User talk:Mabuska/Archive 42017/May
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Mabuska in topic Dispute, your help would be greatly appreciated
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mabuska. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ATL
This discussion may be of interest. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 08:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I had already noticed it but was yet to comment. Mabuska (talk) 13:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Dispute, your help would be greatly appreciated
Greetings, Mabuska. Apologies to bother you but there is currently a situation on the page Plaid Cymru. I was wondering if you please help as you did on the talk page of the Conservative Party (UK)? There has been discussions on the talk page but, well I'll let you see from the edit history and talk page what's gone on and let you come to your own conclusions. Any help you could please provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Helper201 (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- yes, he will see you are edit warring. Why are you running to him attempting to "rat me out"? he is not an adminstrator. If you think I am edit warring then report me.Apollo The Logician (talk) 11:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- One editor makes a request for external input from a vastly experienced editor not involved in the dispute and without mentioning anyone and the other makes dubious accusations. Says a lot. I will take a look and give my honest viewpoint based on Wikipedia protocols as I always do. Whether I am an admin or not means nothing. All admins are are editors with special privileges, it does not mean that any specific admin is better than a standard editor and all are subject to the same restrictions and sanctions as ordinary editors. Mabuska (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- He said this "well I'll let you see from the edit history and talk page what's gone on". He ironically accused me of edit warring in an edit summary so I thought that was what he was doing. I see I was now wrong in that. My apologies to Helper.Apollo The Logician (talk) 08:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- That's better, though "ironically"? Did you mean indirectly or something? Mabuska (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)