Mam KP
Mam KP, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Mam KP! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mallika Singh (April 5)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mallika Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mallika Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Welcome
edit
|
April 2021
editHello Mam KP! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't upload images that you find online. Generally, those images are copyrighted by someone else. This includes Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Pintrest, news websites, and just about every other website out there. In addition, calling them "on work" means you're taking credit for someone else's work which isn't right. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Resubmitting drafts
editPlease don't resubmit a draft that's been rejected without making changes that try to address the comments from the prior decline. There's a large backlog of drafts, and resubmitting without changes just takes up time that's better spent reviewing new drafts or that have had changes. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Lingireddy Muralikrishna Reddy, Ph.D for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingireddy Muralikrishna Reddy, Ph.D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)