MalachiPro

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia due to false sockpuppet accusations, even made by administrators.

This account is not a sockpuppet of RichardHornsby and should be unblocked.

Welcome

Here are some lamingtons to welcome you to WikiProject Australia!

G'day MalachiPro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Article titles

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 03:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:RichardHornsby per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RichardHornsby. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 20:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@The Wordsmith I am not abusing multiple accounts. All the unblock requests get declined even though I am not a sockpuppet. MalachiPro (talk) 01:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalachiPro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of RichardHornsby. I did not edit the sandbox which other RichardHornsby socks do. MalachiPro (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the evidence discussed in the SPI. 331dot (talk) 08:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalachiPro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not do anything wrong. There is no technical match and I am only a SUSPECTED sockpuppet which I am not. MalachiPro (talk) 23:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not sufficient. You will need meaningfully address the reasons for your block. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalachiPro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Behaviour is not enough to justify a block. Public transport can be anyones interest. MalachiPro (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Behavior is sufficient reason to block. PhilKnight (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalachiPro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I edited Wikiversity which is different than any other socks. Also I did not do any disruptive editing. MalachiPro (talk) 01:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Disagree, I find Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RichardHornsby/Archive persuasive. Daniel (talk) 10:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2024 second unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MalachiPro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You just banned me forever falsely. I went to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/RichardHornsby and commented that I am not a sockpuppet which I really am. I even told CFA which reverted my constructive edits that I am not block evading. MalachiPro (talk) 01:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No attempt to address the arguments and evidence presented at SPI. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.