MOI~enwiki
Your edits to this page were copied directly from another website, which is not permitted without explicit permission. —Centrx→talk • 17:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am new here. Can you explain to me how to use Wikipedia? I just felt that the ISA page was very biased. I thought that maybe if instead of having a page of controversy against the school, we could add info about the school instead.MOI 18:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
That is perfectly acceptable. The issue is with copying the text from the other website and also completing over-writing what is already there. Add to the page, don't remove information that is there. —Centrx→talk • 18:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
EFG is the account of a person banned for disruption, trying to circumvent his ban. It would be safe to ignore anything he says and remove it from your talk page if it is a problem. —Centrx→talk • 20:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia!
edit
|
hi there!
editI'm fairly new here myself ... Anyway, you can find out about adding descriptive boxes to your userpage here: WP:Userboxes
Have fun! - Valarauka 12:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
You're welcome! I just fixed up the Islamic Saudi Academy article some, go take a look. And I removed EFG's jabber from your talk page. Valarauka 03:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
How's that? ;) - Valarauka(T/C)
22:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
btw - check out Web colors#Web-safe colors to see how the color codes work. - Valarauka(T/C)
22:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- ) sure, just check out Wikipedia:Barnstars, it's all explained there. Basically: {{subst|barnstar_type|message ~~~~}} -
Valarauka(T/C)
02:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup tag
editI understand that you dislike the tenor of the debate on the Muhammad page, but please note that the CleanupConfusing tag is for articles only; it puts non-talk page articles into a category that they don't belong into, and can create problems with the associated bot. If you're confused by the content of the talk page, you may want to consider asking people to clarify in the appropriate sections, or asking the individual contributors whose words you don't understand (if it's important that you do so). Captainktainer * Talk 23:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Muhammad article
editSalaaam, Thanks for the offer, but I am very busy these days, and I can't give time to Muhammad article, as the opponent party is really persistent. And you need some commitment to tackle them. Sorry for that! TruthSpreaderTalk 02:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Rules
editYou are obviously new to wikipedia. Please read WP:V, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS before you make any changes. We're all working hard on the Islam related articles(Muslim and non-Muslim), and we're all following the rules. Arrow740 02:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
You can add stuff, but it has to be something a reputable scholar has written, or something that has been published by a reputable source. And it has to be attributed to that person, and it has to be verifable, i.e. we all have to be able to confirm that the person you say said something actually said it. It is pretty strict around here. There are some people who ignore the rules and screw stuff up, so when a new person comes along I get worried that this will happen again. Arrow740 17:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I don't think anyone erased your stuff on the Quran and science talk page. Your user contribution page says you only edited the semen vs. sperm section once. Arrow740 06:11, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Question from my talk page
editRegarding this; naw, I just got fed up with the American education system and read some books on the subject. The public has been fed misconceptions about so many things, it's astounding. I like to say these kinds of things around my friends, and seem smart for knowing the actual meaning of a word :\. Cheers! --Hojimachongtalk 18:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Murree
editIt's also my hometown...I just hope you pre-read it before you save the page. Raabbasi 20:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
editHello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called MOI. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name MOI~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
01:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
editThis account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
15:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)