th century, and developed national identities (Lithuanian National Revival, etc) during the 19th century..." Will probably have some time this weekend. So glad to see all your new work :) John, it's always nice to have outside input and help, but it's especially welcome from someone with your reputation. Best, Novickas (talk) 04:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm a little bit at a loss as how to best order it...Maybe we could ask Renata, or sleep on it. But signing off for today. Later - Novickas (talk) 20:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC) P.S. Whatever you want to do is OK with me. Novickas (talk) 00:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Just an update, interlibrary loan estimates the Routledge book will be available within a week. It looks like a great resource. Regards, Novickas (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC) This one: [1] Novickas (talk) 21:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Digestion, you know - I want and need to read and digest the whole thing. Novickas (talk) 21:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey, you're back, wonderful. Am about to do this to the article: add a section called Secondary sources, put the books ref'd more than once in there, and for inline cites to them use the format 'Ickes et al. p. 41' (Gbook url where possible.) Hope you don't mind. Best, Novickas (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Soviet ultimatum

edit

I actually have the article written off-line (about 70% done), just need another half day to finish up and insert references... which I don't see happening until the end of the month :(

BTW, I think the dab page you created is missing Soviet ultimatums to Latvia & Estonia in 1939 (to sign the mutual assistance treaties). I am not sure if those were actual ultimatums or just sternly worded "demands". Renata (talk) 19:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The 70% that I have so far in case you are interested. Renata (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
As the invasion was predicated on the ultimatums not being met, they were more than "demands." I think that's well supported. PetersV       TALK 20:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well disamb page always can be expanded to include remaining ones. M.K. (talk) 09:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

edit

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Žirmūnai

edit

The pronunciation was allegedly in the IPA, but it wasn't. It turned out that it was in an ad hoc transliteration also used at Vepriai and maybe for some other Lithuanian cities. I hope I've converted these properly, but I don't know Lithuanian. If you can help out, here or at Lithuanian language, that would be appreciated. kwami (talk) 00:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image requests

edit

Unfortunately couldn't find them, but time was limited...Viso gero, Novickas (talk) 13:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

AN/I thread

edit

Thank you for pointing out the respective Digwuren ruling, however, now that I started the thread at AN/I, I suppose I can't take it to AE anymore. Would probably have been the better choice though - the lack of responses of uninvolved admins at AN/I make me feel that accusing "that German" of "whitewashing Nazi crimes" and stating "I do react when hearing German language on the street" is considered legitimate background noise a contributor is expected to endure and not the actionable offense I regard it. I'll just wait and see what happens. Skäpperöd (talk) 15:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

FYI I had mentioned that when I went to Poland in 1970 I was warned by Poles never to speak German only English, memories of the war were fresh in the minds of many people. Germans were not allowed to travel there. I also remarked that in 2002 while in Gdansk in 2002 I heard German spoken by persons in the street. The younger generation is lucky, they have no memories of the German occupation. I wanted to clarify Skäpperöd's remarks.--Woogie10w (talk) 22:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Grybauskaitė

edit

I tend to just focus on the boxes. I don't really like to edit the prose because I'm by no means an expert. Thank you, though. Therequiembellishere (talk)

Hi - I'm done for now. One question, should I use the EN version of her candidacy speech from her Facebook page [2]? ("I decided to return to...") Novickas (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oy. Well, then, I'll tweak the translation..yikes. Novickas (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Could we re-word the DKY hook: ...that Lithuania's President elect, Dalia Grybauskaitė (pictured), dubbed the "Lithuanian Iron Lady", holds a black belt in karate? Novickas (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

My Reply

edit

I hear you. By the way today User:Skäpperöd put a Communist Hammer & Sickel over documented material on Nazi war crimes in the article Polish areas annexed by Nazi Germany. Other editors have spent the day debating what do do. Wkipedia is surreal--Woogie10w (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I ask you to read the following Wikipedia:Gaming the system, I believe this guideline is relevant right here and now seeWikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 May 17#Template:Communist era sources. Nazi Crimes in Poland were not communist propaganda.--Woogie10w (talk) 21:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok, will do later today or tomorrow. Hope it is ok, M.K. (talk) 22:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Executive Order 8389

edit
  On May 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Executive Order 8389, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Welles declaration

edit
  On May 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Welles declaration, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

edit

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Southern Poverty Law Center a reliable organization?

edit

For clarificaiton, this is what Martintg was inquiring about at the WP:RS noticeboard. I'd say it's a specialist organization that can be relied on in making the calls as to the reporting of particular facts which are cite-worthy for Wikipedia – you can see the context for it at my last edit for Neo-Nazism#Estonia. I added this to WP:RS – would be great to have your opinion on this specific case. Thanks a bunch, PasswordUsername (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Fluxus 1

edit
  On June 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fluxus 1, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 08:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I've nominated an image you uploaded for delisting because of copyright concerns. Hopefully, the issue is a minor one and can be quickly resolved. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. J Milburn (talk) 16:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Will answer on that page. M.K. (talk) 08:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

edit

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Signature of Valdas Adamkus.png)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Signature of Valdas Adamkus.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Any progress on finding the permission for this picture? I don't mean to rush you, but this nom has been open for quite a while. Thanks. Makeemlighter (talk) 08:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

edit

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

edit

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

edit

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

edit

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

regarding 3RR

edit
Wow, is this Jacurek??? Thats hate speech and definitely a WP:PA, not to mention illegal in many countries WookMuff (talk) 00:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't think it is J. It just a routine rant, because of my strict application of 3RR rule across Wikipedia. M.K. (talk) 09:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well... thats sad. Lithuanian hate is just so... surprising to me. I didnt realise lithuanians were reviled. I thought they were just... from Lithuania and ummm thats all I know :) WookMuff (talk) 10:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations you won! Answer is correct - Lithuanians are indeed from Lithuania! Now, lets move to the final question of today's show! Be aware, that it is the most difficult question up to date! Are you ready!? Are you prepared!?...[awkward pause]...This is it the final question: what is worse - to be a member of the Eastern European mailing list or engage in the edit war? The clock is ticking! M.K. (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well I am polish by heritage so... Edit war? WookMuff (talk) 19:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Errr, answer is wrong! Both are evil :P You lost all your points! Jokes apart, from which part of Poland you originated? M.K. (talk) 07:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

M.K.

edit

When I saw that you had complained about User:Jacurek's edit warring, I got very confused. I had been watching this user, trying not to bait him but seeing if he would overstep 3RR and so then I saw your complaint was wondered if maybe you were me and I had been editing Wikipedia in my sleep... My Initials are M.K. you see :) WookMuff (talk) 00:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

LOL, lunowikiholic? , M.K. (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Is this my Id? Cmon... back in the pit! WookMuff (talk) 10:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I deny everything! M.K. (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I see you guys have a lot of fun :) Mission accomplished yet? :)--Jacurek (talk) 13:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I suggest you too to have fun instead of silly revert wars, which you waging across Wikipedia. M.K. (talk) 16:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I will have a lot of fun if you stay away from me, o.k.:)?--Jacurek (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Calm down, ya doof. I am opposed to you because you are letting nationalistic pride invade an article that has little to do with your anti-soviet rhetoric. Nobody is denying that the soviet union sucked, or that poland has had a hard time the last umm lets say 200 years, but you can't let it get you down. WookMuff (talk) 19:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lithuanian General dude!

edit

So far, I have come across a few small points I can't exactly smooth out. I will post them here once I finish. Other than that, going well and he seems like an interesting man. WookMuff (talk) 11:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK! M.K. (talk) 11:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

"reserve lieutenant in the Soviet Army, becoming SA motorized infantry platoon leader" Military ranks of the Soviet Union Junior Lieutenant, maybe? Also, I don't understand SA. Sub-Altern?

this source says "Rank of reserve lieutenant.". "SA" stands for Soviet Army.M.K. (talk) 11:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ah, probably a lieutenant in a soviet Military reserve force.

"Lithuanian National Defence Volunteer Forces|Voluntary Service of National Defence" Was there a name change? Did the "Voluntary Service of National Defence" become the "Lithuanian National Defence Volunteer Forces"?

Yes there was a name change, however "Lithuanian" is added in order to separate from similar articles.M.K. (talk) 11:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

"course of strategic studies." He was taking courses in strategy?

I think so. M.K. (talk) 11:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Cool, will go fix that up now

WookMuff (talk) 11:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Arvydas Pocius

edit
  On October 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Arvydas Pocius, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 21:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Petri and Martintg: them Poles are not to be blamed for nothing!

edit

[3]

Thanks for indicating the first stadium in that funny bit of Wikipedia history. Martintg has answered it. I took the liberty of answering back.

Oh, before you answer yourself, you may consider the fact that Petri Krohn is on record as asking everybody who is standing up for him to reveal their real name, e-mail, personal history (resistance to nazism or communism in particular) and any ties to the Russian or Soviet government (I suppose in your case that may include ties to the Lithuanian or, God forbid, German government) to arbcom. ;>)

I suppose you will get by that "problem" if you do not mention him (no idea why Martintg mentioned him, anyway). :>)) --Paul Pieniezny (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

EEML

edit

If you want to tell ArbCom something directly, I suggest you email them instead of posting on the talk page. On the talk page members of the web brigade will try to drown your message into walls of text, and the arbs will not read it. Offliner (talk) 12:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Arbcom permission for EEML evidence

edit

Arbcom clerk comment: MK - in this post you claim that you were given permission to quote emails from the archive in your evidence. As this directly contradicts an Arbcom directive, I will need proof of this permission. Otherwise I will be obliged to remove your evidence. Manning (talk) 14:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

In the absence of specific Arbcom permission to do otherwise, you will need to refactor your evidence to abide by the Arbcom directive (see here). Otherwise I will be required to remove your evidence and apply a block. Manning (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

EEML- spelling

edit

Hi. I hope you do not object to me trying to help you there - but you should have a good look at the spelling in your table. You have a number of times misspelled meat puppetry and sock puppetry. "administrators function abuse" is also a problem. It needs to be a genitive singular (since your evidence is against ONE admin). "Administrator's function abuse" would both be correct and clearer. Only wanting to help, and feel free to delete this comment after sorting it out. Take good care. --Paul Pieniezny (talk) 00:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the tip! M.K. (talk) 08:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Relocation of EEML evidence

edit

Just a notice: For a few users I have relocated your EEML evidence to a sub-page.

The reasons for this are because your sections are now so long it was becoming impossible to navigate and decipher who wrote what, particularly towards the end of sections. This effectively rendered your evidence as unusable, which was not a good thing.

Rather than reduce the size of your evidence (which I deemed as unfair) I have removed them to private subpages. These are yours and yours alone to edit. They certain make interpreting your evidence MUCH easier.

The downside is that when you update your evidence it does not go into the history log of the principal evidence page. Hence I suggest you add a brief "Updated evidence on ..." note beneath your evidence heading on the main evidence page. This will alert people to changes on your subpage. An extra bit of hassle I know, but it a small price for having evidence which can be understood.

Also feel free to create a single sentence description of your main headings and insert it on the main page below the link I have added. See this for an example from a previous case.

I hope none of you are upset by this - I assure you my only objective was to increase the usability of your evidence.

Sincerely, Manning (talk) 22:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re Welles Declaration

edit

Just to make sure it was OK, I asked here about doing the GA review and the suggestion was that it would be better for someone else to review it - my guess is that it will pass without much problem. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think it should be a pretty smooth process for GA. Hope it is not too long a wait, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I can see it becoming a FA evetually - you might want to ask the GA reviewer about that. One concern might be the length as comprehensiveness is an FAC criterion - trying to predict what will or will not be an issue at FAC is pretty tricky. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 11:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

edit
 

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

edit

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Move

edit

I have been considering what do with it since it was posted. I have been waiting to see how it evolves. If things get heated or it becomes unwieldy it is going somewhere else. KnightLago (talk) 16:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA reassessment of Vilnius Castle Complex

edit

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Vilnius Castle Complex/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nice work

edit

Thanks for translating File:Swedish Empire in Early Modern Europe (1560-1815).png! Skäpperöd (talk) 13:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

It was my pleasure. You welcome. M.K. (talk) 15:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Revert

edit

I reverted your recent edit to the proposed decision talk page of the EEML case. The talk page is for discussion of the proposed decision only. The arbitrators monitor AE so they are aware of what is happening there. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss further. KnightLago (talk) 14:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I understand your point. I suggest you send the committee an email with the link and an explanation of the connection with the discussion restriction. That way all of the arbitrators will be sure to see it. The talk page, besides not being a noticeboard, by my estimation is not reviewed daily by the committee. The committee's email address is <arbcom-l lists.wikimedia.org>. KnightLago (talk) 15:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request

edit

I'll try to help with the Marcinkus article over the next few days. Dr. Dan (talk) 12:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

edit

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays

edit
 
Happy Holidays!

Linksmų Kalėdų ir laimingų Naujųjų Metų! Novickas (talk) 23:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

...And congratulations on Welles Declaration. Novickas (talk) 14:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

edit

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Regarding articles Danielewicz and Bohdanow

edit

Greetings,

I made some changes (cleaning up) in the Danielewicz article and I would be gratefull if You can look at it and leave some comments to improve the article.

Furtheremore, as Im quite new on Wiki, I had some troubles to add tag regarding copyright information on my pictures. I reloaded and renamed those pictures, added tags with copyright information and in the articles I change ref. to those new pictures in the articles of Danielewicz and Bohdanow.

Could You please check if i did something wrong again or if it went om this time!?

I've just spend 8 hours on improving and changing...i have to get my life back! ;)

Best regards, Camdan (talk) 07:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

edit

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Sorry...

edit

I did not know that the version is not ready yet. I've checked out the page a few times over the past few weeks, and seeing that you have yet updated the actual article, I thought you simply forgot about it, so I took the liberty to update it myself. I hope you finish and update it soon. PIL1987 (talk) 13:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

edit

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Romualdas Marcinkus

edit
  On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Romualdas Marcinkus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, thanks for the credit, looking forward to GA :) Novickas (talk) 00:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, M.K. You have new messages at Skäpperöd's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Coordinator elections have opened!

edit

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:04, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

LT article

edit

Thanks for the invite. I have WP burnout, but since you ask...and since it's the first Ghit...OK. My thought would be to follow the general structure and content of Canada, an FA. Later, Novickas (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Forgot to mention this week will be kind of busy, what with Velykos & taxes (isn't that a much nicer combination than the usual). Any particular wishes wrt to the article? Novickas (talk) 12:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

edit

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Black day for Poland

edit

Thank you for expressing your views. 12 hours after I heard the news, I still can’t process it. Your support is however appreciated. Jniech (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Second Northern War

edit

The article Second Northern War you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Second Northern War for eventual comments about the article. Well done! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, M.K. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 January 18#Richard Tylman, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kingdom of Lithuania (1918)

edit

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

edit

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)

edit

This is a heads up as all the other involved editors have commented on Talk:Polish–Teutonic War (1431–1435)#Move request -- PBS (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I suggest strongly that next time you comment on a move that you stick to the merits of the move based on sources. Comment like this one is not the way to build a consensus for a move (see WP:PERSONAL). -- PBS (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

edit

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Czeczot

edit
Greetings! I see many changes in the question of the nationality, I do not question his roots of being from Belarus origin but there are certainly those that want to change it, when they do the change, maybe You could write short comment so they don't change it back. i will of course support Your point of view. Im myslelf of the Ostoja Clan and we perfectly know every family origin from before (about 240 families) and also today. If You need support and references, I can be of help if You wish to use them. I do the historical research of the Ostoja's since 1986, My references is Adam Heymowski (10 years of guiding from his side) and I do not think that anyone would question his publications.
To the question of writing the name, well...in the Commonwealth we had ONE administration and it was actually polish, it was totally dominating in the nobility of both Belarus and in Lithuania. Therefore, I thing that it is correct to write Czeczot as it was the historical spelling of the name in all of the Commonwealh. However, that itselft does not change the facts of the Belarus origin of the Czeczot family.
Thank You for watching the side and correcting errors!

Best regards, Camdan (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are now a Reviewer

edit
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

edit
 

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members

Editorial

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

edit
 

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

edit
 

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Milhist election has started!

edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 19:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

edit
 

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:50, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Alma Adamkiene with Kateryna Yushchenko.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

edit
 




To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notice: Your name is mentioned, and your editing is being discussed, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement

edit

See [4]. Novickas (talk) 03:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Arbitration enforcement warning: Eastern Europe

edit

  The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision.

This warning occurs in consequence of this AE request, and you are particularly warned not to edit-war to change names in articles related to Eastern Europe.  Sandstein  07:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Warning: Please do not continue edit wars at Władysław Syrokomla

edit

Hello, this is to notify you that you have recently made a revert at Władysław Syrokomla that continues a very old edit-war about how to describe this person's nationality. This is to notify you that you may be blocked for participating in an edit war if you make even one more revert related to this topic. See User talk:Sandstein#So... for the discussion that made me aware of this issue, and for a recommendation how to resolve it without further reverting. Thanks,  Sandstein  22:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

edit
 

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

edit
 

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

edit
 

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for keeping an eye on LT BLPs

edit
  The BLP Barnstar
Thanks for your work in maintaining Lithuanian BLP articles


Viso gero, Novickas (talk) 01:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

No problem ! M.K. (talk) 18:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

edit
 

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Alma Adamkiene with Kateryna Yushchenko.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alma Adamkiene with Kateryna Yushchenko.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

edit
 

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Olbracht Gasztołd

edit

I have opened a new move request to see if the name that was proposed and had consensus or if the other name discussed had consensus. When editors are endorsing either of two names, consensus is murky. So a new nomination should clarify this. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit

What did I do wrong? 108.82.99.158 (talk) 18:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

edit
 

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

edit
 

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Military Historian of the Year

edit

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Adam Mickiewicz

edit

Please don't revert into this article false information about Adam Mickiewicz, who was only a polish poet. In 19th century both: Poland and Lithuania were not literally on european map, but he was writing only in polish and had contribution only to polish culture. To avoid misleading facts I've given reference from Britannica where facts are clear. Please stop contributing false information. There is a harm for knowledge if only english Wikipedia is given false information when Pl.wikipedia and others are following the truth. I'm able to understand than lithuanian language and national consciousness awake in late XIX c. but there is not a reason to claim that Mickiewicz was a lithuanian poet. Andrzej19 (talk) 10:39, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Restoring edits by a banned user while simultanously asking for page protection due to banned user activity

edit

Hi. Recently you reverted my reversions of a banned user here here and here. At the same time it seems you asked for a page to be protected [5] because it was being edited by a banned user. I have no problem with the the request for protection, but it just seems weird that on the one hand you are trying to protect articles from edits by some banned users, while at the same time you are busy restoring edits by another banned user. I'm sorry to say but this smacks of gaming and bad faith. If your concern is that banned users disrupt some articles you can't turn around and try to enable other banned users (putting the question of sock puppetry aside) from disrupting other articles.

Also, your edit summary was completely non-constructive.

While this isn't edit warring per se, it is very much battleground behavior and possibly meat puppeting. If you would like to self-revert your edits and start a discussion on one of the three articles talk pages that would be a start.VolunteerMarek 23:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Vilniaus diena.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vilniaus diena.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

References needed (Vilnius Castle Complex)

edit

This article needs some refs added for it to maintain its GA status. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Adoption of Jogaila by Elizabeth of Bosnia

edit

Hi! Could you please take a look at Talk:Jogaila#Adoption by Elizabeth of Bosnia? I saw your explanation of the adoption so I thought you could help me find out more about it and/or help me find exactly where the source mentions it. I am wondering because I am trying to improve the article about Elizabeth of Bosnia. Thank you! Surtsicna (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

You've been mentioned

edit

Hello M.K. Your editing has been mentioned at WT:AN3#How to deal with disruptive reverts which don't actually break 3RR. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Refactor request

edit

Please refactor your comment about me at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Volunteer_Marek_and_MyMoloboaccount. I consider it highly offensive. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since you have ignored my request, and given a problematic pattern I see with your edits, I have asked the community to look into your edits. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#M.K. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have decided to withdraw my request as a gesture of good will. I would appreciate it if we both could move on from our past and rather unfortunate history. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good article review

edit

Vilnius Castle Complex, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Military history coordinator election

edit

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the projectwhat coordinators do) 09:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply